Hello everyone This is CWK here. We are often asked by the audience How to choose the High-end Thin and Light Windows Laptops Because there are still quite a few professionals There is a need for this And I am also willing to spend more than 10,000 RMB (1500 USD) to buy a Laptop After all, it is used to work to make money The comfort of your own use is the most important Then we spent almost 50,000 RMB today Purchased the Dell XPS 13 Plus Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10 Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 LG gram 14 2022, four high-end thin and light books Everyone pays more attention to them Models with relatively high popularity Make a horizontal review for everyone to buy for a reference Because it is purchased at your own expense in line with the principle of saving as much as possible Although they are all high-end books, try to buy entry versions Because CPU, memory, SSDs these really don't make much difference And the manufacturer's upgrade price has too much brand tax 15,999 RMB of dell XPS 13 Plus i7 16G 512G version The seamless minimalist keyboard design looks so incredible At first glance you will be surprised that a laptop can also be designed in this way But there is no way for the China to start at a minimum of 16,000 RMB Forced i7+3.5K OLED screen If you want to go i5, you can only buy XPS 13 for old models And XPS 13 Plus can have an i5 1080p screen version in North America Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon i5 16G 512G version, 9999 RMB The black carbon fiber material looks decent Although I feel like I've saw this for a long time But after all, the famous brand of business laptop I don't want to make a very fancy look Or, in other words, a tribute to the classics Good to have i5 optional i7 is 2500 more expensive Grab the money properly Huawei MateBook X Pro Micro Velvet Collector's Edition of 11799 Dark blue i7 16G 512G It is a new force in notebooks And in the name of Huawei, even if the pricing is expensive Many users also recognize The regular version has the i5 version that is 1000 cheaper than the i7 However, the micro-velvet collector's edition of the shell material was changed It is 2000 yuan more expensive than the regular version And it's i7 to start To feel this dark blue velvet material Compared with the minimum allocation, you can only pay 3,000 yuan more Although the design looks Not as stunning as Dell But this micro-velvet material is really comfortable to touch Count it as a low-key luxury Feel like it's okay to spend the money 9299 yuan LG gram 14 inch white i5 16G 512G The appearance is the most ordinary The white shell looks like plastic But it is actually a magnesium alloy The main features are light weight and long endurance In fact, there are 256G versions that are 300 blocks cheaper The price difference between the two capacity Samsung PM9A1 hard drives is only about 150 But the 256G really isn't enough So let the manufacturer earn me 150 yuan more Each of the four notebooks has its own characteristics Although I wanted to say it at the beginning Intel 12th Generation Core really sucks It has seriously affected normal use But there is no way for high-end Windows to be thin and light, which is already a few options Pull out the general in the dwarf The appearance of the four thin and light books is quite different Except for XPS, they are all 14 inches in size The MateBook is the largest Is 14.2 inches XpS is noticeably smaller than the others It is 13.4 inches But don't look at XPS small The specifications of the screen are the highest among these machines Resolution 3456*2160 Refresh rate 60Hz OLED panel support touch The maximum measured brightness is 399nit The color gamut is ideal 100% sRGB coverage is achieved The average ΔE is not outstanding Is 1.62 However, look at the OLED version reported abroad these days There is actually a problem with the screen falling off Dell responded by loosening due to a problem with a third-party adhesive Dell USA is contacting the customer for replacement Quite speechless I don't know what the situation is with BNB Second only to XPS is the MateBook Resolution 3120*2080 Refresh rate 90Hz LTPS LCD panel Touch is also supported The measured maximum brightness is 552nit It is the tallest of the four machines 99.5% sRGB coverage was reached at the default settings 95.4% sRGB coverage was achieved in sRGB mode The average ΔE is 0.82 It was also nice X1C screen resolution 2240*1400 Refresh rate 60Hz IPS panel Touch is not supported Maximum brightness 336 Color gamut and ΔE are not ideal In particular, the average ΔE is only 2.99 The gamma value is offset a bit The lowest specification is gram The resolution is 1920*1200 Refresh rate 60Hz IPS panel Touch is not supported Maximum brightness 389nit Color gamut coverage performs well There is 99.8% sRGB But ΔE is at the bottom Up to 3.84 It's like it's not calibrated at all LG's control software has a professional mode that can be turned on However, after opening, measuring ΔE will report an error It is impossible to judge the difference between before and after The touch-enabled XPS and MateBook are both mirror screens After using it for a long time, it is inevitable that a bunch of fingerprints will be printed Frequent cleanup is required X1C and gram, which do not support touch, are both matte screens The layout of the C-sided keyboard XPS is the most distinctive The integrity is very high The area of each button is also large The F keypad is touch-sensitive After pressing the Fn key, the icon will become the corresponding function key The power-on button integrates fingerprint recognition But it is not labeled with any logo and blended into the main keyboard area If you don't pay special attention, you may not know it is the power button The power-on key has a slightly stronger press pressure than the keyboard There is no anti-false touch function in the system The touchpad also blends in with the lower half Don't assume, though, that the whole piece of glass is a touch area Actually only between the two ALT keys is the touchpad Haptic feedback is achieved by motor vibration