Gov. Hobbs to be investigated for possible 'pay to play' scandal

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
FOSTER FOSTER KIDS. FOSTER KIDS. >> FOSTER KIDS. >> THE FOSTER KIDS. >> THE LOCAL FOSTER KIDS. >> THE LOCAL GROUP FOSTER KIDS. >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME FOSTER KIDS. >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME SUNSHINE >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME SUNSHINE >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME SUNSHINE RESIDENTIAL >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME SUNSHINE RESIDENTIAL HOMES >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME SUNSHINE RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME SUNSHINE RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS ALSO >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME SUNSHINE RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS ALSO A >> THE LOCAL GROUP HOME SUNSHINE RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS ALSO A PART RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS ALSO A PART RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS ALSO A PART OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS ALSO A PART OF THIS RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS ALSO A PART OF THIS INVESTIGATION. OF THIS INVESTIGATION. OF THIS INVESTIGATION. ACCORDING OF THIS INVESTIGATION. ACCORDING TO OF THIS INVESTIGATION. ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED OF THIS INVESTIGATION. ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, THE ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, THE ORGANIZATION ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, THE ORGANIZATION IS ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, THE ORGANIZATION IS A ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG ACCORDING TO PUBLISHED REPORTS, THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG DONOR THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG DONOR THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG DONOR TO THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG DONOR TO THE THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG DONOR TO THE GOVERNOR THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG DONOR TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG DONOR TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE THE ORGANIZATION IS A BIG DONOR TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE STATE TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE STATE TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE STATE DEMOCRATIC TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. DEMOCRATIC PARTY. DEMOCRATIC PARTY. OVER DEMOCRATIC PARTY. OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. OVER THE PAST DEMOCRATIC PARTY. OVER THE PAST COUPLE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY. OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, SUNSHINE OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, SUNSHINE GAVE OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, SUNSHINE GAVE AROUND OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, SUNSHINE GAVE AROUND $400,000 SUNSHINE GAVE AROUND $400,000 SUNSHINE GAVE AROUND $400,000 DONATIONS SUNSHINE GAVE AROUND $400,000 DONATIONS TO SUNSHINE GAVE AROUND $400,000 DONATIONS TO ENTRIES. DONATIONS TO ENTRIES. DONATIONS TO ENTRIES. ABOUT DONATIONS TO ENTRIES. ABOUT $100,000 DONATIONS TO ENTRIES. ABOUT $100,000 WENT DONATIONS TO ENTRIES. ABOUT $100,000 WENT DIRECTLY ABOUT $100,000 WENT DIRECTLY ABOUT $100,000 WENT DIRECTLY INTO ABOUT $100,000 WENT DIRECTLY INTO THE ABOUT $100,000 WENT DIRECTLY INTO THE GOVERNOR'S ABOUT $100,000 WENT DIRECTLY INTO THE GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL INTO THE GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL INTO THE GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL FUND INTO THE GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL FUND IN INTO THE GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL FUND IN DECEMBER INTO THE GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, INTO THE GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, A INTO THE GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, A MONTH FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, A MONTH FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, A MONTH BEFORE FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, A MONTH BEFORE HOBBS FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, A MONTH BEFORE HOBBS WAS FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, A MONTH BEFORE HOBBS WAS SWORN FUND IN DECEMBER 2022, A MONTH BEFORE HOBBS WAS SWORN INTO BEFORE HOBBS WAS SWORN INTO BEFORE HOBBS WAS SWORN INTO OFFICE. OFFICE. OFFICE. SHE'S OFFICE. SHE'S ACCUSED OFFICE. SHE'S