Factor Analysis in SPSS (Principal Components Analysis) - Part 3 of 6

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
we'll also pull up our Scree plot here. These two tables here, the Total Variance Explained and Scree Plot, both deal with what's known as our factor extraction methods. If you recall when we went through SPSS, the options, we left the eigenvalue greater than one rule option selected as the default, but we also selected that a Scree plot be output in our analysis. And these are two of the most commonly used procedures for deciding how many components or factors to retain; how many do you want to keep in our solution. So we'll go ahead and take a look at these in turn here. Here for our Total Variance Explained table, notice first of all that we have 5 components in our rows here. And you may be wondering, well wait a second, I thought factor analysis, the whole purpose of it, was to reduce our number of variables into a smaller number of components? And if you are thinking that, you're correct, that is our purpose here. But, as just a matter of definition, it's always the case that the number of variables we input in our analysis, will always be equal to the number of components shown here. So we have five variables input in our analysis, therefore we have 5 rows or 5 components shown here. Now here in our Initial Eigenvalues table, notice that we have these various eigenvalues. So the first one is 3.136 and everything after that is less than 1. Now if you recall our first rule was eigenvalue greater than one rule. So that was, keep the number of factors or components that have eigenvalues greater than one. All other components with eigenvalues less than one, such as these here, we do not keep. If you look at the Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings section of this table, notice that there's only one value here now. And what this means is this is how many components SPSS retained or kept, based on the rule. So since only one component had an eigenvalue greater than one, we only have one component in our solution here. So the results of this rule tells us, or indicates, that we want to have one component. So in other words, we reduce those 5 variables down to one component. Or that one component, from this perspective, does a pretty good job at explaining the relationships between SWLS1 through SWLS5. And, as a side note, there are different ways of assessing how good of a job this component did at explaining those relationships, but for now, using this rule, we know that we have one component, that's all we're going to keep. One way to assess how good of a job this analysis did at explaining the relationships between those variables, is to look at the percent of variance accounted for by the component. And in this example, our one component solution accounted for 62.72% of the variance, or about 63% of variance, which is pretty good in practice. I typically see solutions between 40% and 60% of the variance, in the 40s through 60s, in that range. I don't typically see many solutions with variance higher than 70, and a solution below 40 is not very strong. But that's typically the range that I'll see them in, so I would say that 63% is pretty good in practice. Now an interesting thing here, recall that we had 5 components. If you add up these eigenvalues they will equal to 5, within rounding error. So the sum of the eigenvalues is always equal to the number of components, or put another way, the number of original variables in your analysis. So if I had 10 variables in my analysis here, then these values would sum up to 10. And in fact would be 10 rows in this table. Now since I have 5 variables, I'm going to have 5 components output in my initial solution, and the eigenvalues will sum to 5. And the reason why that's good to know is that if you divide the eigenvalue for our retained component the 3.136/5 you will get exactly .6272 or 62.72% when converted to a percentage. So the percent of variance accounted for is literally the magnitude of the eigen- value divided by the sum of the eigenvalues, or 5 in this case. OK, so in summary, our eigenvalue greater than one rule indicated that one component should be retained. Next let's look at the Scree plot. So here our Scree plot, notice first of all that on the X-axis, the component number is plotted, so this is the first component, second component, third, and so on. And on the Y-axis we have our eigenvalue plotted. And in fact if you think about it, this graph is really just plotting, notice this first value, 3.136, that is right here. Component 2 is somewhere between .6 and .7, and if you look here, here we go component 2, .625. Notice component 3 drops off just a little, it is .534 Component 4 is .463, and then component 5 is .231. So this Scree plot is literally just these eigenvalues plotted from left to right. Now the rule of thumb for interpreting the Scree plot is as follows:
Info
Channel: Quantitative Specialists
Views: 71,444
Rating: 4.9335179 out of 5
Keywords: Factor Analysis, PCA, factor analysis, common factor analysis, principal components analysis, scree plot, eigenvalue greater than 1, factor loading, component loading, factor loading matrix, orthogonal rotation, oblique rotation, variance accounted for, communality, quantitative specialists, statistics instructor, multivariate statistics, SPSS (Software), Mathematics (Field Of Study)
Id: fZ_R4Zs1AZo
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 5min 44sec (344 seconds)
Published: Mon Dec 15 2014
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.