The advantage is that the touchpad does not sink Tactile feedback is consistent across areas The force used by an ordinary touchpad to press on the top is completely different from the force used at the bottom The MateBook's keyboard design is a bit more popular in comparison The power-on button integrates fingerprint recognition Stand-alone placement Nothing special to highlight The touchpad area is the largest of the four machines It is also a vibrating haptic feedback Triggering feedback requires a slightly larger pressure pressure than XPS by default However, the compression sensitivity and shock intensity can be adjusted It is worth mentioning that the trackpad of the MateBook has a large number of gesture shortcuts Learning can be opened in the Huawei Control Center For example, knuckle tapping screenshots and the like Sliding adjustments in the edge area also simulate a rolling-like graininess The entire touchpad experience and function are much more comfortable than the other models The X1C's keyboard design is still an old Tradition of ThinkPad The little red dot and the physical buttons on the touchpad are still there The power-on key integrates fingerprint recognition and is placed independently The X1C's arrow keys are inside these four notebooks The only one with an approximate full-size design That's actually a good thing to do Anyone who has used it knows How hard is the up and down buttons that are half a key big The X1C's touchpad doesn't have much to say about The main theme is a tradition The area is also the smallest of the four Maybe he still hopes that users can use the little red dot more gram's keyboard is also very ordinary A keyboard membrane is included The upper right corner of the keyboard membrane also gives way to the power-on button Do you think that the boot key, like several other models, also integrates fingerprint recognition? Not really Gram is inside these four machines The only one that does not carry fingerprint recognition The touchpad is made of glass The configuration and design are very popular It is no different from a normal notebook The heat dissipation design of the D-side is divided into two factions XpS and MateBook are both side air intakes The X1C and gram are bottom air intakes The air outlets are all at the screen hinge The actual performance release and thermal dissipation effects will be tested later Interface configurations are also divided into two factions XPS and MateBook are mainly USB-C interfaces Among them, XPS does a relatively good job Only two C-ports were given One on the left and one on the left Although sent two adapters One to A port and one to 3.5mm audio This interface configuration looks how stingy Both C ports support Raiden 4 and charging functions Powerful though But the overall number is really too small Because charging is to use a C port It's more laborious to use without a docking station The MateBook is much more generous A total of 4 C-mouths were given Two on the left and the right There's even an extremely advanced 3.5mm audio interface The attachment gives a C-to-A adapter cable The two C-ports on the left support Thunderbolt 4 On the right is the fully functional USB-C All four interfaces support charging This is a relatively complete set of functions and quantities Although daily use may still be inseparable from the transfer But much better than XPS X1C on the left Supports both Raiden 4 USB-C 5Gbps USB-A and HDMI 2.0b On the right is the 3.5mm audio SIM card slot and 5Gbps USB-A That's right SIM card slot The X1C, which supports LTE models, has a built-in SIM card Real-name authentication is required 4G Internet access can be realized This card can only be used inside the X1C Plugging into another device will lock it We tried the SIM cards of the three major operators The moved card was found to be unrecognized Telecom and China Unicom can be used normally The high energy can run to a bandwidth of about 60Mbps Of course, this speed is related to the number and quality of base stations around you And the built-in SIM card was sent 15GB of unlimited speed traffic per month for a year This stuff is for some users who need to go out and surf the Internet all year round Still very useful To the left of gram is HDMI Two support thunderbolt 4 USB-C and 3.5mm audio On the right are the TF card slots with two 5Gbps USB-A And X1C only the difference between the card slot Interface between X1C and gram What is basically enough for daily office does not require additional transfers Personally, I still think it's uncomfortable for a laptop to drag a turnr The full C-mount design allows for a thinner body The full-size interface reduces retransmissions This depends on personal preference If you don't mind bringing a docking station or adapter cable The full C-port design will be more suitable for the positioning of thin and light But like the XPS 13 Plus, there are only two mouths Really too little Not even a 3.5mm audio interface I don't know which company started well Camera and microphone aspects Lenovo and Dell as established PC manufacturers Write the specifications more clearly XPS is a 920,000 pixel 720p 30-frame camera At the top of the screen are dual digital array microphones The X1C is a 1080p 30-frame fixed-focus camera With a physical peeping cover The four-microphone array supports Dolby Voice Like the XPS, it is also arranged on the top Huawei only wrote a 720p camera on the official website specification page Measured is a 720p 30-frame camera Can be quickly shut down in the Control Center software There are also 4 microphones At the cd surface connection Support Huawei's own AI noise reduction LG has no publicity at all on camera parameters Measured at 1080p 30 frames The microphones are 2 On the left and right sides of the camera gram's camera and microphone It can be turned off via the keyboard shortcut Fn+F4 Let's actually record these notebooks Camera and microphone In terms of privacy and security In addition to the X1C's physical paddles and gram shortcuts Both laptops come pre-installed with The Raise software It can intelligently detect the surrounding