Hegel: A Complete Guide to History

few philosophers have more obviously changed the world than Hegel yeah but of course Wilhelm Frederick keigel has good claim on being the most influential philosopher of all time he's a philosopher of change of progress of history of how our Consciousness itself has changed over time and more than anything he's a philosopher of Freedom every philosopher that came after him has drawn on nor responded to him in some way but more than this the Cold War communist regimes liberal interventionism conservative politics are all marked by the Fingerprints of hegel's bold ideas to know Hegel is to know us to know yourself and as we'll see to really know a word will come to interrogate is a world spanning Soul penetrating painful joyous and fulfilling Journey that will change the way you think his most well-known work 1807's the phenomenology of spirit is a modern epic a heroic story a Heavenly ladder to well absolute freedom and absolute knowledge it's an education that spans the ages a road map to the history of human thought a story about how to become a philosopher and a humble claim to know the mind of God and the universe too he summed up much of what was happening in the opening chapters of the Modern Age what it means to be rational to be empirical to be romantic to be emotional to be modern and religious to be heroic and to do one's duty all at the same time he wanted to unite the individual with the universal [Music] his dense impenetrable infuriating some say just a plain bad writer Some idealize him others despise him but to Journey with him as one commentator has said to take on the task is the most serious thing you can do in your life I want to show you while avoiding complex language as much as possible how Hegel can change how you think can help you see the personal in the historical and the biggest movement in the smallest of actions fellow Travelers will be ancient stoics medieval Christians modern scientists unhappy souls and beautiful ones romantic idealists Napoleon himself the reasonable thinker the servant and the master and we'll do it all by starting from a single simple thought your simple thought and developing it into an entire universe this is also the story of a man lost on the Moors searching for civilization on a journey to find the meaning of human history foreign [Music] by the end of the 18th century the enlightenment had swung wildly between rationalism and empiricism between atheism religion and deism between reason and emotion individualism and communalism culminating in a violent attempt to put philosophy itself into practice the French Revolution for many thinkers of the period Emmanuel Kant had provided the best answers about many of the controversies of the time he argued that we could reason about the world we could think logically but only about what was in front of us only about what we could perceive see smell hear touch with our senses beyond that count says on the big questions about the beginnings of the universe or knowledge of God speculation is folly in a sense count puts up a wall we know what we see we know what we smell and hear and perceive and we could think logically about things like mathematics but we cannot go beyond that in fact Kant says we use our innate reason to construct a representation of the world around us we bring our minds to bear on an object and we recognize it by its properties a leaf is a concept we have made up of greenness leafiness softness born by trees through our reason counting judging analyzing its composite parts we make our idea of a leaf laying all this out to making that case was very bold and new for the religiously infused societies of Europe at the time we do this with everything and I mean everything it goes on behind the scenes but count said we only have limited senses a limited ability to perceive certain spectrums of light and sound certain smells certain sensitivities to the touch other animals have other limited senses but we are all subjective finite limited creatures we cannot really know what can't called the thing in itself we're like worms hitting into rocks literally think about how different a worm's idea of the rock is than ours what evidence do we really have to assume that our perception of the rock is any truer than the worms to some Ultra intelligent species we could be that worm in short for can't our experience is our experience we have a perspective this means we can have truth but not absolute truth and this is where Hegel begins and what he rejects the idea that we cannot access the world in itself Ding and zik in the original German the thing in itself Hegel found this to be counter-intuitive why do we feel like our knowledge of the world is true mistaken sometimes faulty difficult hard-earned but potentially at least true we do feel like as moderns we're progressively painting a more thorough nuanced and accurate picture of the world we know more about the worm and its senses the rock it's perceiving the bird that eats it its digestive system how it flies whether it's healthy for us to eat it or not how to track it with technology we've built and on and on and on we seem to be able to expand our knowledge outwards maybe infinitely and it's this on and on and on this Infinity that hegel's interested in as a romantic in his younger years and being friends with many in the Romantic Movement in Germany he believed that we weren't just mechanical separate things like cogs but that we were part of the universe and the natural world that we are nature reflecting on nature itself we're part of it all this means that there cannot be a separation between us and the world between subject and object between our reason and can't thing in itself because we're a part of it a continuation of it we're formed like clay from it the 17th century philosopher Baruch Spinoza was a big influence here because he also said that we're all made out of the same stuff the same substance Hegel said when one begins to philosophize one must first be a spinozist the soul must bathe itself and The Ether of this single substance in which everything one has held dear is submerged foreign [Music] is to work out the relationship between the substance of the universe the universal that which goes on and on and on and the individual particular finiteness of little old us the philosopher Frederick bazer writes Hegel affirms what Kant denies that it's possible to have a knowledge through pure reason of the absolute or the unconditioned let's pause for a minute and think about that absolute or unconditioned Spinoza was scientifically minded the universe is deterministic causes lead to effects which lead to more causes which lead to more effects the seed grows into a tree the sound wave hits the eardrum the Wind Blows the leaves everything is conditioned by something else to understand the worm you have to understand its relationship to the soil The Wider Moorland the bird that eats it the bird's history where it migrates the physics of flight the biology of breathing to have absolute knowledge we want to know those wider causes more detailed knowledge the contexts the relationships now if we go one way down the line of dominoes we get to the first causes geology chemistry the Big Bang beginnings of the universe questions about God the absolute we follow the finite to the infinite the absolute is a net that's cast as wide as possible for Spinoza the absolute and God and nature were essentially synonyms they meant the same thing it wasn't that God was out there Transcendent separate from the universe God was imminent revealed part of every atom and every thought because all is conditioned by the absolute first cause this is why shelling defined the absolute as that whose existence is not determined through some other thing it's the ultimate answer to the ultimate question but remember count says no stop why are you talking about God and metaphysics and absolute answers philosophy needs to stick to what's directly in front of its senses only then can a true science be built up like Hegel disagreed in fact he said Kant was scared petrified of the thing in itself of going Beyond his own nose can't he said builds a fence a quote boundary between cognition and the absolute because he says he fears it Hegel sees count and Spinoza as two ends of the same problem if the Spinoza we're all part of one substance we all came out of a first cause or to our mind a big bang if we're marbles being knocked about by our desires hungers physics biology then how is it that we seem in our hair that's in our minds to be free to be separate from all of that on the other hand if as Kant argued we're free because we're separate from that world out there that thing in itself the phenomenal world if there's a dividing line like Descartes said between mind and body and the rest of matter then how is it that we interact with the world at all what's the relationship between the in here and the out there bezo writes since Freedom involves Choice the power to do otherwise and since everything in nature is determined such that it's necessary and cannot be otherwise Freedom Is Possible only if it's taken outside the sphere of nature entirely and placed in an intellectual or numeral realm that's what can't code that separate sphere that we seem to have the numeral Realm but this cannot be separate from this cut off like a guillotine it's part of us we're part of this we do stuff stuff's done to us in the world the hegelian question about the subject and the substance how do we get from one to the other how does one become the other [Music] The Romantics had this idea too we're all one but Modern Life neglects this it alienates us from nature from ourselves from different parts of ourselves and from each other the right question should be how do we adequately formulate what this means if we're part of nature what's special about humans what does freedom mean at all alternatively if we are free if we're separate from the cause and effect of the rest of the universe separate from nature what does this mean baser sets the scene for hegel's influence from The Romantics by writing that the Romantic ideal of Excellence of unity with oneself consists of three basic components one totality that a person should develop all of his or her characteristic human powers to Unity that these powers can be formed into a whole or unity and three individuality that this whole or Unity should be individual or unique characteristic of this person alone Hegel is looking for absolute Unity complete knowledge a contented happiness that finds itself not alienated but at home in the world not here in this Barren Place Hegel sees the world as an organic unity and that includes us ideas others animals history and everything else in that history I desire fullness we want to be at home in a way that we don't understand knowledge as something separate from the world subjects with ideas about an object and ideas of something that are ultimately out there separate from us instead we want to have ideas of objects and knowledge that's both true total real connected