"How I grew up atheist and ended up Catholic" -Jennifer Fulwiler, THIRST 2013
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Bismarck Diocese
Views: 257,013
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Catholic, Church, Bismarck, Diocese, Diocese of Bismarck, Bishop Kagan, Kagan, Roman Catholic Church (Religious Organization), Atheism (Religion), convert, Jennifer Fulwiler, Fulwiler, THIRST, THIRST 2013, conversion
Id: Z_Ab6l0q784
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 48min 59sec (2939 seconds)
Published: Tue Dec 17 2013
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Previous discussions;
I wonder if any one else thought that Jennifer Fulwiler was a atheist? There is a talking head on CNN, S.E. Culp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._E._Cupp#Personal_life
who claims to be a atheist except that I've never heard anyone else call her a atheist.
Atheism isn't dogmatic so claiming you once were one and now not means nothing. You could have simply been raised in an environment devoid of any religious teaching or discussion... while you are technically an atheist you're an ignorant one. If you are atheist but haven't had the chance to think critically about religion you're as big a target as an infant.
I agree with the folks here that say this is aimed at the faithful to enforce their beliefs.
She says that she follows her father advice of seeking the truth even if it's not pleasant, then rejects atheism because it's not pleasant...Which btw, her reasoning [the pig being more important than her baby] is flawed because atheists argue about that the same way Christian argue about what is moral. Atheism doesn't make that assertion.
I'd like to see a good argument against her because her story is pretty legitimate and I can see how someone like her can think that way.
What I wrote about a year ago;
Yep. It's silly. The 'I used to be an atheist' angle is aimed at the faithful, not atheists.
If the person was really an atheist before, they could use their understanding of what an atheist is to talk with atheists. Yet, that's not what happens.
The only credible 'ex-atheist' stories I hear are from people who had some 'experience of god' and admit they can't explain it to someone else. The more common and less credible examples are the people who focus on abstract points of religious dogma while ignoring any talk about why they are personally convinced that any gods exist. This is basically what the blogger is promoting, but the target audience can't be atheists because there is no indication that they know what would be credible or compelling to an atheist.
If an actual former atheist wants to convince atheists that gods exist or that gods are credible, there are better ways to approach us. They would be better served by remembering what they know about being an atheist and simply talking. Attempting to get credit up front for being an atheist in the past is just ham fisted. Can they mention it later? Yes, but not till they show they know what the hell they are talking about and who they are talking with. Even then, though, it's not a very good idea.
"I used to be an Atheist like you but then I found God" is typical bullshit from someone like this. I don't believe her for one second. I've heard that story so many times from people who just feel like talking down to me because I don't believe in God.
How could she surrender her human rights to Catholic dogma?
She mentions Ancient Greek philosophers and how she can't believe they got away with saying that people made up god and religion to try and explain things before science, etc... Can someone expand on this? Specifically about ancient greek philosophers. She made no attempt to expand on it herself.