Asking how big the universe is seems like
a silly question. I mean- like- it’s big. Really big. How big, you might ask? Oh, I dunno, there’s probably a 'your momma'
joke in there somewhere, but suffice it to say that it’s ginormous. But ginormous isn’t really a scientific
term- although it should be. So, seriously now, how big is the universe? Well the first thing you need realize is that
many people misunderstand exactly what that question is asking. We first need to distinguish between the entire
universe and the universe visible from Earth. Those are different things. So how much of the universe can we see from
our vantage point here on Earth? Well light has a finite speed, specifically
about 300,000 kilometers per second, or about 186,000 miles per second, which means that
when you see an astronomical object, you’re seeing it like it was in the past. For instance, it takes light from the Sun
eight minutes to get to the Earth. You probably knew that. But that has bigger implications. For instance, that means that there is a sphere
around the Earth with the radius of the Earth/Sun distance where light takes eight minutes to
travel to us. And that sphere idea is true in general. There is a sphere around the Earth with a
radius of a light year. If we could somehow send lots of super bright
lights a light year away to surround the Earth and briefly blinked them, what would happen
is that the light pulse would take a year to get to Earth and they’d arrive at the
same time. When we saw them, we’d be seeing a blink
that was a year old from objects located a lightyear away. We can take this idea to the extreme and ask
what is the oldest thing in the universe, and that is, by definition, the moment the
universe began. That happened 13.8 billion years ago. If the universe wasn’t expanding, the farthest
thing we could see would be a sphere, centered on the Earth, with a radius of 13.8 billion
light years. This is what we call the visible universe. Inside that sphere, light has had time to
get to us. Outside that sphere, it hasn’t. We can’t see anything outside that sphere. Now I should caution you and point out that
the numbers I quoted for the visible universe are true only if the universe isn’t expanding. Of course, it is expanding, so the situation
is a little more complicated. I made a video about how that changes things
and you might even want to take a look at it. But the bottom line is that there is a sphere
centered on the Earth that is the extent of the visible universe. Is that how big the entire universe is? The answer to that is almost certainly no. The universe is bigger than we can currently
see right now. And you already kind of knew that. For instance, as we look out and see the light
from the beginning of the universe today, we can see out to some distance. If we look again tomorrow, we will be able
to see out to that distance, plus an additional light day. That’s because light traveling over the
course of those 24 hours will just be getting to us tomorrow. And, inexorably, day after day, we will be
able to see a larger and larger sphere of the universe. There are locations that we cannot see today
because the light simply hasn’t had time to get to us, that we will be able to see
tomorrow. Again, this ignores the complications due
to the expansion of the universe. We’ll get to that in a minute. So if the entire universe is larger than the
portion we can see, how big is it? Well, to answer that question, we need to
back up and be a bit more careful. Let’s start with talking about the oldest
and most distant thing we can see. As it happens, we can’t see the moment the
universe began. That’s because the early universe was so
hot that light couldn’t pass through it. You can sort of think of it like a fog. However, there was a moment about 380,000
years after the Big Bang when the universe cooled enough to become clear. The temperature at which that happened is
about 3,000 degrees centigrade or about 5,400 degrees Fahrenheit. Everywhere in the universe the temperature
was identical. And, at 3,000 degrees, it was glowing hot. So you’d think that when we looked out with
our telescopes, we’d see a glow about like what you’d see in a steel mill. But this is where the expansion of space comes
in. Since that moment, the universe has been expanding
and cooling and even stretching space. The upshot of that is that what once would
have been viewed by the human eye as white, is now no longer visible and can only be seen
by radio antennas capable of detecting microwaves. For that reason, this oldest thing that we
can actually see is called the cosmic microwave background, or CMB, and the temperature of
the universe in the current day is now 2.7 kelvin, or -270 degrees centigrade, or -455
degrees Fahrenheit. Pick your favorite units. So that’s the first big thing. This microwave radiation that measures that
the current temperature universe as 2.7 kelvin is a fossil remnant of light emitted when
the universe was about 3,000 degrees. This temperature is almost the same everywhere,
but we’ve learned that there are very small variations in the universe’s temperature. These variations really are incredibly tiny. The hottest and coldest spots are only a hundredth
of a percent different from the average. Our current best measurement of these variations
comes from a telescope in space called Planck. Astronomers using the Planck observatory have
measured the entire sky and their map of these temperature variations is what we see here. The blue spots are colder than average and
the red ones are hotter. So those temperature differences are pretty
and all, but what do they have to do with the size of the universe? It turns out that these variations were caused
by sound waves in the hot universe just before it became transparent. And because we know the temperature the universe
was at the time, and we have measured the total amount of matter we can see in the universe,
we can calculate the wavelength of those sound waves. It’s a complicated calculation, but a straightforward
one. And I want to emphasize that there is no guesswork
on this. We have heated matter to these temperatures
and we’ve measured the matter we see in the visible universe. We know a great deal about the wavelengths
of sound that were present. Sound in the early universe is pretty much
the same as the sound you use to hear me. Sound is transmitted through variations in
the density of air and you can hear a variety of frequencies. In the early universe, the regions of higher
and lower density due to the sound waves result in hotter and colder spots in the cosmic microwave
background. And, given that we know the wavelength of
the loudest sound in the universe before it became transparent, we can calculate the angular
size of the most common sizes of hot and cold spots in the microwave background. Further, we can calculate what size is the