and mine in short how do we get from this to this thank you we must end at the beginning and begin at the end I want you to imagine the absolute as bathing in the totality of the universe all is one but this also seems like a beginning let me explain it's like we can imagine everything is together in one firework then the firework is set off and we are as individuals one single spark sent spiraling away living brightly then fading dying grasping looking towards the center at all of the other Sparks knowing that we were are can be part of something bigger the beginning is an end that we want to get back to and this points to another part of hegel's Beginnings that people like Kant and Spinoza had got a lot right they were analytical rational meticulous but they were very abstract as if to know what a firework spark is is to analyze its trajectory its brightness its chemistry and combustion none of that explains what it's like to be at a fireworks display what that means [Music] what philosophers seem to have left out is life process history and connecting that analytical piece of knowledge to the totality as a movement Hegel thinks that if we attend carefully to process we can understand how we're part of that great historical movement the phenomenology is a picture gallery of shapes of Consciousness as they move through that process each shape posits an absolutely true shape of Truth puts itself out there risks and asserts itself says this is what I believe about the world one entry point into Hegel is to ask what it means to reflect on the world reflection like a mirror suggests a doubling in thinking about what I think about the world I'm thinking about thinking a kind of circular movement in which Consciousness reflects on itself as self-consciousness reflecting suggests going outside of oneself to look at oneself but also to be outside of the world so as to reflect on the world reflecting suggests a kind of unfolding this is why Hegel is an idealist in the sense that he's thinking about our ideas of the world that all of our experience is shaped like a prism through those ideas and those ideas those shapes of Consciousness shift somehow throughout history the question is how that shifting occurs does it have a logic he's always taking an idea in itself as if it can be meatly and completely filed away in a folder and asking is the way I think about this idea complete and adequate or is there something missing something that I haven't put in the folder beza says that reason must grasp each thing as if it were the entire world as if nothing else existed outside of it hegel's point is that we're limited if we accept things in isolation no discipline set of practices set of ideas job or hobby makes sense on its own we can't understand language from a dictionary the knowledge of The Lumberjack and the meteorologist and the carpenter and the architect don't make sense desperately they rely on each other and knowing how they relate produces a greater more absolute system of thought okay so let's see what we've got so far we've got the limited individual and the total universe or substance the subject and the object the finite and the infinite and the idea that as limited creatures are knowledge between these two rough poles is limited that we cannot know the thing in itself and we have the question of what makes true knowledge of taking what we know completely and absolutely and filing it away in this folder and so this is where Hegel starts we'll follow him now on his journey from simple conscious thoughts to self-consciousness to reason to Spirit to religion and ultimately to Absolute knowing and we'll see how each shape of Consciousness grows from the preceding one [Music] where to start this journey we could like Descartes did ask what is the most certain immediate sure type of knowledge something we can be absolutely sure of that appears to Consciousness simply and clearly no questions asked and by the way we're going to get quite abstract for a moment but bear with it and we'll soon emerge out of the other side into something a bit more concrete Hegel says that as thinking truth-seeking beings we want to know the world immediately there's a sense in which we tend to trust our sensory experience more than other types of knowledge I was there I know what I saw we have a witness immediate knowledge is privileged against mediated knowledge and this difference between immediate and mediated is a fundamental importance for Hegel so let's start with that what he calls sense certainty Hegel presents to us a simple point in space and time a here and a now it's stripped of everything else it's as simple as you can get it's here in space and now in time he calls it the punctual present but he says straight away something odd happens when we try to do this no sooner than I identify a moment in time it recedes and is replaced by another moment in time we constantly have to include a new moment in our concept of numbness we have to expand the idea of Niners however we Define our now he says it's never immediate it's always mediated that now is related to the not now to other knives without a corresponding idea of not now now would be a single totalizing all-encompassing Mass nothing would make sense [Music] to ask what this means we have to be able to say that this now was after the night when I was stood over there and this now was an eye after I picked some grass in other words now exists as a relation and within it there's a positive minus and a negative not nine us the same thing happens with this if we think of a single this nurse we quickly realize we need and not this to understand it a tool otherwise we'd be in this big blank box of thisness for all of time a line is a line by not being a curve Black is Black by not being the white that surrounds it so so far the structure of sense certainty is a this or no and a not this or a not no a positive and a negative included in that definition of positivity this shape of Consciousness seems to have another feature the proposition is I am certain that there is a moment called now and a thing called this think about what's happening when you do this and I really encourage you to do so to try and follow along in your head and try to take notice of how the shapes of Consciousness seem to you we're already missing something we're missing the eye that accompanies the now and the this foreign this means that not only is there a now and a not now a this and a not this together but there's also a me and now and a not now and me this and a not this our absolute sense certainty has three parts then at least and each part seems to leak into the other parts so it seems crucially that there's no such thing as sense certainty it's always mediated by something outside of it I'm certain of this rock going in my folder right now but there's the question of where it came from what's outside the folder and then there's me putting it in the folder this is the beginning of the dialectical process we have to go outside to come back in and we can see that the first proposition that first Shape Of Consciousness the idea that simple direct sense certainty tells us anything or everything has already become something inadequate and then something different we're not going to go through every single Shape Of Consciousness that's not the point anyway and this video is already going to be long enough but Hegel suggests that the next shape is perception sense certainty jumped outside of its confidence in the this and the now in another way it couldn't avoid thinking about particulars and universals by saying this now not that now I have an idea of a universal now a concept of now that all particular knives sit under a category of Niners the same applies to this nurse and as we'll see the same applies to I nurse if I say I sense through my fingers that this is hard because it's not soft I've formed concepts of hardness and softness which aren't about sense certainty but our ideas Concepts universals as it turns out particulars move outside of themselves into universals the media it becomes mediated all attempts at sense certainty turn into Universal ideas Universal contacts and so instead perception tries to look at things as a collection of properties simply this seems hard Brown here now not pink it's got a roundish shape it's not alive I'll call it a rock perception is a gathering of sense certainties into a coherent whole Hegel writes that perceptual objects are a the indifferent passive universality but also of the many properties B simple negation or the one the exclusion of contrary properties in the many properties themselves the relation of the two initial moments perception is a common sense idea that there are holes made up of Parts but the contradiction is already beginning to appear how can a whole be made up of Parts it's not really when we really think about how we're perceiving it it just is and then it's me that's doing the analyzing and breaking it down into parts and putting it back together as a whole there's nothing in the actual object that's doing this I'm saying this is brown rough cold is found here and here too but all of these ideas of properties their relations and universals are really something that's in me the problem with perception for Hegel is that quote the thing is a one reflected into itself it is for itself but it is also for another and moreover it is an other on its own account just because it is for another he says that the object leads a double life that it doesn't quite stand on its own and this is true for everything this rock has a relationship to the ground but only for me the perceiver the tree has the relationship with the wind and the birds but again only I seem to be seeing it this idea that we can perceive an object simply and truly without any relation to outside ideas and Concepts and things quickly seems to fall flat perception is not simple objects exist in a kind of web in relation to other things and like sense certainty we end up going outside of the object to understand it the philosopher Peter kalkovich calls perception ontic liberalism is in an individualistic approach objects and properties cut off from their surroundings but it doesn't seem to work but this makes no sense there are always individual properties related to universals always us there's always relation to other The Rock to the ground the bird to the tree there becomes importantly instantly a lot of background information kalkovich says trying to stay inside an individual thing taking it as something essentially for itself or on its own as absolute pushes me outside the bounds of the thing hegel's profound point is that we often think that direct experience is the purest most immediate most untainted form of knowledge we drill down into the details of the evidential here and now but Hegel reverses this it's in fact the vagust type of knowledge even at the simplest Beginnings we always have to go outside of direct experience to something else to explain that direct experience if we go outside of perception to think of relation we have an idea of a kind of network