ACCUSED OF OFFICE. SHE'S ACCUSED OF DIRECTING OFFICE. SHE'S ACCUSED OF DIRECTING THE SHE'S ACCUSED OF DIRECTING THE SHE'S ACCUSED OF DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT SHE'S ACCUSED OF DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF SHE'S ACCUSED OF DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SHE'S ACCUSED OF DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES SHE'S ACCUSED OF DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES TO DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES TO DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES TO APPROVE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES TO APPROVE A DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES TO APPROVE A 60% DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES TO APPROVE A 60% INCREASE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES TO APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES TO APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN THE APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN THE APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN THE RATE APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN THE RATE THAT APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN THE RATE THAT THEY APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN THE RATE THAT THEY CHARGE APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN THE RATE THAT THEY CHARGE FOR APPROVE A 60% INCREASE IN THE RATE THAT THEY CHARGE FOR CARE RATE THAT THEY CHARGE FOR CARE RATE THAT THEY CHARGE FOR CARE FOR RATE THAT THEY CHARGE FOR CARE FOR CHILDREN. FOR CHILDREN. FOR CHILDREN. THE FOR CHILDREN. THE REPORT FOR CHILDREN. THE REPORT SAYS FOR CHILDREN. THE REPORT SAYS THAT FOR CHILDREN. THE REPORT SAYS THAT OTHER THE REPORT SAYS THAT OTHER THE REPORT SAYS THAT OTHER PROVIDERS THE REPORT SAYS THAT OTHER PROVIDERS WERE THE REPORT SAYS THAT OTHER PROVIDERS WERE DENIED. PROVIDERS WERE DENIED. PROVIDERS WERE DENIED. THE PROVIDERS WERE DENIED. THE REPORT PROVIDERS WERE DENIED. THE REPORT PROMPTED PROVIDERS WERE DENIED. THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM PROVIDERS WERE DENIED. THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM TO PROVIDERS WERE DENIED. THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM TO ASK THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM TO ASK THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM TO ASK THE THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM TO ASK THE ATTORNEY THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM TO ASK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM TO ASK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE REPORT PROMPTED HIM TO ASK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE MARICOPA THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE MARICOPA COUNTY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY TO MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY TO MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INVESTIGATE. INVESTIGATE. INVESTIGATE. >> INVESTIGATE. >> WE INVESTIGATE. >> WE ARE INVESTIGATE. >> WE ARE NOT INVESTIGATE. >> WE ARE NOT A INVESTIGATE. >> WE ARE NOT A PROSECUTORIAL >> WE ARE NOT A PROSECUTORIAL >> WE ARE NOT A PROSECUTORIAL ENTITY, >> WE ARE NOT A PROSECUTORIAL ENTITY, THE >> WE ARE NOT A PROSECUTORIAL ENTITY, THE LEGISLATURE. ENTITY, THE LEGISLATURE. ENTITY, THE LEGISLATURE. WE ENTITY, THE LEGISLATURE. WE HAVE ENTITY, THE LEGISLATURE. WE HAVE A ENTITY, THE LEGISLATURE. WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR ENTITY, THE LEGISLATURE. WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN ENTITY, THE LEGISLATURE. WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN THE WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN THE WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN THE COUNTY WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN THE COUNTY AND WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN THE COUNTY AND A WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN THE COUNTY AND A PROSECUTOR WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN THE COUNTY AND A PROSECUTOR IN WE HAVE A PROSECUTOR IN THE COUNTY AND A PROSECUTOR IN THE COUNTY AND A PROSECUTOR IN THE COUNTY AND A PROSECUTOR IN THE STATE. COUNTY AND A PROSECUTOR IN THE STATE. THEY COUNTY AND A PROSECUTOR IN THE STATE. THEY HAVE COUNTY AND A PROSECUTOR IN THE STATE. THEY HAVE CRIMINAL STATE. THEY HAVE CRIMINAL STATE. THEY HAVE CRIMINAL DIVISIONS STATE. THEY HAVE CRIMINAL DIVISIONS AND STATE. THEY HAVE CRIMINAL DIVISIONS AND CIVIL STATE. THEY HAVE CRIMINAL DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. THEY DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. THEY ARE DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. THEY ARE GOING DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. THEY ARE GOING TO DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. THEY ARE GOING TO GO DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD DIVISIONS AND CIVIL DIVISIONS. THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE A THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE A LOOK THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE A LOOK AT THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE A LOOK AT THIS THEY ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND DETERMINE TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND DETERMINE WHETHER TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND DETERMINE WHETHER OR TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A "THERE" DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A "THERE" THERE. IS A "THERE" THERE. IS A "THERE" THERE. >> IS A "THERE" THERE. >> IN IS A "THERE" THERE. >> IN RESPONSE, IS A "THERE" THERE. >> IN RESPONSE, THEY IS A "THERE" THERE. >> IN RESPONSE, THEY SENT IS A "THERE" THERE. >> IN RESPONSE, THEY SENT A >> IN RESPONSE, THEY SENT A >> IN RESPONSE, THEY SENT A LETTER >> IN RESPONSE, THEY SENT A LETTER TO >> IN RESPONSE, THEY SENT A LETTER TO MITCHELL'S >> IN RESPONSE, THEY SENT A LETTER TO MITCHELL'S OFFICE LETTER TO MITCHELL'S OFFICE LETTER TO MITCHELL'S OFFICE ALERTING LETTER TO MITCHELL'S OFFICE ALERTING THEM LETTER TO MITCHELL'S OFFICE ALERTING THEM THAT LETTER TO MITCHELL'S OFFICE ALERTING THEM THAT THE LETTER TO MITCHELL'S OFFICE ALERTING THEM THAT THE AG' ALERTING THEM THAT THE AG' ALERTING THEM THAT THE AG' OFFICE ALERTING THEM THAT THE AG' OFFICE WILL ALERTING THEM THAT THE AG' OFFICE WILL INVESTIGATE ALERTING THEM THAT THE AG' OFFICE WILL INVESTIGATE THIS OFFICE WILL INVESTIGATE THIS OFFICE WILL INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE, OFFICE WILL INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE, NOT OFFICE WILL INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE, NOT THE OFFICE WILL INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE, NOT THE COUNTY OFFICE WILL INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE, NOT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY. ISSUE, NOT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY. ISSUE, NOT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY. GOVERNOR'S ISSUE, NOT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE ISSUE, NOT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED ISSUE, NOT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED THIS GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED THIS GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED THIS AS GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED THIS AS A GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED THIS AS A PARTISAN GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED THIS AS A PARTISAN ATTACK GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED THIS AS A PARTISAN ATTACK LED GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DESCRIBED THIS AS A PARTISAN ATTACK LED BY AS A PARTISAN ATTACK LED BY AS A PARTISAN ATTACK LED BY REPUBLICANS AS A PARTISAN ATTACK LED BY REPUBLICANS THAT AS A PARTISAN ATTACK LED BY REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS AS A PARTISAN ATTACK LED BY REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS IS AS A PARTISAN ATTACK LED BY REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS IS A REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS IS A REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS IS A FORMER REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS IS A FORMER SOCIAL REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS IS A FORMER SOCIAL WORKER REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS IS A FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO REPUBLICANS THAT HOBBS IS A FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO ONLY FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO ONLY FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO ONLY WANTS FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO ONLY WANTS TO FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO ONLY WANTS TO DO FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO ONLY WANTS TO DO WHAT'S FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO ONLY WANTS TO DO WHAT'S BEST FORMER SOCIAL WORKER WHO ONLY WANTS TO DO WHAT'S BEST FOR WANTS TO DO WHAT'S BEST FOR WANTS TO DO WHAT'S BEST FOR CHILDREN WANTS TO DO WHAT'S BEST FOR CHILDREN IN
Info
Channel: Arizona’s Family (3TV / CBS 5)
Views: 3,152
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: qvWPmFTUREs
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 1min 28sec (88 seconds)
Published: Sat Jun 08 2024
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.