environment to prevent privacy leakage XPS has a similar feature But the number is a little less than That All four laptops have independent IR sensors Support Windows Hello face recognition The speaker configuration MateBook is the highest Up to six Both the X1C and XPS are two high, two low, and four speakers The gram only has two speakers However, this kind of specification parameter is not interesting Listen directly to everyone and you will understand You can leave a message about the bullet screen Which sound quality is the best Which sound quality is the worst Measured three-dimensional dimensions for each machine Weight and charging adapter weight All are placed here in the form of tables If there is too much data, it is not a one-size-fits-all idea gram though is the thickest But the weight is the lightest It has been done under 1Kg The other three contestants are all around 1.2Kg The difference in weight can be clearly felt on the hand This is mainly due to the magnesium alloy housing of gram After counting the weight of the adapter, it is still the lightest total weight of the gram Same as the MateBook's self-weight The other three players are in the 1.5Kg level If it is particularly sensitive to the weight of travel gram wins without a doubt The other three are not much different The design of the adapter is again a magic trick The simplest is the MateBook It's like a big phone charger The adapter is in-line It is then connected via a C to C line Total length 1 .8m Power 90W XPS adapters require both ends of the cable The city wire is 90cm long The C to C line is 1 .8m long Power 60W The X1C's adapters can only be separated on the mains side The city wire is 1m long The plugs of the three legs are very large The C-end is 1.8m long Power 65W The gram's adapter is roughly similar to the X1C The output is not separable But this city wire and the front one can be said to be very cheap Maybe it's similar to the table lamp you used 20 years ago Even the white color of the adapter and wire has a color difference Length 1m The C-end end is 1.5m long Power 65W By the way, the AC side of gram is also different from the white side of the D side Plus adapter one notebook 4 kinds of white Colorful white The design ideas of mobile phone manufacturers and traditional PC manufacturers are different This can be seen in the design of the charger From a minimalist and portable point of view Or a large phone charger a little more convenient The internal configuration of the four machines is shown in the table XPS 13 Plus and MateBook X Pro The minimum of the micro-velvet collector's edition is i7 The CPU used is the relatively high-end i7-1260P X1 Carbon and gram are available as low-end options In order to save money, we purchased the i5-1240P version Here I still want to spit on the XPS 13 Plus In many areas, there is an i5+1080P option Even the screen has 4 options 1080P is divided into non-touch and touch OLED 3.5K IPS 4K There are so many options compared to the US line BNC only has i7+3.5K OLED Only memory can be selected Hard disk capacity and color The memory is all 16GB LPDDR5 5200C60 The hard drives are all 512GB except for the MateBook PCIe 4.0 Top Solid State Samsung PM9A1 MateBook's hard drive from within the various software You can only see the name PCIe-8 SSD 512GB Many people speculate that it may be a posephobic PC005 Anyway, it's PCIe 3.0 disk Relative to the price of more than 10,000, it is a bit of a pull And Huawei upgraded from 512G solid state to 1TB solid state It costs an extra 1,000 bucks The difference in the actual difference between hard disks of similar specifications is only two or three hundred yuan It takes 1,000 yuan to upgrade the real hard disk from 512G to 1TB But the disk that also gave PCIe 3.0 was speechless Our shop is trendy and plays in the national digital The 1TB PM9A1 is only more than seven hundred 1TB of 3.0 PM981a is only about six hundred Really these notebook manufacturers do not learn from the good places of people's mobile phone factories Where consumer money is pitted, there is no teacher The OTHER three notebooks have slightly different PM9A1s Gram uses the 9A1 of the public version 00B00 Version 2.8A On the models that we sell every day in our store XPS and X1C use customized versions of their own brands Dell is 2.1A Lenovo is a full-blood version of the 2.9A and the retail version of the 980 PRO The CDM running scores all look pretty much the same XPS has many other models of SSD firmware on the driver page of Dell's official website It is speculated that the SSD will be mixed Although the manufacturer chooses i5 i7 is 1000-2000 pieces But in fact, 1240P and 1260P are two P28 series CPUs Very similar in terms of specifications There are only three slow size differences Even the specifications of the H45's 12500H are almost the same I have to suspect that the H45 series and the P28 series are the same thing Performance depends largely on power consumption limitations Everyday office use is even harder to differentiate Later we will also compare the CPU performance of these four notebooks So I think normal users can buy i5 on the line Spending an extra one or two thousand to upgrade the i7 really doesn't make a difference Of course, it doesn't matter if the user is not bad for money After reading the specifications We conduct actual tests Because each notebook has a different performance model Many like XPS and gram have four gears Fewer like the X1C only have simple fan speed switching It is said that it can only be modified through the power policy in the Windows system But the average person who would move that thing We tested all the performance patterns The test load was AIDA64 single baked CPU Duration 20 minutes There will be more charts in the future To avoid the video being too boring I don't read every piece of data one by one Interested parties can pause the viewing by themselves XPS starts in performance mode with half a minute of real man time And five minutes of times men's time The long-term power consumption wall falls to 28W The default mode bounces up and down at 20W The fast cooling and