things are conditioned by other things things interact with one another we explain things in reference to other things things have a history they come from somewhere they often go somewhere we relate heaviness for example to our concept of downness things seem to get pulled to the ground day is warm fire is warm rubbing is warm these concepts are built up together we start to see that there are laws that relate the so-called inside of an object to its outside hardness for example isn't in the object it's a relationship between two objects pushing on each other sand two in fact everything again objects seem to live a double life he says there's something going on behind the scenes that can be understood one of hegel's fundamental Theses is that the particular comes first in existence and the universal comes first in explanation I make sense of this by appealing to a wider Universal idea like lightness or greenness or causality where it's found or summer or the Sun or a bird or photosynthesis and so on kalkovich says by now that this has been so thoroughly mediated that the sensuous world has lost all claim to being independent or for itself something on its own it's now only a flux and play of ever-shifting relations sheer otherness in other words to understand any object and its history we're beginning to have to pack quite a lot in our folder and whatever we put in positively so far seems to be driven in some way by what negates it what's outside of it to simplify if I don't include this tree does not grow in arid conditions because of X and so on then I haven't got absolute knowledge of the tree but hegel's talking about this concrete example in a more conceptual abstract sense remember we're searching for the absolute truth it might be helpful to recall shelling's definition of the absolute as that whose existence is not determined through some other thing if it is determined by something else we have to expand our definition outward the absolute cools us sense certainty was determined by some other thing single objects were determined by some other thing so we keep casting the net wider but in all these shapes of Consciousness so far it's always us casting the net thinking about particular properties and Universal ideas organizing thinking understanding every attempt to find the truth out there in the object fails and so Hegel turns us around to focus instead on us the subject [Music] let's take a little break and think about a question did Hegel have a method Hagel argues that you don't need to impose a method but that if you attend carefully to experience itself to being to logic to ethics a process emerges nonetheless it emerges as movement as organic engine as life and thought itself as we just saw each time Consciousness tries to settle on an absolute way of understanding an object and remember an object here can be anything including an idea the concept we have seems to be propelled on by its own logic Hegel describes a pressing forward or a striving towards quote true knowledge and he talks about this as desire itself that we have an innate desire a love of knowing kalkovich says hegel's goal is to transform philosophy as the love of knowing into actual knowing by having to refer to something outside of itself a concept develops to include what was excluded Hegel says that the result of this dialectical process is quote A New Concept but one Higher and richer than the preceding richer because it negates or opposes the proceeding and therefore contains it and it contains even more than that for it's the unity of itself and its opposite as we move from simple sense certainty to perceiving objects with properties to forces and laws the previous Shape Of Consciousness was what hey Google's sub-lated in the German alphaben this word is difficult to translate because it means to cancel but also to preserve and to lift up sublation is the process through which we take the negation the part that negates the positive definition of the concept and include it in a new shape of the concept he calls it the negation of the negation or determinate negation negation is that which intrudes we could think in terms of fragility what negates the idea of a window a brick smashing through it how to negate that negation make the window stronger what negates life illness how to negate that negation pursue healthiness these are concrete examples but hegel's claim is that if you look carefully at the structure of a concept an idea if not stable will fall apart from within kalkovich says this is the key point that in the genuine dialectical thinking that is the concept thought generates its own content by producing differences from within itself our concept of the world pushes up against the kantian thing in itself but if it's not quite right the real the substance of the universe intrudes and pushes on the edges of our ideas this is dialectical movement one famous book on Hegel is called the restlessness of the negative philosopher Sebastian Gardner writes that the negative is that which is different from opposed to other than negation is for Hegel determinate is determinate as what is negated and the phrase determinate negation figures often hegel's thought characteristically observes the dialectical sequence one affirmation two negation three negation of negation equals affirmation of something new in the first part on Consciousness any attempt to conceptualize the object without referring to myself as involved in the process failed I am that negation without me looking searching touching perceiving the object is nothing which is why Hegel needs to turn to the subject I negate myself as negation by including myself in the process I need to ask what am I doing here what is this process where am I going what does it mean to be self-conscious it's difficult to get your head around Consciousness was a simple subject perceiving an object each time Consciousness did this it realized that there was also a self doing the perceiving try and think about this yourself really try and imagine it in your head in the abstract it's really difficult it's the subject being aware of itself as a subject perceiving an object kind of like this foreign despair despair that it cannot get a grip on simple objects out in the world without thinking about itself and so it turns its attention to itself it sees objects as objects always for another for itself The Taste is for me the image is for me the touch is for me if we're building that absolute knowledge that I is involved in the concept of any object of experience baser says that now this ego wants to show that it is all reality and that everything exists only for it which is true right If we're honest your entire life every experience from a certain perspective is just given to you it's all for you you can't get outside of yourself it's for you and that all of your senses are directed by you and they dictate what your Concepts and experience are you move here look at this smell that what directs this Hegel asks simple will Choice desire Hegel says self-consciousness knows itself only through actions directed by desire My Desire moves me it's like energy it's Restless in doing all the things we did in the Consciousness section I myself in Descartes words become the master and possessor of nature we have a command over objects we can hold them in thought discard them we can destroy or even consume them knowledge is about commanding the world the will is free [Music] but there's already a problem our desire our self-consciousness seems to have no content of its own kalkovich says it's driven from within by a dynamic nothingness that compels me to fill the void that is myself and transform it into a something desire is always desire of some object or idea an X so desire is dependent on something alien to it I want to move my eyes to this object I want to think of this I want to eat this I want to drink that the terrifying realization that while I have command of things I also need things what's incredible about self-consciousness is that it has the same structure that we saw in objects to analyze ourselves we have to jump outside of ourselves two objects if we direct conscious experience to the self back in it's nothing but pure desire and now the thing that negates the self is all other things remember we're talking about an idea of the self pure and simple and so we have to remove trees and Landscape even bodies and ideas from the picture the only way to understand the self is to try and get rid of all thoughts of objects and ideas that are given to it kalkovich says desire is the negative Force by which the self seeks to counsel the otherness of the external World in order to affirm itself as absolute but when I focus on myself after doing this I am nothing I am an empty concept with nothing of my own the selfie says repels itself from itself I am a circle I just equals I hegel's view of self-consciousness is that in searching for a self we find only a rolling conveyor belt of objects and thoughts in Consciousness but this is not a self at all where is this eye it seems to be nowhere and this is one of his bold claims that true self-consciousness requires two self-consciousness is at some point wandering through the desert of self-consciousness we come across an object that we cannot discard destroy or consume another self-consciousness recognition here is fundamental that in seeing someone recognize me I have a concept of myself as recognized I'm now an object myself to myself out there in the world before when I thought of me I thought of empty Consciousness or a train of objects in my thoughts now when I think of me I think of an object an idea of me that the world has too the two selves he says recognize themselves as mutually recognizing one another only in recognizing itself being recognized in another the self-consciousness come out of itself the philosopher Jean hip Elite says when life becomes for me another self-consciousness a self-consciousness which appears to me at once alien and the same a self-consciousness in which desire recognizes another desire and bears on it then in this splitting and reproduction of itself self-consciousness reaches itself this difficult part of the book is integral to Hegel because it's the beginning of spirit the beginning of the idea of I becoming we as a determining object in the world but this is a whole world of trouble for self-consciousness let's return to shelling's formulation of the absolute that whose existence is not determined through some other thing but here I find that the idea of me is determined by other things by my own desire yes but also by objects in the world and by an idea of me that another self-consciousness has I'm trying to prove myself as the basis of everything of all ideas and knowledge but here I have an idea of an eye as an idea that I cannot control Hegel writes for itself it is absolute self-certainty for the other it is a living object an independent thing in the medium of being a given being it is therefore seen as an outside now this disparity must disappear on each side for each self-consciousness