Getting perfect exposure and colors everytime
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Tom Antos
Views: 370,211
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: filmmaking, film school, tutorials, Tom Antos, cinematography, color correction, color grading, video production, film production, adobe premiere pro, filmmaking tutorial, cinematographer, adobe premiere, premiere pro, film making, videography, adobe, b-roll, cc 2018, premiere pro cc 2018, grading, final cut pro x, exposure, color balance, X-Rite, color checker, gray card, white balance, middle gray, 18% gray, X-Rite Passport Color Checker, chart, zebra, waveform, vectorscope
Id: yNSRrIf8rY8
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 19min 8sec (1148 seconds)
Published: Thu Nov 23 2017
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I didn’t know Rick Grimes went from killing zombies to taking photos of them.
After the initial euphoria, disappointment will hit /r/filmmakers in two stages:
when it turns out that setting your exposure properly on a card will cause everything else in the frame to be completely off the charts unless you actually use lighting to bring it back into a usable range
when people discover that a technically perfect exposure is rarely what makes a "cinematic" image anyway.
Don't get me wrong, it's important to understand how this stuff works, but the card is not a magic wand. It's just a tool giving you feedback on your lighting decisions, but you have to make those decisions yourself in the first place, and they will require additional tools.
Edit: Say you place your subject against the background of a room that has daylight coming in through the windows, possibly a bunch of tungsten practicals on the wall too ... and then you blast your talent (and your color checker card) with the good ole $15 Professional "Daylight" Fluorescent Softbox™ from Amazon. You go ahead and adjust your camera until the color chart looks great, perfect white balance, perfect exposure. Guess what, your background suddenly looks like shit, because you just adjusted your camera to a shitty light.
Likewise, if you're using "reasonable" camera settings (like a good old 5600K no-tint WB), and then push and pull your colors in post in order to hit the marks on the vectorscope with the color checker, everything in your frame that's not purely illuminated by the ShittyBox™ will now look bad.
But let's say you do get all of that right, by not using the ShittyBox™ or the ChinaPanel™, but a proper light instead - you will find that all your subjects look like they're here to read the evening news, with those neutral, soft, front-lit 75 IRE skintones they're getting from the lighting you needed to get the color checker to look "right".
This is cool & all but I can never understand how wide to set the exposure to make sure the aperture doesn't get blown out, especially when you're filtering day for night in pre-production. And don't even get me started on chroma keying the audio in post.