quiet mode is only in the early 10W The P-core frequency and the E-core frequency basically follow the regular distribution of the power consumption wall However, the frequency of E cores in fast cooling and quiet mode is significantly reduced The temperature is also not high The quick-cooling mode is only 56 degrees The MateBook's high-energy mode long-term power wall is also 30W But real men have obviously shorter time The power wall in balanced mode is 25W The gap is not very large The frequency and temperature performance that results in the two modes is also not much different The X1C has no performance gearing options The switch of the automatic fan can only be selected by pressing Fn+T The long-term power consumption wall at automatic speed is only 17W Very low It can also be compared with the quiet mode of XPS The temperature actually doesn't look very high Early 70 degrees The P-core is only about 2GHz The performance release is very conservative The power curve of gram looks more abstract In high-performance mode, it can maintain a long-term power wall of about 25W Low performance is 12W Normal mode jumps back and forth between the two The noise-free mode fluctuates between 6-8W Frequency and temperature also show the same trend with the power consumption wall What's more interesting is in the noise-free mode The frequency of E-nuclei is even higher than that of P-nuclei It seems that the main limitation is the performance release of the P core Very reasonable Cinebench runs in their respective maximum performance modes It can also be seen in the respective CPU performance release capabilities XPS and MateBook though are both about 30W power walls XPS is even slightly lower But XPS runs more frequently The P-core reaches 3.1GHz 0.1 higher than the MateBook The result is also xps leading the way gram came in third gram 14 i5 1240P 10 minute running score It is also about 10% lower than the MateBook's i7 1260P The X1C score is more ugly Especially the results of the 10-minute long test The R23 score is even more than half that of the XPS Obviously caused by an overly conservative performance release The Adobe Puget three-piece set took a long time to test The power consumption of several notebooks is constantly changing As a result, the grades are not stable This side is for reference only By and large, it is still the strongest XPS X1C is the weakest Each notebook is in its own highest performance mode The surface temperature of the keyboard during the stress test is shown in the figure XPS keyboard due to assume a part of the air intake function The overall temperature is the lowest The MateBook and gram's keyboard heating area is significantly larger The three machines have the highest temperature keycaps all around 46 degrees The gap is not large The temperature of X1C is outrageous The left side can reach 52 degrees On the right is higher than room temperature Ice and fire Especially the surface temperature near the charging port Your left hand will definitely touch it The fan noise is very small The loudest voice is only 41 decibels Disassemble the machine to see the actual heat dissipation specifications Here we say that the dismantling of Huawei's MateBook is the most troublesome There are two screws under the foot pads and there is also a warranty sticker This machine we will not disassemble the dismantling diagram of the pen bar evaluation room Heat dissipation specifications X1C and gram are minimal It is a single set of fins for a single heat pipe The X1C used two small turbofans Gram used a large turbofan The D side of the gram looks like it has such a long opening But the inside is basically sealed with tape Only a small half of the intake is left This parting hole also does not face the turbofan It's at the CPU It may be that you want to enter the air through the opening of the right screen axis and the D side Bring a little airflow to the hard disk and memory It is worth mentioning that gram is among these four notebooks The only model that can extend an additional M.2 hard drive In order to control the weight, several holes were dug in this PCB But there are still two M.2s that are really commendable The other models can only replace the hard drive XpS uses a single heat pipe plus a double fin set The MateBook is the most luxurious Use a heat-depleting plate design Two sets of fins and fans At the same power consumption of about 30W The CPU temperature is 8 degrees lower than the XPS XPS is the most aggressive performance release But the price is the high temperature of the CPU The overall keyboard temperature is not high It's not as bad as some people have said before Because they haven't seen the worse X1C Next, the consumer group of light and thin books is most concerned about - battery life It is well known due to scheduling issues The battery life of Windows notebooks has not been ideal Intel's is even worse The official page of X1C says it all The 12th generation P28 processor has worse battery life than the 11th generation On the contrary, AMD's current battery life is better But high-end notebooks are basically Intel's Possible changes in the processor ecology It's a little harder than a change in processor performance Let's also take a look at whether there are any players in these models that are relatively durable All endurance tests turn off auto-adjust brightness display optimization adjustments and low battery automatically enters power saving mode Performance modes are default blocks The screen brightness remains 160nit Before the test, review the nominal battery capacity of each contestant The maximum gram is 72Wh The MateBook is 60Wh The X1C is 57Wh XpS is 55Wh Let's start with the PCMark 8's endurance test Both the XPS MateBook and the X1C are between 3 and 3.5 hours Only gram reached 5 1/2 hours The test score was only 3570 points lower than XPS The other three can reach more than 4000 It's interesting In the case of plug-in XPS's performance unleashes the most aggressive When not plugged in, the performance is released to become the most conservative PcMark 8's battery life is, after all, a theoretical test In