is both a living thing for the other and absolute self-certainty for itself the basis of self-consciousness we should recall is desire itself autonomous self-grinding object destroying desire Victor had said of idealism that my will alone shall float audaciously and boldly over the wreckage of the universe but Hegel says each self-consciousness must acknowledge the other as an autonomous subject as something that has an independent existence of its own which therefore it cannot utilize for its own purposes if that object does not of its own accord do what the first does to it as each self-consciousness tries to prove its own desire as absolute this is hegel's famous struggle for recognition the life and death struggle the Hegel claims that I want to see myself recognized by another but that requires keeping the other around and vice versa for the other that is recognized by me they're two self-consciousnesses watching each other registering each other's movements leading following but which one leads which one follows which one is stronger which one has the right ideas he claims that it is only through staking one's life that freedom is one multiple self-consciousnesses ask whose apple is this whose land is this who will dominate when it comes down to it what will I really truly do to prove that I'm the one that's right his idea of recognition has been hugely influential as a kind of proto-psychological theory hip Elite writes historians can cite many causes for the struggle against others but those causes are not the genuine motives of what is essentially a conflict for recognition in short we want to be recognized as free as for ourselves recognition is acceptance by another I stake a claim I move here the other watches it doesn't do anything it recognizes that I've moved I take a Barry I watch the other do the same a country expands its borders someone asks a friend a favor the child goes from being absorbed in the world of conscious experience of objects to a self-consciousness that's own will is opposed to parental Authority we'll push the boundaries of what we can do what will be accepted and recognized by the other we all prod and inspect and poke at boundaries in mutual recognition we build up pictures of what's possible in a world of self-consciousnesses hegel's point is that our idea of autonomy is based on recognition it's inter-subjective it only develops with other selves [Music] and sometimes we get the upper hand and sometimes we don't but for Hegel to truly test the limits of what I can do absolutely requires Going the Distance we end up battling for recognition who can go where who can do what who can win this argument who can win this fight and in the end always one comes out on top and one on bottom one command and one follows one is the master and one is the servant he writes self-consciousness is this standpoint it must resist recognizing another as a free being just as on the other hand each must concern itself with eliciting recognition within the other self-consciousness being posited as an independent being the single self is not able to Bear the others being independent of it so that they necessarily drift into a struggle inevitably one comes out on top the other follows one asks the other answers and throughout history one becomes master and one becomes servant but Hegel says this shape of self-consciousness is unsatisfactory to both the master and the servant if I want to be recognized I want to be recognized by someone I respect otherwise what's the point but the master is only recognized by their servant the servant does what the master commands but the servant is inessential without their own autonomy could be discarded or killed again what's the value in being recognized by a thing that's not valuable worthy respectable we begin to see that autonomy here is complicated because while the servant has lost some of its autonomy its freedom they see that they have their own value they are doing the Masters bidding but have command over the world of objects they know work they know their world they know food and cooking horses and the procedures that they have to get on with in fact they know in some ways more than the master Hegel says that the fear of the Lord is indeed the beginning of wisdom this is characteristic of that hegelian sublation out of fear something that negates comes work attending to the world something that posits something positive and out of that comes Insight out of unfreedom the servant realized that they are free in many ways one of which is their inner life their thoughts Spinoza said that the thing is said to be free which exists solely from the necessity of its own nature and is determined to action by itself alone and so while Consciousness may not be recognized as free maybe Limited in where it can go what it can say how it acts one thing is quote determined to action by itself alone thinking [Music] Hegel begins exploring historical examples as self-consciousness becomes inter-subjective that is the I that is we in other words it's only then that Consciousness becomes a historical being in the proper sense but it also inevitably becomes a historical being history begins to happen to Consciousness with the master servant relationship history becomes about domination but also inward reflection on the nature of Freedom inter-subjectively he points to stoicism and skepticism in the ancient world as a response to this kind of shape of Consciousness autonomy is contradicted everywhere self-consciousness is not free but is pushed and pulled around by forces exterior to it in response the stoic and the skeptic turn inwards into their own Fortress of Solitude they say no to everything deny that everything outside of them is essential to them they cut themselves off from the world saying to themselves that the only thing that can be relied on the only thing that they have that is free is their own thought they searched for what the Greeks called ataraxia unperturbedness for the stoic he says the principle is that Consciousness is a thinking being and that something is essential for it or is true and good only insofar as Consciousness conducts itself in it as a thinking being the stoic says it doesn't matter what happens to me from the outside I am absolute I can choose what to think about he says whether on the throne or in Chains in the utter dependence of its individual existence its aim is to be free and to maintain that lifeless indifference which steadfastly withdraws from the bustle of existence [Music] skeptic on the other hand holds new content of their own they also turn inwards away from the world it's just yes but what about or no I don't believe that because of X everything is a confused medley the dizziness of perpetually self-engendered disorder stoics and Skeptics negate everything that's posited to them he writes that point out likeness or identity to it and it will point out unlikeness or non-identity and when it is now confronted with what it has just asserted it turns around and points out likeness or identity its talk is in fact like the squabbling of self-willed children the stoic looks around and in Rome Hegel says the world is sunk in Melancholy its heart is broken in another work he calls ancient Rome the universal unhappiness of the world this is he says the Dark Knight of the Soul self-consciousness is hopeless disillusioned [Music] and the Skeptics use the world as contingent changing uncertain nothing is universally unchangeably true if I say this is hard you say Well only to you if I say this is tasty you say it's disgusting if I say a bottle is something that carries liquid you say well it's still a bottle without the liquid in it nothing is universally unchangeable except its own self-consciousness that is a thread running through this is the rise of a new shape the unhappy Consciousness yearns for certainty and wisdom but it's in a miserable State it's cut off from the world and uses its own self to question everything it experiences it experiences a world of bondage and despair and uncertainty but it also has a feeling of certainty it knows itself it knows its power Hegel says this new form is therefore one which knows that it is the Dual consciousness of itself as self-liberating unchangeable and self-identical and as self-bewildering and self-perverting and it is the awareness of the self-contradictory nature of itself the unhappy Consciousness is the consciousness of self as a dual natured merely contradictory being section talks of working acting willing and giving thanks he talks about a changeable inessential the contingent and the unchangeable universal here's a key difficult Passage to both of these moments the feeling of its wretchedness and the poverty of its actions is linked to the consciousness of its Unity with the unchangeable for the attempted direct destruction of what it actually is is mediated by the thought of the unchangeable and takes place in this relation to it and will bring Consciousness itself to an awareness of its Unity with the unchangeable okay let's take an example in acting to satiate hunger we hunt in the same place for example we're hungry we hope the same method Works each time we desire the unchangeable universal idea of finding deer here but the skeptic unhappy Consciousness doesn't know whether food is not there one day it senses deceive it another day we forget where to go another in short we're limited creatures but we have an idea of the universally guaranteed act and knowledge the absolute truth but it's beyond us [Music] and so this realm of platonic like forms arrives on the scene of the unchangeable the perfect the Godlike the absolute this is why Hegel says we give thanks to the unchangeable kalkovich says the unhappy Consciousness more than any other spiritual shape reveals the problem that must be solved if man is to achieve absolute Divine knowing it's here that religion comes in for the first time if I can be skeptical about everything but I know that there isn't everything an absolute Universal there must just have faith a pure feeling through the heart he says the unhappy Consciousness fills their own feebleness as sinful and puts their faith in a god of the universal we renounce our being for self we renounce money property we renounce gluttony we're ashamed of ourselves and our limited selfhood and look towards the universal idea everything comes from this Universal Beyond now a mediator comes on the scene a priest they claim that they have the special connection to the universal we sacrifice our own will and put it in the hands of the priest a mediator between the singular limited person and the universal infinite God the absolute you giveth and the absolute you take us away it's here that Hegel starts to analyze Christianity Consciousness posits a god that is gone not present that I as an unhappy Consciousness cannot have access to Basil writes the death of Christ means that God has withdrawn from the world and that there are no longer direct mediators between individual and God hence the unhappy Consciousness in the death of Despair concludes that God himself