Historian Reacts to Evidence for Ancient High Technology in Egypt
Video Statistics and Information
No captions available for this video.
Channel: World of Antiquity
Views: 543,058
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: n_NguZUDku4
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 203min 54sec (12234 seconds)
Published: Sun Nov 21 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
We've moved far beyond the "he's says he wrong so he is stage" and moved on to the "prove it" stage. Let's see this guy cut a 70 ton massive slab from the Aswan using only those pounding stones. Now move them 500 miles, then elevate them to 350 feet. Don't "tell me" how they did it. Show me. History, especially ancient history has become more Dogma than science. A fantastic example was the dogma of when people first crossed into North America https://hakaimagazine.com/features/vilified-vindicated-story-jacques-cinq-mars/ Someone who found clear evidence the dogma was wrong faced nothing but derision and insults for decades. His work is now vindicated and the timeline is now steadily marching backwards further and further. So the consensus was not only wrong, it refused to even look at evidence it was. This isn't science anynore, it's a cult.
This dude jumps in whenever someone tries to deviate from the standard model of history, hate this dude’s content.
What is the need for rebuttal? Each person explains what makes most sense to them.
Regarding "lost technology", I think the dead-end comes from the fact that we want to see traces of contemporary technology in the past. This doesn't have to be the case.
I also don't think the hard, intensive, almost slave like labour with simple hand tools doesn't explain what we see, regardless of how skilled each person was.
It's funny how everyone in the comments disagreeing with this guy just attacks his character and not his arguments.
Interesting how many of the comments in threads when videos like this are posted are flagrant rule 1 violations.
UnchartedX only quotes Christopher Dunn to drive his point across. No more sources? Gotta say WOA is right in his critique.
WoA is uninteresting at best. Tired flaccid mea culpa.
This dude is in it for the clout, clearly. Just like the skaterboi "minuteman" or whatever-- that dude picks and chooses what he agrees and disagrees with, also his opinion is either alternative, or mainstream.. It's confusing, but not a positive thing I know that. We need progression, and not trying to prove other historians/ history buffs wrong for clout.
I’m a bit disappointed in that dude now tbh.