order to better simulate the battery life actually used by the user We also asked Piao Ge for their GLBC endurance test script The test included a total of Excel PPT Word web browsing Video playback and QQ group chat six-stage project During the period, NetEase Cloud runs in the background to play music But turn off the speakers Each project takes 10 minutes One round of testing for 1 hour Repeat again and again This test simulates the user's actual office usage environment Closer to reality The gram lead in this test is even more pronounced Reached more than 6 hours Nearly twice as much as the X1C and MateBook Of course, you can't just look at the results Also analyze the data behind it We count each notebook when running tests Cpu power curves can be found The X1C is the worst performance release though in plug-in situations But not plugged in when testing The average CPU power consumption turned out to be the highest It is no wonder that the battery life performance is not ideal And gram not only has low CPU power consumption The display specifications are also the lowest of the four It also has a battery with maximum capacity There is no doubt that you can become a battery life winner The CPU power consumption of XPS and MateBook is not particularly high But consider that they have a high-resolution touch screen This is also a big power consumer The results were not ideal either In fact, this power consumption graph can be Then put the Lenovo Savior Y7000P i5 12500H test power curve Put it in for comparison You will find that the power consumption of the game when doing the GLBC endurance test is high But not much higher And thanks to the large capacity battery of 80Wh The overall endurance performance is actually not lagging behind these thin and light costs The R7000P for the AMD platform is turned off with the monoscopic display turned off It can even reach a score of nearly 5 hours Much stronger than the three thin and light books except for gram From a battery life point of view Except for the level of gram that barely counts as usable The other notebooks can only be described as very bad Of course, the main reason is Intel's poor energy consumption control Let's take the X1 Carbon, which consumes the most power in the actual one-hour test The total CPU power consumption is 10.3W That's half as high as gram's 6.69W It's surprising The average CPU power consumption during the process of browsing the web is actually the highest Reached 14.51W The power curve is very steep Constantly fluctuating up and down It could be the moment a web page opens The CPU slammed the turbo Instead, watch the 4K video of the B station in the latter paragraph And the power consumption of opening the bullet screen is 11.51W The power consumption of the last QQ chat is 9.93W Slightly taller than Office Let's be honest Word typing Open the web page QQ chat A lot of people don't think it's a heavy load But in fact on some notebooks The result of this actual endurance test Even worse than PCMark 8.9 The current use of more PCMark 10 endurance test intensity is even lower It tends to be twice as long as PCMark 8 At every turn, it is a battery life of more than ten hours Many review media always talk about pcmark 10's battery life It will be very misleading to the audience What is even more excessive is that some manufacturers will even advertise an endurance of about 20 hours For example, the official propaganda of ThinkPad X1 Carbon is a 14.3-hour simulated office 19 hours of 1080p local video playback That's the 3-hour score of our actual office test It's four or five times worse than this 14.3 hours I really can't understand how this 14.3 hours is measured Lenovo can see this 14.3-hour test description The test model is our low-end version of the i5 1240P But BNP does not have a WUXGA resolution That is, the screen of 1920 *1200 It's also interesting to add a paragraph Say because the number of Core cores increased in the 12th generation Therefore, the battery life will be smaller than that of similar 11 generation products Looks pretty honest It just feels a little too faceless to Intel Huawei and Dell did not advertise battery life The LG gram 14 website advertises a standby time of 23.5 hours JD.com has become local video playback and continuous web browsing To be honest, although the gram 14's endurance is significantly stronger than the other three But 23.5 hours and our test is also too bad We don't know exactly what pages we're browsing These thin and light costs poor battery life The root cause is that Intel's energy efficiency ratio is too poorly controlled On the desktop side, you can increase the power consumption by increasing the specifications to get better performance But applying this idea on mobile is very problematic The notebook is not a desktop with a battery Attention must be paid to energy efficiency ratios You can't blindly pile the core Rather, it is necessary to make effective use of the core I just typed a word to look at a web page on a dozen watts of CPU power consumption down Intel wants to promote how the running score leads the competition In exchange for 3 hours of battery life Personally, I think it's ridiculous behavior Stop indulging in PPT and advertising in the 12th generation Core hanging M2 Why should Apple abandon Intel to make its own chips Intel, don't you reflect on yourself? Four notebooks Only non-traditional pen power planters Huawei On a Windows system basis It is accompanied by the so-called "Super Turbo" optimization Officially, it is an intelligent identification user scenario For resource management But how to optimize it specifically Huawei officials did not specify We can only look for a bunch of media when reading ads Most of them demonstrate a web page that opens a live stream Start the meeting software again This is when the Task Manager opens You can see that the web page's use of the GPU is suddenly close to 0 At first glance, I think it is very powerful But in reality this is a feature that Windows minimizes You manually minimize the web page of the live stream At this point, Windows no longer calls the graphics card