is dead but this cannot stand remember for Hegel the absolute is not Transcendent not separate out there but imminent it runs through everything we cannot be separate from God secularized or theological because God contains all relations within is omnipresent omnipotent in the priest we see a Unity between the particular and the universal kalkovich says this comes about because the priest as representative of the universal church has absolute certainty that he speaks for God for the universal he enjoys a privileged universalized individuality Hegel rejects traditional Christianity because it separates the self from the Transcendent the priest still interprets interprets biblical texts moral decisions Community matters weddings funerals the priest cannot be a skeptic the priest cannot be a stoic the priest acts the priest in a strange way is the most reasonable person in an unhappy world this is the power and the importance of the historical category of the priest [Music] what is reason it's a more difficult question than it first appears was reason really the spirit of the age the Zeitgeist of the Enlightenment this is a difficult transition that we don't really have time to cover in detail and is open to a wide range of interpretations so instead I'll raise two points that Hegel makes the first is that the unhappy Consciousness cannot successfully separate themselves from the universal I.E God because as Hegel writes in this movement it has also become aware of its Unity with this Universal a Unity which for us no longer Falls outside of it in other words I do I will I think not as a finite being but as one that engages with universal ideas the second important point is that for Hegel the unhappy Consciousness has some similarities with kant's idea of reason and that's because reason as a shape of Consciousness arises out of a religious way of thinking both posits are beyond that separate a privileged place that's split apart from The Real World the unhappy Consciousness says I am nothing God is everything the reasonable person says the world is nothing reason is everything both posit to similar structural relationship between the particular and the universal the finite and the infinite [Music] if we take medieval Christianity which many have argued is what Hegel was talking about when he was thinking about his unhappy Consciousness the regulating idea is that Jesus has died God has abandoned us we might reach heaven but we're sinful we're stuck here on Earth and the spiritual is transcendent it transcends everyday experience it's beyond separate above unreachable compared with the concrete here and now and for can't reason is Transcendental which is slightly different to transcendent in a way count agreed with the religious person that when we think in universals we're doing something pretty special that separates us from the Earthly world he believed that because we're creatures that possess rationality we're able to take the particularity of the finite world and systematize it in a transcendental way that thinks in Universal Concepts yes this grass is here and now but it fits into my Universal idea of what grass is but for can't there was still a separation between that real thing called grass in front of me remember for can't I only know it through my own human faculties and through my transcendental reason so I don't know what it's really like to be grass or what grass is really like or how a worm or a bird or an alien or a super sensible being understands grass and grassiness both are unhappy Consciousness and County and reason separate us from the world and Hegel to put it simply says no for him reason cares it's engaged it's part of the world it cries The World Is Mine it strides forward Hegel says and plants the sign of its sovereignty on every height and in every depth now Hegel agrees with count about a lot Kant thought we had that framework that we fit our experience of the world into because without it the world would not make sense it's a chaotic mass of data and information half a billion photons for example hit the retina each second how do we make sense of all of this without some kind of organizing set of folders an operating system to fit everything into the basis of this Kant says is that we can count recognize differences think in terms of cools and effect and these things are baked into us a priori before experience in shorts this operating system is ours but it bends along with our senses how we perceive the world we are stuck viewing the world through our framework to know the thing in itself is impossible but remember Hegel says that can't build a boundary between cognition and the absolute because he fears it counts is criticized as an abstract formalist he says we need to experience the world to fit it into our framework but still like a coward says we cannot really connect to that world Hegel points out that we need the thing in itself that the dialectical process takes the logic of the thing in itself and slowly unfolds in a relationship to it can't might be right that our perspective bends the world but for Hegel he neglects to explore how the perspective is throughout history and through logic unbent he looks at Enlightenment reason and says I want to know about falling bodies chemical reactions animals plants planets how the human body works and much more knowledge for him is directed towards the essence of things qua things through reason we are deeply implicated in the world but we're already seeing a contradiction that we first saw with Consciousness I study the world carefully empirically I study geology oceanography meteorology zoology chemistry physics I look at all those particulars and through my reason I Rise once again to universals I see the rabbit has sharp teeth not because of what it knows itself but because of its wider relationship to the environment the concept of food to the idea of sustenance or the idea of sharpness itself reason is already beginning to get away from the empirical World reason develops Concepts that stand above life reason becomes something more than simple empirical nature in our study of nature we see that animality falls from its Universal from Life directly into the singleness of Dar sign or being there and the moments of simple determinateness and the single organic life United in this actuality produce becoming only as a contingent movement in other words the universal The Wider is what matters the rabbits gnawing into the carrot with his sharp teeth is a chance moment a contingent moment it could disappear and The Wider rules would still apply to another type of sharpness to another rabbit to another type of food and his point is that the rabbit has no idea why it has sharp teeth The Rock has no idea why trees can't grow on it the bird has no idea about the physics of flight but reason does Hegel says that nature has no history his point is that reason seems to organize what it empirically studies into a wider and wider system of thought that goes beyond alphaben simple nature it's something more than it but reason does something else too we try to use reason to study reason itself in the same way that self-consciousness tried to study self-consciousness so reason looks inwards it comes home to itself but when we look for reasons within kalkovich writes what do we see not logical Ducks all in a row but in the words of William James a booming bustling confusion of this half thought that memory this regret that image is reason reasonable or do we see quote given circumstances situation habits Customs religion and so on reason in other words sees Two Worlds the eight word phenomenal one that seems to comply reasonably to the laws of cause and effect to physics chemistry biological processes and so on but then we look inwards at our own psychologies and we don't see much of this at all we see passion we see Freedom we see Choice the term psychological necessity Hegel says when we turn in words thus becomes an m T phrase for Hegel reason isn't cold and detached it's interested it's subjectified it has a Persona it becomes romantic it has motivations it's both reaching out into the world and embodied in US kalkovich says I go out into the world not to observe but to act to make rather than find myself reason wants to be happy it finds that to perfectly reasonable thing to do but it wants to see its own happiness manifested in the world around it this is why Romanticism and Enlightenment to so closely intertwined both revolt against unjust and irrational laws made by arbitrary Aristocrats and monarchs Rousseau comes along and talks of the law of the heart reason feels itself to be right I know I am right because I feel it others are cold-hearted others don't understand others don't know how I feel about doing this thing but Hegel says the Consciousness that sets up the law of its heart meets with resistance from others because it contradicts the equally particular laws of their hearts we all want our own things we all feel we are right and so morality cannot come from the inner heart instead can't invert morality and describes it as what is universalizable morality isn't a warm feeling but a rational calculation the law of the heart becomes the law of Duty I give myself over to the idea that what is right can only be what can be made into a universal rule my own desires are suppressed I submit to the discipline of the universal we see the same finite infinite logic again I have what I want to do and what we should all do I want to sit on the sofa and do nothing but we all have to help out with tidying up the idealist posits a world where we all do the right thing the problem for the idealist although virtue is on their side is that they have to suppress their selfish desires their individuality what if I don't want to be nice today what if they want to sit around what if you don't want to work at the moment The World Isn't animated by Duty by ideas and idealism by Universal Rules by abstract ideas it's Hegel says animated by individuality and so virtue is brought back down to earth in a similar way to unhappy Consciousness realizing that the universal inevitably moves through the individual the particular the finite the idealist says don't be selfish selflessness is virtue selflessness is the ideal selflessness is the universal aspiration the idealist says the world would be a better place if everyone was self-less but here Hegel introduces its negation what he calls The Way of the World The Way of the World Whispers sometimes you need to be selfish [Music] selfish nurse can be good as we all act in self-interest sometimes in working hard to earn a living to be comfortable for example selfish nurse is the same as selflessness the particular individual interest is the same as the universal wider communal ideal selflessness is contradictory because we are after all selves because we're connected in this wider system we're all being for another at the same time as being for ourselves high-minded out there idealism becomes physical down here action idealism must get its hands dirty kalkovich says action itself is the good