Film Theory: Luke SHOULDN'T Destroy The Death Star (Star Wars)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The Film Theorists
Views: 7,839,710
Rating: 4.865387 out of 5
Keywords: star wars, star wars: the force awakens, star wars: a new hope, star wars: return of the jedi, star wars episode VII, star wars episode 7, jedi, luke skywalker, death star, darth vader, star wars empire, emperor palpatine, film theory, film theorists, the film theorists, matpat, matthew patrick, matthewpatrick13, star wars movie
Id: s4Y3dlTDAxw
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 14min 7sec (847 seconds)
Published: Sun Jan 17 2016
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I'm not so sure there's any proof or reason to think a pan galactic fascist super government whose member planets seem to consist of majority of backwater worlds operating on a barter systems would operate under the same national debt and loan default rules that modern economies do.
The Emperor is like space wizard Hitler, and any historian can tell you Hitler was a really shitty economist (no he did not save Germany's economy why does everyone keep circulating that myth. The man was at his least evil still incredibly incompetent fiscally and militarily)
Thing about the Galactic Empire... It encompassed an entire galaxy. You know, a collection of hundreds of billions of stars and trillions upon trillions of worlds.
What MatPat failed to realize in that episode, is that space is big. Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space.
The Galactic Empire was so vast that it's corporate sector ALONE occupied 30,000 star systems. It had 25,034 years of infrastructure in existence to support it. Taxes on that sector alone were "The Empire would collect a yearly stipend of 3% of the total gross product, 9% of all material, and 20% of all strategic rare elements from the Corperate Sector." This is in addition to all other taxes, and excludes taxes collected on worker's wages and droid owners.
Yes, the Death Star consumed multiple planets worth of resources. Yes it costs an unfathomable amount of cash to make (at least in the minds of we who can't even unify our planet into one government primitive culture's way of thinking.) My point is, the Galactic Empire's economy can treat the loss of the Death Star with the same 'meh' you would treat realizing that someone shaved a few millimeters of copper off the edge of one penny in your bank account.
Oh no. The economies of a few dozen worlds crashed. How tragic. This is the same as a few random amazonian tribal villages dying off to us. It's irrelevant, makes no impact, and we don't care. We literally have millions of worlds that are still working fine.
Palpatine caused a ruinous pan-Galactic war in order to get to power, he's not particularly better than the Rebel Alliance in that sense. Also, he's worrying about the economy alone, and not the fact that the villains in the story can destroy planets as a show of force. It seems a little shortsighted. I know that there can be lots of serious negative repercussions of economic failure, but I'd question whether they outweigh the downsides of imperial rule.
yeah, because what Star Wars needs is more complicated plots about economy and trade.
"We can't liberate Europe, imagine the economic impact of removing the Fascists from power!"