to decode the video Just decode the audio Some resource management was indeed carried out Mainly rely on the functions of Windows It's a bit too much time to find the media to blow But when we were actually testing the battery life The more windows open, the more they will automatically help you minimize Under "Super Turbo" optimization As a result, the software card BUG cannot be closed sequentially So we had to squat there Close the window manually We also specially withdraw from Huawei Butler software Turn off the "Super Turbo" feature Run the actual endurance test again The findings have no noticeable effect on battery life And what's more interesting is that Honor, which broke away from Huawei, launched its new MagicBook 14 notebook this year The official promotion of "OS Turbo" optimization has the function of improving battery life That feature does look like it has reduced power consumption and increased battery life It's a pity on these four high-end thin and light books You don't see similar features yet I hope to learn from glory But the key to poor battery life is Intel's hardware design The software side can only be a small repair After watching the battery life By the way, let's also look at charging The charging speed is the fastest in the MateBook with a 90W charger Elapsed 1 hour and 32 minutes The remaining three are all 60-65W chargers X1C comes second Elapsed 1 hour and 46 minutes XPS Third (Slip of The Tongue) Duration 1 hour and 54 minutes The largest battery capacity also takes the longest Up to 2 hours and 15 minutes Each home is a three-stage charge The maximum charging power is also basically close to the charger specifications From the charging capacity curve, you can see that it is a little more than the respective nominal capacity With the exception of X1C, they are about 10Wh taller Is it that the X1C's charging chip conversion rate is very high Only consumed 3Wh? Go to AIDA64 to see the battery capacity The X1C is designed to be 57Wh Maximum 53.8Wh There is not much difference in the nominal design and maximum capacity of the XPS and MateBook The gram maximum capacity is also a little less So obviously not X1C high conversion rate Instead, the maximum usable capacity is lower than the nominal In fact, the X1C is very hot near the interface when charging If you use it a little more at this time No need for a grill Just open the document and watch the video The surface temperature will reach 50 degrees Celsius and is very hot The ThinkPad X1 Carbon is really speechless The surface temperature is highest The CPU performance release is the worst when plugged in The power consumption is the highest when the unplugged endurance test is given Looked at so much hardware Let's look at the software side Except for LG gram The other three are Windows 11 Home Chinese Edition and permanent Office 2021 Home and Student Edition LG is somewhat unique It is installed with The Windows 11 Home Edition and a 1-year office 365 personal subscription Subscription-based 365 compared to the perpetual version One more 1TB of OneDrive space But LG's promotional page reads genuine Office Only the Microsoft 365 Personal Edition is marked It didn't mention that there was only a 1-year subscription I don't know when I get the notebook It's a bit of a pit to pay extra after 1 year Although most individual users to the system Neither Office will cost money In fact, if you really have to spend money to buy an Office 365 subscription The home version is a bit more cost-effective Less than 300 a year It can be used by 6 users and 5 devices at the same time This fee is actually for individuals or small companies It is completely affordable Both the X1C and MateBook have their own computer butlers Integrated antivirus clean garbage drive updates and other functions However, there is no option to update the BIOS in X1C's Computer Manager But as far as we know Lenovo Computer Butler It should be only installed by the National Bank The non-NAC's name is Lenovo Vantage X1C National Bank Edition in addition to the computer butler There is also Lenovo Baiying software Similar to the working console Of course there's a bunch of them inside Sell Lenovo's own so-called original factory services Sells for more than Jingdong 999 yuan Samsung 980 PRO Also expensive PM9A1 1TB OEM model with 3-year warranty More expensive than the retail version of the 5-year guarantee Of course as a veteran business book There's also the Raise software You can realize the automatic lock screen when people walk Detect the person behind you near the blurred screen, etc A bunch of security features Some users may use it As for this lock computer for cleaning function It's kind of funny XPS's computer butler is called My Dell The antivirus feature is addressed by the pre-installed McAfee Although I uninstalled it when I got it The clean up junk and drive BIOS update features are addressed by the Support Assistant The software's versatility is linked through shortcuts Not integrated into one whole The MateBook is similar to the Honor notebook After all, they used to be a family The control center integrates many functions commonly used by Chinese people in office Some interactions between Huawei mobile phones and computers are emphasized There is also a function on the computer similar to the negative screen of the mobile phone The built-in app store can install Android apps directly Equivalent to the default pre-installed Android emulator It's quite convenient gram's pre-installed software is curious He pre-installed a full set of CyberLink family barrels That's the power DVD company Just send a low-end version of Adobe Family Bucket Although the software is old pop-ups let you go buy the latest version of them Antivirus is still McAfee Computer Manager LG Smart Assistant offers quite a lot of functionality The performance mode is also tuned here gram also did a driver update feature But the download speed of the update is very slow A bit torturous Gram also has the same as the X1C Raise software that protects privacy and promotes healthy use of computers So much more Very long time It is