as individualized universality the cultivation of gifts capacities and strengths becomes the end itself and so reason here becomes embodied in active reason reason again is interested in the world for its own good and for the good of the rest reason even impositing a universal idea of say selflessness must act that selflessness out through the self the dialectic posits the universal then returns again to the particular active reason becomes self-confident it uses its reason to act it doesn't need Kings or priests to tell it what to do it's modern I have my interests my activities my reasons for acting we make ourselves little Gods using the gifts and talents that we have we use our own individual talents for the good of The Wider world [Music] I see the good in being a stone Mason in building houses for everyone in helping in a universal idea then I return to myself and I do it I posit a universal ideal of something like stone masonry again I'm using a concrete example and then I return through myself into the particular instance of doing it [Music] but something new nags at me carpentry is a universal idea there are lots of Carpenters what am I can I not just be replaced does the universal idea really speak through the particular me kalkovich says I become a ripple in the talent pool the Ripple is nothing it's gone and the pool remains what is this pool how do I relate to it I build and chop wood and construct musical instruments but then they're gone off into the pool for other people to use to do what they will with we're just cogs in a machine a single subject being moved around by the Invisible Hand of the market from this kalkfich says reason learns that my action cannot be mine alone and that what is for me must also be for others Eagles time there wasn't much of an intellectual idea of what social Consciousness was there was no concept of the unconscious for example there was no idea of pre-conscious experience there was no sociology either Rousseau had only just come up with the idea of a general will it's difficult then to pin down precisely what Hegel means by Geist because really it's the entire process but the philosopher RC Solomon writes that what clearly emerges from hegel's writings is that Geist refers to some sort of General Consciousness a single mind common to all man we can start by thinking about self-consciousness needing to self-consciousness is then her traditions and Customs arise from there we can see what Hegel calls the unity of different independent self-consciousness is or the I that is we and we that is I Geist or spirit is that I that is we it's Consciousness going outside of itself but still finding itself in the Universal work of all and then the universal returning back into Consciousness it describes not just the social idea but the movement of a social idea Visa says that spirit is when finite selves become conscious of themselves as infinite and when the infinite becomes self-conscious through finite selves the infinite is the concept of the I not this eye or that eye but these eyes the concept of the eye that goes beyond itself but returns to itself to think use act and understand hip Elite writes the phenomenology sets itself a double task to lead naive Consciousness to philosophical knowledge and to lead individual Consciousness to emerge from its would-be isolation it's exclusive being for self so as to raise it to Spirit hegel's point is that by thinking through the infinite eye we become something more than this particular eye in other words hey Google looks to the Persians Egyptians China and other civilizations but for Hegel ancient Greece is the beginnings of world history he says that in Greece the we ethical life was experienced like sense certainty as a simple thisness what he describes as the unwritten and infallible law of the Gods here he says is ethicality or the we in its simplest purest form it's childlike naive but beautiful the Greeks just take their communal ethical life as it is not something to be analyzed or questioned it's something that they just do that they live in that they bathe in that they are for Hegel Greek ethical life was harmonious and balanced there was a simple Freedom each individual was a law unto himself what he calls a beautiful individuality and there was a simple Palace for the briefest of moments Democratic ancient Greece was idyllic it was like a work of art in which all of the elements come together harmoniously in Balance each had a democratic right to participate in the Affairs of government and other than that were left to their own devices but Greeks lived for the state the state came first when it had to he said the Greeks and their immediate actuality lived in the happy middle between both self-conscious subjective freedom in the ethical substance but while all seems whole he says reason here must withdraw from its happiness like sense certainty things just cannot be this simple there are several contradictions that led to its decline Greece was a slave Society slaves and women could not participate in public life Freedom was defined as self-sufficiency which mostly meant not being a slave as Aristotle says it is the mark of a free man not to live at another's Beck and cool there was also no way for Greek city-states to grow for a universal idea of citizenship they couldn't incorporate conquered territories like the Romans did and face-to-face democracies needed to be small to function Hegel says Democratic Constitutions are possible only in small states in states that do not exceed the extent of a city by very much living together in a city the circumstance of seeing one another daily make possible a common education and a vital democracy and the philosopher Terry Pinkard has written because of the necessity of the ideal of self-sufficiency the police had to be small enough to enable face-to-face interaction this made the Greek police too small to defend itself and when another well-organized powerful Empire showed up at its door it no longer had the power motivational or otherwise to resist third there were no mediating institutions between the individual and the collective the ethical the police the collective was considered absolute for the Greeks the police dealt with the collective and the family were left to deal with their own problems but what's decided politically goes unquestioned the tensions that arose from this can be seen in the Greek playwright Sophocles play Antigone Creon the ruler of Thieves decrees that polynesis is to be held to blame for betraying the city and fighting his brother in the thebian Civil War he demands that Antigone polonisi's sister leave polynesi's dead body to rot on the battlefield rather than be buried burial though was divinely important for the Greeks it quote what's the blood relation to the bosom of the earth so creon's decree was the severest punishment imaginable so Antigone ignores it she cannot leave her brother to rot it goes against everything she believes in in this Hegel sees a contradiction between two laws public human law the law of the ruler or the police or the collective and the Divine Right that families and individuals also felt compelled to live by each sees the other as wrong and their own law is absolute kalkovich says each nose in the sense of recognizing as absolute only one side of the law and consequently neither knows the whole of divine right it's the best example of Greek tragedy because both the right and both are wrong they're stuck Antigone commits suicide and Creon goes into Exile because they both feel correctly that they're guilty Hegel sees this story as archetypal of the problems of ancient Greece Pinkard writes even the most ordinary citizen would have to be able to think for himself about which law the Divine or the human law or even which among many Divine laws he was required to follow that left citizens at odd with themselves and potentially at odds with each other but the idea of freedom was the Breakthrough and the beginning of the idea that whereas previously only one was free a ruler and everyone else followed now many slaves and women excluded mind could be free together for Hegel following on from the master servant relationship Freedom consists in recognition recognition that as a free man as an Athenian one had certain rights as ancient Greece declines Hegel writes Greek ethical life is the historical Edom from which Modern Man Has Fallen [Music] foreign [Music] learned something from all of this individuality is important Rome developed a complex legal system the individual had certain rights to property and the right to a trial in Rome citizenship was granted to some conquered territories as Rome expanded through this system Rome could grow in a way Greece could not for the first time the idea of being a citizen was potentially Universal theoretically certain aspects of citizenship was open to all even women could legally own property and even someone from a distant City could become a citizen with rights that were protected Rome could create a universal mission in a way that Greek city-states could not but Rome was orientated around the idea of Conquest that was its purpose Hegel thinks that without Conquest there were few ethical public communal we principles holding the spirit of Roman life together he said that Roman Life lacked content the Greeks found meaning and purpose in public life in a way that Romans could not Pinkard writes that what it denied was something like the necessity of having abounded social space that provided its members with a fundamental orientation in life that is a social space in which determinate goods are available to people which are made up of the elements of a common way of doing things and institutions transmitting that into practical knowledge of the world Greek was poetic Rome pragmatic Greece warm Rome cold power and meaning voices decisions the Zeitgeist was centralized in the will of the Roman Emperor the lord of the world as Hegel calls them Pinkard writes for the Roman shape of life being a subject was simply being a member of the Roman legal order with all of its complicated divisions among local laws Imperial laws and the like there was no further Essence as it were to subjectivity this is why for Hegel stoicism Rises out of Rome it was natural for Romans to want to distance themselves psychologically from the arbitrariness the brutality the slavishness of the Roman world and instead focus on inner life inner thought inner virtue this was both an insight and a contradiction of Rome But ultimately it contributed to its collapse the ancient world's problem was that they struggled with the question of how individuals come together into a collective cohesive whole but they did at least begin to pose the question they made it one of importance one that we should think through kalkovich writes that the absence of an ethical whole is the soil out of which culture grows what does culture have to do with Spirit the idea of what it means to be cultured is important to Hegel it's a question of meaning what does it mean to be Greek to be Roman to be Christian to be cultured