most likely and it should be one degree as viewed from Earth. Okay- so now we’re getting somewhere. We have a firm prediction of the size of the
hot and cold spots. This brings us closer to our question, which
I remind you is the size of the universe. Now that prediction of one degree depends
on the shape of the universe. Remember that Einstein’s theory of relativity
says that space and time can bend and morph. Space could be one of a variety of different
shapes. It’s hard to imagine this in the three dimensions
that we know space really is, so we have to substitute a two dimensional analogy. Bear with me. A flat two-dimensional space is like the surface
of a table. Flat means flat. But a two-dimensional space could be like
the surface of a globe, where, if you kept on walking you could, in principle, end up
back where you started. This is called a closed space. Another possibility is space could be shaped
like a saddle. This is an example of what is called an open
space. So those are the three basic possibilities
of the shape of space. How does that fit into our question? It comes down to the fact that light travels
in a straight line in space. But, if space is curved, then we can get fooled. Let’s use the hot and cold spots in the
microwave background to see what I mean. If space is flat and a distant spot in the
microwave background is one degree wide, then we will measure its size as one degree. This is the simple mathematics of triangles
that you learned in geometry class, where straight lines travel in – well straight
lines. But that behavior doesn’t have to apply. Let’s see why. For instance, if two ants were in flat space
and they were separated by a certain distance and started walking parallel to one another
in a straight line in that flat space, they will always stay the same distance apart. If you do the same thing on a closed or spherical
space, the two ants will eventually run into one another because straight lines in curved
space are curved. This is like lines of longitude on a globe,
where they are parallel at the equator, but intersect at the pole. And the opposite is true in an open space
like the saddle space. There, the two ants, initially a fixed distance
apart from one another and walking in straight lines, will eventually diverge and get farther
apart. That’s just curved space for you. So this has consequences when measuring the
apparent size of these distant spots of the microwave background. If space is flat, the line that crosses the
spot you’re looking at and the two lines that go from the edges of the spot to your
telescope form a common triangle. But in an open or closed curved space, the
triangles are distorted. Let me be more specific, because this is super
important. In a closed, or spherical, space, what one
would expect to be a straight line is curved in a specific way. The crucial effect is that the angle of the
triangle near your eye is >>bigger<< than if space wasn’t curved. The opposite is true for a closed, or hyperbolic,
space. Here, the curvature is in the opposite direction. We see that the angle of the triangle near
your eye is smaller than if space isn’t curved. Now the telescope can’t see the whole path
travelled by the light. All it sees is the angle of the light coming
into your eye or the telescope. All you see is the angle of light coming into
your eye, with the closed, or spherical, space angle being bigger than expected and the angle
seen in the open, or saddle-shaped, space being smaller. And if we apply this to the spots in the microwave
background, this means that a spot that is one degree wide in flat space will be different
in a curved space. So this is a perfect way to test whether space
is flat or curved. In a flat space, the dominant size of the
spots should be one degree. If space is curved and closed, the spots should
look bigger. If space is curved and open, the spots should
look smaller. So what did Planck and other experiments find? A drum roll please, maestro? The measurements found that the size of the
spots is one degree. From that, we conclude that space is flat. Or can we? Well, yes, sort of. But that is an incautious statement. Physics is an experimental science. When we say that the Earth is flat, what we
mean is that the measurement is consistent with being flat. But that also means that the measurement is
consistent with a tiny bit of curvature. For example, if we’re at the beach on the
ocean and look at the horizon, it surely looks flat. But, in spite of the claims of some people,
the Earth most certainly isn’t flat. It’s a sphere. So, you have to keep this in mind. What appears to be flat can, indeed, be curved. And when we measure space, we can only say
that it appears to be flat. And that is true of space as well. Space appears to be flat. If, and I repeat if, space is flat, then the
universe is infinite in extent. Our visible universe just a small bubble in
an infinite sea. Similarly, if space is shaped like a saddle…what
scientists call a hyperbolic or open space…space is also infinite. But what if space is closed and shaped like
a sphere, but so big that it looks flat, like the Earth can look flat? Well, in that case, space is not infinite. It has a finite size. So now we’re getting somewhere. If the universe is closed, how big is it? Well if you do a careful analysis, using the
maximum possible curvature allowed by the best measurements, you find that the universe
can be no smaller than 250 times bigger than the visible universe. So that’s your answer. I mean we’ve always kind of thought that
the universe is big, but now we can hang a number on that. The visible universe, meaning the part of
the universe we can see using our instruments, is a sphere, centered on the Earth and taking
into account the effects of expansion, with a diameter of 92 billion lightyears. However the entire universe, including the
parts we can’t see, is at least 250 times wider than that. And the universe could indeed be infinite
in size. We’ve come a long way from simple speculation
about the universe. Seemingly intractable questions are now getting
answers and, that, is your fascinating fact for the day. Okay, so that was a very cool topic. The thought that we can actually constrain
such things as the size of the universe, including the bits we can’t see is just mind-blowing. You should realize that there is even more
to the conversation because this video didn’t include simply- versus multiply-connected
topologies. But, you know, I had to leave something for
future videos. If you liked what you saw, be sure to like,
comment, and share. And please subscribe to the channel, because
the fact that you’re watching this means that you’re probably my kind of people – the
kind of people who realize that physics is everything.