equivalent to doing four review videos + comparison Thank you very much for watching Let's sum up Intel China Marketing A lot of energy was spent promoting the so-called Evo certification of the thin and light book Known as "super energy thin and light book to identify the Intel Evo standard" But I personally think Evo is just An Intel marketing strategy There is not much practical reference use A thin and light book is good or bad It has little to do with whether or not it is Evo certified Third edition of Intel Evo certification for battery life requirements You don't need to bring power for a day out and about Charge for half an hour And use for 4 hours FHD resolution screen Wi-Fi and high screen brightness In real-world use scenarios Lasts at least 9 hours I personally think this is serious false propaganda Unless you call the computer standby a real usage scenario Very poor power control due to Intel 12th Generation Core The battery life of these high-end Windows notebooks Except for gram 14, it is a barely usable level XPS 13 Plus ThinkPad X1 Carbon MateBook X Pro About three hours of actual battery life It's a disaster You can imagine This is in 2022 Does it happen to the high-end light and thin things that are more than 10,000 yuan? Not only is the battery life lagging behind AMD products Even worse than its own 11th generation Core old products But high-end Windows notebooks are almost entirely monopolized by Intel So a lot of users may want to consider first Your own work is not often to use a notebook unplugged It is not necessary to use a Windows system Otherwise this endurance problem really affects the use of too much Even I personally feel that it is useful for some users And can not use the difference anymore After the total evaluation, look at each machine Dell XPS 13 Plus The plus is that the appearance is very stunning High value It looks very small You think that such a small size and thickness should dissipate heat very poorly But in fact, the XPS 13 Plus's 28W performance release is the most aggressive Although the CPU temperature is not low, the surface temperature is well controlled After-sales accident insurance + door-to-door after-sales support global joint insurance We've also tested alien accident insurance before Splash a glass of water on your door and re-assemble one for you In fact, it is not an alien after-sales good But the dell smart service of the parent company Dell is better The disadvantages are also very obvious One is that the price is very expensive Moreover, BNP clearly distinguishes between discriminating against Chinese mainland users In cases where the US BANK CPU screen has multiple options Bank of China forced the i7 3.5K OLED touch screen to start The minimum price is 16,000 Second, the interface design is too extreme Only 2 Type-C interfaces remain One is also used for charging The third is that although the smallest volume and thickness of the four units are the thinnest But the weight is the same as the MateBook X Pro, which is a full circle bigger It's no different from the X1C It just looks small but not light Shell WHEN CNC I personally think that there are many places where you can cut a little more and reduce weight A bit of a fierce glance at the world's great beauty, sinking fish and falling geese Closed moon shy flowers After using it for a long time, it feels like a vase Of course, many people are willing to pay for the vase Appearance is the most important Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon One advantage is that there is a relatively cheaper i5 version to choose from Second, the interface is very complete C-port A-port HDMI 3.5 audio is available Very convenient for work use, almost no need to bring adapter wires The third is to have a Sim card slot and send 12 months of monthly 15G traffic Very convenient for mobile work Fourth, after-sales has finally been upgraded from the previous one-year warranty to a two-year warranty Although there is no accident insurance But the after-sales outlets are very complete On-site after-sales + second day hardware fault repair service Business users basically do not need to worry about the warranty period Computer failure causes usage to be affected But the ThinkPad X1C speaks nicely and pays homage to the classics To speak badly is to eat the old book and not to update it seriously So the disadvantages are also very numerous One As a million dollar notebook Although it is the lowest match But the screen is also too bad The color gamut color accuracy is relatively poor It really just can only meet the needs of the office Second Very bad or even seriously affect the use of heat control The temperature at the left charging port is very high It can even affect the keyboard area The high temperature area of the CPU heat pipe is also on the left Avoid burns when you really use it Third At extremely high surface temperatures However, it is a very poor performance release performance Only 17W Obviously seriously affects the performance of the CPU Fourth It's extremely poor power control There is no decent mode switching software Unplugged in actual use testing The X1C's power control is the worst Plainly The X1 Carbon stands up to ThinkPad's old name Eat a lot of industry orders for purchases I learned a lot about the focus of product development It is also aimed at the underlying hardware security and batch management functions for industry customers There are even custom models That's for individual users who barely use these features This part of the premium I think becomes an "IQ tax" It feels like a ThinkPad coat A few thousand pieces of machine can be sold to tens of thousands There are also a bunch of businesses that will come to bulk purchases Or industry orders to make money Huawei MateBook X Pro As a non-traditional notebook manufacturer You can still see a lot of intentions in the design Or you can see a lot of places to learn from Apple Advantages first 3 to 2 3.1K 90Hz touch screen The screen quality is outstanding And unlike the Dell BANK XPS 13 Plus Force the top screen with sixteen thousand to start Lenovo's lowest-rated screen sucks