Healer or Hoax? | Charlie Goldsmith put to the test | Sunday Night
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Sunday Night
Views: 832,267
Rating: 4.7771072 out of 5
Keywords: Sunday Night, News, Channel 7, Australia, Australian News, Current Affairs, Melissa Doyle, Charlie Goldsmith, The Healer, energy healer, energy healing, cure, arthritis, pain, heal, energy, mind, skeptics, doctors, Angela Cox, Sunday Night investigates Charlie Goldsmith, Charlie, Goldsmith, Sunday Night charlie goldsmith, channel 7 charlie goldsmith, healer or hoax, Charlie Goldsmith australia, australian healer, Charlie Goldsmith 2018, Charlie Goldsmith latest
Id: w1sOZFf4ak4
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 26min 13sec (1573 seconds)
Published: Sun Aug 05 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Interesting that the test is always pain relief and not - you know - growing back limbs or removing tumours.
See, that's your first problem. NEVER read the YouTube comments. Those are one of the worst cesspools of the internet.
wow those comments are literal aids "doctors are quacks" ....... are these bots commenting or is this fucking real? I know Australia has a sizeable anti-vax crowd, I wonder if this type of stuff is just an offshoot of that mistrust of the medical community.
Oh, another mysterious "energy" is it? Which one is it this time? Life energy , chi, spiritual energy, cosmic energy, or the Jedi Force?ο»Ώ
Holy shit!! This comment is nuts:
The problem with this kind of thing is that pain is subjective, and just to make it even more tricky, people are really shit at rating their own pain.
I'm a paramedic, and so I'm rating and treating peoples' pain on a regular basis. It's frustratingly hard to do and a balancing act between "I want to make this patient comfortable" and "I don't want to bomb this patient out of their mind on morphine".
We use a pain scale from 0 to 10, 0 being no pain and 10 the worst pain you could ever be in. There are several problems with that scale, the first being that it is subjective and so one person's 5/10 is the next person's 10/10. Therefore we have to gauge the effectiveness of our treatment against their responses and titrate accordingly. Has it got better? Can you tolerate it now? Is it still the same?
The next problem is that people are terrible at rating their pain out of 10. I often look for physiological signs, (HR, BP, RR, diaphoresis, etc), and body language in conjunction with the mechanism/illness and their story. I've been told the pt. is in 10/10 pain whilst they chat amiably with their friends, laughing and joking, making posts on Facebook, etc.
While I can't genuinely tell whether or not their pain is the worst they've ever experienced, (and it might well be if they've never had a serious injury or illness before), the physiological and behavioural signs tells me that I don't need to be cracking open morphine amps just yet.
Furthermore, after putting 5-10 mg of morph into a patient and reassessing their pain level I might get told it's reduced from an 8 to a 7/10, all whilst the patient is drowsing off on the stretcher.
None of this is a disparagement of the patients. It's just a really hard metric to use to judge pain by and it's very hard for the patients to properly articulate their level of discomfort. Sometimes they just don't understand the purpose of the questioning, sometimes they just have a low threshold, and sometimes they're over blowing it because they want someone to make a fuss over them.
People with chronic pain add an extra level of complexity because they're usually dealing with some level of constant pain on a day to day basis. Sometimes they're genuinely worse today and need a bit of help and sometimes they're not any worse but just sick of being in constant pain and are no longer coping.
So with that in mind, it's really hard to take this guy's claims seriously. Some of these people may genuinely have felt some relief, but I'd be curious as to how long the effects last. The whole "experiment" has absolutely no parameters, no controls, nothing that approaches a scientific study.
I'd rather see him do his thing whilst the patient was unaware of who he was or what he was doing. Have him in the room as part of a routine checkup. He doesn't need to touch or interact with the patient as he didn't touch any of them during this video. I suspect they won't see such a profound effect when the patient is not influenced.
Incidentally, Dr. Karen Coates who "saw it and therefore she must believe it" has some sketchy looking credentials. Apparently she is in fact a doctor, but is also a herbalist and has a team of naturopaths and acupunturists which honestly just undermines her credentials.
All up, very much a feel good puff piece that has absolutely no scientific credibility and at best is a good display of the placebo effect.
I have no doubt that placebo has an important effect in this mumbojumbo, but neurological conditions donβt disappear. I wonder if they hired actors, especially the 2 women in severe pain all day every day who magically got healed. Iβd love to have access to their medical records... And that doctor who agrees with it all is mindblowing... how about a post βinterventionβ X-ray in that last case, so we could see if there were any changes?! This gets me frustrated beyond measure.
It just means the content owner is moderating the comment section heavily maybe even paying for a few fake reviews as well.
The people that support these con artists are not in the reason business