means to leave my individuality and become something else to become cultured is to become something that comes from the we something spirited to be civil to become polite to speak French to read prayers to think about custom and laws to become a universal being culture speaks quite clearly of that divide between individuality and universality remember though for Hegel we're talking about the idea of culture a construct that we posit ourselves he says it's that which consists precisely in being conscious of two different worlds and which Embraces both and so he calls it self alienated spirit it's both external and internal but because it's an idea the external is internal too it's the self's alienation from itself positing its own negation as outside of itself but as part of its ethical Constitution how it thinks he writes nothing has a spirit that is grounded within itself and indwelling but each is outside itself in something alien when we think about the out there of communal Spirits we go outside of ourselves in ourselves but what We crave what we desire what fuels dialectical movement is the idea of subject and object individual and culture being one so that we feel no painful divide between our own desires and what's imposed culturally what Consciousness wants kalkovich says is that through the general will the individual obeys laws that he himself has authorized law in this sense is not external to the individual but emanates from him this is evident in the enlightenment when it was argued that it wasn't Kings or gods or even tradition that was the source of right that people themselves that we as eyes together are the source of culture the source of rights and ideas of Liberty equality and fraternity as the French revolutionaries said in this they are Universal and individual at the same time for Hegel culture leads to thinking morally and morality is where we find the self and the universal United he writes like culture and Faith morality is absolute mediation as a moral self-reflective being I make myself other than myself the central example is kant's categorical imperative Kant said that I should make my actions conform to a universalizable rule so as to ask what would happen if everyone I.E the universal did this what if everyone stole what if everyone lied what if no one was generous the eye that is we is one motivated by Duty for getting the immediate sensuous here and now the pull of pleasures and individual desires and thinks instead about the larger Universal idea Hegel says self-consciousness knows duty to be the absolute essence but here's where we get that hegelian inversion if I can't acting dutifully doing the right thing is a product of our reason a become a carpenter say because the town needs houses and chairs and tables it's a universal need that I dutifully fulfill but Hegel says this leads to a new problem what about me what about my desires my impulses my inclinations my needs didn't we learn from previous shapes of Consciousness that there's no Universal object out there without looking at the subject in here counts morality has much in common with the unhappy Consciousness it deposits the good in some transcendental region that is almost separate from me instead Hegel says we must look for the source of culture morality the good and Duty within it must align with our own impulses our own individual ideas our own talents wants and personal preferences Duty must become an individual Drive rather than an abstract thought personal will and communal Duty must become the same he says it's now the law that is for the sake of the self not the self that's for the sake of the law we see this expressed in the great interest in Emotion passion and moral sentiment during the Enlightenment we forget that this was a period of individual expression and an interest in overflowing emotion as much as it was about reason we need to place morality so that it aligns with the individual's desire the driving force of spirit we need incalkovich's phrase a moral Will To Power we see this idea most notably in hegel's admiration of Napoleon Napoleon the Hegel at least is the embodiment of both Enlightenment values and individual Glory he called him the world soul on Horseback he was concrete moral Spirit he acts from intuition and conviction but he's not a king or a priest he's self-made he creates his own world we return to Victor's phrase my will alone shall float audaciously and boldly over the wreckage of the universe [Music] but we've returned again to the subject with no concrete object ethics morality the we all arises from the eye kalkovich nicely summarizes hegel's dance with Spirit Greek ethicality fails because it cannot incorporate the serpent of knowledge into the garden of custom piety and Trust modernity Falls because man eats from the Tree of knowledge and becomes as we shall see perverse self-alienated and ultimately life denying as a so-called Beautiful Soul hegel's chapter on Spirit thus slaves bear the fundamental problem of the modern world how to reconcile substance and subject to infuse life with knowledge and knowledge with life [Music] hegel's interpretation of religion is where he is both most profound and probably the most controversial today for some this is where hegel's metaphysics becomes outdated to others it's integral to the entire system what this means is that for non-metaphysical hegelians we can focus on his ideas about dialectics and change Etc as something going on in here but for metaphysical hegelians that part makes no sense without acknowledging that it rests on wider more fundamental metaphysical beliefs about the nature of God the universe time and so on foreign [Music] so far is that starting from the simplest of ideas about an experience a process emerges or unfolds however it's only as we grasp that process towards the end that we see that the unfolding makes sense from a wider point of view that you cannot see from the beginning it's like looking around on the ground and then slowly zooming out and seeing the Earth from space in many ways it's about reversing the idea of the concept in your head what if rather than the finite leading to the infinite it's the infinite that's drawing out the finite all along beckoning it attracting it like a force Whispering this is what's reasonable rational logical this is what makes sense this is the way we should go [Music] substance empties itself through time it becomes more complex Fuller more concrete more realized what does this have to do with religion well Hegel makes the case that it's a perfectly rational result of reason as it unfolds what's significant about the religious Shape Of Consciousness is that it's almost proto-rational it's a shape of reason as reason proper unfolds from it he says it's the shape of abstract Spirit Made Concrete in the form of myths stories Community morality festivals procedures routines it brings people together as Spirit to ask the most fundamental metaphysical Universal and ethical questions about God and the universe as such we tend to forget its importance today the philosopher Robert Wicks commenting on all of the previous shapes of Consciousness as Hegel realized that none of these forms either intrinsically or explicitly are oriented towards foundational realities of a metaphysical kind none are inherently geared towards the deepest human questions that concern our presence in the universe and the meaning of existence religious communities embody this kind of awareness in hegel's View and in this respect are more advanced in Social awareness than moral and political communities we thus pass from Spirit to religion he moves through many world religions commenting on Art and statues and myths and beliefs but for Hegel Christianity albeit a modified Christianity is the most important writing as he is towards the end of the Enlightenment he sees attacks on religion all around him don't follow blindly it says use your own reason the church is corrupt the Bible is full of error but the enlightenment fails to see something integral it too has a foundation based on faith the enlightenment says God is but an image in your mind the creation of humans religion is an idea just a picture but it fails to see that for reason two the world is a product of the human Mind perceiving through subjectivity through its own reasons all of our perspectives are based on Concepts and ideas reason and empiricism cannot tell us anything about first causes or the nature of God because it focuses on the Here and Now foreign what enlightenment declares to be an error and a fiction is the very same thing as Enlightenment itself is on the other hand the enlightenment can bring religion back down to Earth because the enlightenment quite illuminates that Heavenly world of Faith with ideas belonging to the world of sense and points out this finitude that faith cannot deny again here he makes his characteristic inversion he asks what's theological about science and what's scientific about theology what's finite about the infinite what's Universal about the particular this is where his critique of traditional Christianity comes in what he means is that faith is not Transcendent separate up there in heaven or in an afterlife not just about universality and Infinity but is invested in and through the finite through people objects habits images art the sensuous the immediate here at night but on the other hand the finite the finite eye is always going beyond the immediate here and now thinking the universal the Eternal the infinite positing theorizing hypothesizing both turning on the same wheel it's also the case that Enlightenment is new and abstract and religion is old and full of the concrete kalkovich says whereas Enlightenment is nascent and empty faith is long-standing and full of content Insight must be invented whereas Christian faith has been around for centuries and is what he's arguing is that reason reaches out for full knowledge of substance but substance is God God and substance are just the totality of all things of all meaning and so the shape of reason of truth of knowledge can be found everywhere in history in culture in religion but this is where he makes his deeper critique of Christianity substance unfolds through everything but as subjects we are part of that substance we've been torn from it separated from it in some way so that we're subjects perceiving substance but the universe perceiving itself the ultimate question is to make sense of this Gap why has the universe separated itself from itself why is it reflecting on itself what we are is a process of the objective World moving beyond being merely objects in themselves and becoming self-aware we are how in calcavid's phrase life becomes knowledge what is knowledge if not the universe waking up what does this have to do with Christianity being rational Hegel argued that this gap of the subject partially separated from substance but moving back towards it is the framework of Christianity we are both part of God made from God but separate from God and become responsible for our own salvation we learn this from God himself who