Change a little bit of screen is amazingly expensive Huawei's minimum version of less than 9,000 is also the same screen as the top It may be that mobile phone manufacturers have higher requirements for screens second Excellent in terms of unique features Regardless of this piece I currently use the best Windows touchpad Lots of practical gestures Or a lot of the linkage on the function of the mobile phone Although there may be many features I can't use But many traditional laptop manufacturers almost do not develop the function Many mobile phone manufacturers will do laptops This is certainly good for consumers Let me give you an example The BIOS of the mobile phone factory basically has Chinese The traditional pen power plant home is hehe The sound quality of the other three notebooks Basically, it is a pure pendulum to listen The MateBook X Pro is at least slightly listenable There are drawbacks too One Solid state only the unrecognizable model pcIe 3.0 And there is only one M.2 interface Hard drive upgrades are expensive 10,000 yuan in 2022 PCIe 4.0 solid state is not yet used It was really very surprising And this is still on the basis of the difference of 1,000 yuan for the 512G upgrade to 1TB Just finished exaggerating the advantages of the mobile phone factory on the screen Some bad traditions of mobile phone factories on hard disks are used on PCs Second The 4 C-ports though are not like the XPS 13 Plus Only give 2 C-ports so extreme But for Windows notebooks, it is inevitable that there is some trouble in transferring Third The power consumption wall is slightly conservative Heat dissipation specifications are the most luxurious of the four But the long performance release is somewhat conservative Even the run-off xpers 13 Plus are a little behind Fourth Notebook disassembly is complicated There are screws under the foot pads and there is a warranty sticker If you want to replace the hard disk, you must pay to find a Huawei repair point It should be noted that although Huawei has many repair points But many are so-called authorized repair points And many laptops cannot be repaired hardware Compared with Lenovo Dell's notebook after-sales is worse Say a word of expectation Huawei's software side does so many features Personally, I think it is the icing on the cake If you can do it in terms of battery life Make obvious optimizations It is to really enhance the competitiveness of this machine Although this is mostly an Intel problem Even a patriotic enterprise like Huawei It is impossible not to use American chips The operation is as fierce as a tiger One look at the battery life for three hours Very helpless LG gram 14 One advantage Very light The weight of the body of less than 1kg is significantly lower than that of the other three products Even the weight of the adapter is similar to the weight of other body weights Thin and light I personally think that thin is the appearance Light is the essence Volume made small I personally feel Not as light as weight Second Supports hard drive expansion It's hard to imagine that the lightest notebook also has 1 M.2 hard disk slot reserved None of the other three Although thin and light is not mandatory, it must have 2 M.2 hard disk bits But there is better than nothing Third The battery life is significantly better than that of competitors Although the 12th generation of Core Windows this everyone generally has a bad battery life But gram 14 is at least the level of workability Go out for half a day to use You still don't need to worry about the battery The other three are similar to the endurance anxiety of electric vehicles It didn't take long to consider where to charge It was so uncomfortable Fourth Fully equipped interface USB Type-A, Type-C, 3.5mm jack HDMI is available There's even a TF card slot Enough for the day-to-day office with almost no additional transfers However, the disadvantages of gram are also very obvious The first is that there are very few channels to buy When we bought it, only JD.com sold it itself Neither the Tmall flagship store has a 12th-generation gram 14 And it's not officially opened by LG Now I see that there is a sale However, there is also what to do to disassemble the machine and change the hard disk operation LG Notebook as a whole has few sales channels Second Poor after-sales service LG is an international manufacturer However, it is mainly based on home appliances Computers are also dominated by monitors The LG notebook was even printed on the D-side It is the specific address of the Nanjing factory But nanjing actually does not have a notebook repair point Not even Jiangsu Notebooks can only be sent to Beijing for after-sales And the after-sales time is The whole machine 1 year main components 2 years The mainstream is the whole machine 2 years warranty Third The appearance workmanship is worse than the price of the 10,000 yuan level The shell of the magnesium alloy is light though It feels good too But it looks like plastic And the wire given by the adapter is unusually cheap The host plus adapter is a total of four whites The appearance gives a bad first impression But after a while I felt that it was okay inside Finally, thank you for watching such a long video Under the Windows camp Battery life problems with Intel 12th generation Core machines Really too much influence to use In addition to this general big problem Every machine has obvious advantages and disadvantages It's hard to say who's more worth buying Can only say whose merits are exactly what you need At the same time you can live with its drawbacks That's for you That's it for today's video After watching this video, Which Windows high-end thin and light laptop will you choose? Leave a comment below Don't forget to subscribe and hit the like bottom Because we are full-time YouTubers Your likes are very important to us If you want to know more information about computers You can subscribe to our WeChat Media Platform "潮玩客CWK" If you want to buy a computer You can come to our Taobao store "ChaoWanGuoDuShuMa" Or search for the product "ChaoWanKe" in taobao.com This is CWK We'll see you next time. Bye!