separates himself in the form of Jesus and teaches us about our finite sinfulness but in dying for them too and dying for us shows us that this is also his God's suffering kalkovich says that Christ is a religious symbol for Spirit at work in time and history if substance is to reflect on itself as subjects if the universe is going to have knowledge of itself then God as substance must separate itself from itself and this can be seen metaphorically or not in the story of Christianity foreign [Music] ology is The Logical story of a God who empties himself into time for our own benefit but in doing this God himself must suffer Hegel says that without the world God is not God and kalkovich writes the phenomenology is thus The Logical reconstruction of God's suffering in time it's the process by which God comes to know himself and fully be himself in an early work Hegel posed as the ultimate goal of philosophy what he called the speculative Good Friday and this also contains the logic of why forgiveness is essential to Christianity because God or substance is infinite and all-knowing and we are finite and limited it follows that we have limited knowledge limited ideas limited senses and so we are inevitably going to get things wrong make mistakes we're all going to sin so forgiveness is essential to finite human life Jesus dies to show us this to show that God is implicated in this to teach us that forgiveness is necessary and to teach us that God in separating itself from itself suffers with us Christianity in short is the humanization of the Divine Essence [Music] what do you have when you understand the dialectical process has just laid out how do you think when you understand the logical shapes of Consciousness self-consciousness reason Geist and religion what happens when you comprehend where you stand and understand what your place is in this great unfolding you have speculative philosophy absolute knowing is that speculative philosophy but now it's systematic the science what the Germans called visenshaft during hegel's time science didn't just mean how we think of science today empirical science experiments inventions physics and so on science and philosophy were still used interchangeably visenshaft was about the systematization of knowledge and that included ethics metaphysics and so on it was the idea that all could be understood if placed on adequate foundations as a full scientific philosophical system absolute knowing knows that all is in a process of becoming under a certain systematicity Wix writes that as time goes on everything becomes more integrated unified rational balanced free reconciled and self-aware absolute knowing understands the rationality of all previous shapes of Consciousness as the self-differentiating work of the concept it's the perspective of the concept that knows itself as concept as Hegel says what is a concept it's not just the universal ideas that I have chairs are objects for sitting cats and mammals with fur and four legs democracy is governance by the people but it's the question of the development of the concept as a dialectical process between the finite object and the absolute idea in which all concepts are Incorporated and makes sense and understand itself as the concept in his encyclopedia Hagel writes philosophy is a knowledge through Concepts because it sees that what on other grades of Consciousness is taken to have being and to be naturally or immediately independent is but a constituent stage and the idea a concept in short is what contains all the earlier categories of thought merged in it it's important to say that this doesn't mean knowing everything an impossibility but the awareness of a shape of Consciousness that is itself aware of the process of knowing the shape of knowing desire as the shape of knowledge itself once you understand how Concepts relate to one another sense can be made of them this applies to thinking through what democracy means why a journey from the Wilderness happened in the way that it did how a weather system works history itself and how each fits with the other and with the process of thought as desire kalkovich writes the phenomenologist must first identify the shapes of knowing that a spread out in time and then reorganize them to bring out their logically necessary connections think about your own life things that you did that sometimes only make sense in retrospect but with some insights and Analysis and some self-understanding you can work out why you did the things you did what was important what was formative what wasn't and you can string it all together with some perspective at the end kalkovich says absolute knowing is when the self is finally transparent to itself through all previous shapes it knows that it is the truth of substance and substance is the truth of it absolute knowing Rises out of religion retains the truth of the shape of religion while reconfiguring it as philosophy Christianity for all of its truth and shape for all the good it's done still thinks of God as separate it misunderstands itself [Music] absolute knowing knows that the thinking subject is divine Wix writes that art in hegel's view characteristically expresses the deepest interests of humanity in an external sensory form religion characteristically expresses them through sensuous mental imagery and feeling philosophy does so in pure Concepts for Hegel previous forms of Consciousness were engaged in what he called picture thinking there was truthfulness but because the ideas were complex they were expressed in things like religious images and ceremonies art and sculpture the philosopher of absolute knowing interprets the previous shapes of Consciousness philosophically conceptually and in doing this that division between subject and object between reason and can't's thing in itself between the finite and the infinite dissolves into a Unity kalkovich writes it's replaced by the unity of pure thinking which communes only with itself and at the same time expresses all that is it is subject that knows itself as the enduring substance of all things self becomes object an object becomes self it's a reminder again that we are the universe and if the unfolding of the universe the unfolding of the relationship between subject and object leads to the development of knowledge about the universe then there's meaning and purpose to history but its meaning and purpose that can only be seen after the Myriad of different shapes and events battles and processes ideas and actions have happened only then only at dusk only at the end of the day can we look as an observer over and above what's happened and say this might have happened because of this and this idea relates to this concept and I can move forward with understanding he said the Owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of the dusk only after things have happened can we look retroactively only then can some kind of sense be made out of what's occurred there's a pattern but it's a messy one reason he says is cunning Hegel meant the Journey of the phenomenology to be but an introduction a preface to his system of mature works is science of logic and philosophy of right his work on ethics and political philosophy because what it is really is a great biography of philosophy a painting of thought itself calculus spirit is like an artist engaged in self-portraiture and what emerges from the portrait is something so big so all-encompassing that it becomes open to an unfathomably wide range of interpretations Hagel is claimed as an ally a Defender a thinker of Christianity of post-christianity of modernity itself of the conservative 19th century Prussian state of Marxism of the liberal 19th century Prussian state of liberalism of modern conservatism of well anything you can think of maybe except Simplicity atomization of the idea that we can think locally without any reference to the whole which is why Wick says what's slowly emerging from this consideration of hegel's influence is that he is among the most powerful Advocates of social integration and equality on a global scale of course critics would and do say that he's eurocentric or that in integration on a global scale is precisely what we need less of that what arises out of it is a dialectic of domination or a justification of horrific events in history as reasonable and over the last century or so it's become fashionable to agree with the metaphysical side of hegel's work the bits on God and spirits and wider ideas about the meaning of time and space in the universe others have argued that without those parts there's no Hegel at all he makes no sense and there's also been a Resurgence of hegelianism partly because of Marx and Marxism and a desire to understand the 20th century but partly I think as well because there's a cunning return of a taste for the bigger questions for broader meaning for metaphysics for synthesis for interdisciplinary ideas people say that there's a feeling that something might have gone wrong in partitioning the world up into self-contained subjects and scientific experiments and individual Pursuits or singular focus on data on the empirical on individualizing everything on neoliberalism on secularization because I think when you go back to Beginnings in science when you go back to First knowledge first books or writings First Art first Consciousness first life first planets first Sons first atoms first big bang first space first time and really try and grapple with what that means you get to a scientific metaphysical moment that's not too different from the lines that Hegel chooses to end the phenomenology with from his friend Schiller they go friendless was the Great Master of the world he felt a lack and so he fashioned Spirits blessed mirrors of his blessedness the highest being found no equal from The Chalice of the whole realm of souls their phoned forth for him infinitude [Music] thank you to all of these incredible patreon supporters these videos take a long time to research write and make I do a lot of reading they're always sourced and there's a bibliography in the description below I've written something short on why I think this kind of well-researched long-form content is worth supporting it's through the link below too if you agree then you can support then a night by pledging anything from a single dollar per month and get your name in credits access to scripts early and become a member of the Discord server if you can't do that I know everyone says this but please do subscribe hit the Bell like leave a comment these things help with the algorithm so so much I'm also trying out a newsletter I'm going to distill and Summarize each video into a quick easily digestible email for those who don't have time or want to recap along with some related insights sign up below as always more than anything thank you so much for watching I'll see you next time

Channel: Then & Now

Views: 692,267

Keywords: hegel, phenomenology of spirit, introduction, georg friedrich, intro, explained, dialectic, philosophy, guide

Id: w85nGQ_KUgE

Length: 124min 6sec (7446 seconds)

Published: Thu Aug 17 2023