Exploring Solar Panel Efficiency Breakthroughs in 2022

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
This video is brought to you by Brilliant. There’s always the promise of some big   breakthrough that’s going to change everything.  Well, scientists have just smashed the solar   panel efficiency record, and it could mean a  big change for the future of renewable energy.   This isn’t just more hype, but a sign of  where things stand today and are heading.   However, this isn’t the only big  solar news from 2022. There’s been   a lot of very recent advancements from  perovskites to organic solar cells too,   so what does this mean for you and me? Let’s  see if we can come to a decision on this. I’ve covered a lot of solar panel  news over the past few years,   as well as my experience with  my own solar panels on my home.   Solar power is practically the grandfather of  the renewable energy family, and for good reason:   there’s a limitless energy source shining down  on us literally every day, just waiting to be   harnessed. Just one hour of power from the sun is  more than the entire world uses in a year! It’s   why I’m so fascinated by it, but the big downside  is that we can’t capture all of that energy. Along those lines, many people  leave comments that basically say,   “solar panels aren’t efficient enough,” and most  likely, “never will be.” That line of thinking   always surprises me because the technologies we  all take for granted today were the breakthroughs   of a decade ago, so the breakthroughs  of today are where things are heading. In just the last few months, we’ve seen  some exciting advancements in solar,   some that we’ve been waiting for nearly ten years  for. So if you’ve been holding off for the right   benchmark–perhaps a target efficiency rate, or  the right type of material to get into commercial   use–your wait may be over, but let’s run  through some of the more interesting updates,   as well as some of the gotchas  and what it means for us. First, we have to talk about some of  the biggest news on the solar front,   and that’s the fact that the US Department of  Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory   just set a new solar cell efficiency record  of 39.5%. This was accomplished under similar   lighting conditions to the sun, which is  a stark change from the last world record.   Earlier experimental solar cells showed  top efficiency rates of 47.1% in 2019,   but that was only when exposed  to extremely concentrated light. So how did they do it? Rather than adding  more light (like the last record did),   NREL’s record-breaking cells use inverted  metamorphic multijunction (IMM) cells. These cells   have three layers stacked on top of one another,  each made of a different material: gallium indium   phosphide on top, gallium arsenide in center,  and gallium indium arsenide on the bottom. Each   soak in a different range of light wavelengths,  which lets the cell capture more energy from the   whole light spectrum.You can also find three  hundred “quantum wells” in the middle layer,   which was the key to unlocking these cells’ new  efficiency rate These wells extended the bandgap   in the cell, which increased the amount of  light that the cell could absorb overall. NREL isn’t the only one who's had success  squeezing out more energy by tweaking their solar   cell design. A team co-led by the University of  Surrey increased the amount of energy absorbed by   their wafer-thin photovoltaic panels by 25%. The  panels themselves are only one micrometer thick,   but they’re made with a honeycomb-esque layer that  allows for light absorption. In silicon cells,   nearly ⅓ of the light that hits the cell usually  bounces right off, but the textured design of   these thin photovoltaic cells traps the light  in the solar cell to increase the efficiency.   This design was inspired by nature  -- butterfly wings and bird eyes   already do this to some degree. In the lab, the  team saw absorption rates of 26.3 mA/cm2, a 25%   increase on the previous  record of 19.72 mA/cm2 in 2017. The efficiency rate isn’t too shabby, either:  these cells have an efficiency rate of 21%,   with the expectation that further  tweaks will nudge that number higher,   possibly even higher than other  commercially-available photovoltaics. Solar panels usually go hand in hand  with silicon (which is used in 95%   of panels in today’s market), but there’s  been a lingering beacon on the horizon   of the solar world: perovskites. I’ve  touched on these in previous videos. Perovskites are a group of synthetic materials  that are defined by their crystallographic   structure. In general, they easily coat surfaces,  which means that they can be used in cells on   their own or in tandem with other technologies  (like our existing crystalline silicon cells).   These perovskite semiconductors can convert  the energy-rich blue spectrum of sunlight   into energy, so when used in  tandem with silicon sub-cells,   we can get efficiency rates of up to 30% (compared  to 25% in single-junction perovskite cells). Perovskites are meant to be the golden trio:  cheap to produce, competitively efficient,   and thin and lightweight enough to apply  practically anywhere. That’s why researchers   have been chomping at the bit to get them on  the market, but there have been a few logistical   hurdles before perovskites could attempt to  give silicon cells a run for their money. The first problem is one of perovskite’s biggest  hurdles: the durability factor. Perovskite cell’s   thin and light nature are a perk, but it also  means that they’re fragile, which is not great   for a material that is going to be pitted  against rain, sun, hail, and everything in   between. Samples used to break before researchers  could even make it across the lab to be tested! If   the samples cannot be handled in the laboratory,  they cannot withstand the occasional hailstorm or   stresses applied by wind loading and torsion  on the solar panel frame in the real world. Thankfully, they’ve come a long way since then.  An April study found that organometallic compounds   could be used as an additive to help improve the  cells’ lifespan, efficiency, and stability. The   enhanced cells maintained 98% of the cell’s  original 25% power conversion efficiency rate   after 1500 hours of use, and they also passed  the damp heat stability tests with flying colors. Researchers have also been diving deeper into why  perovskite works like it does, both the good and   the bad. In May 2022, scientists at Cambridge  University and Japan’s Okinawa Institute of   Technology (OIST) used imaging techniques to  observe the structure of perovskite films at   the nanoscale, especially when light actually  hits the film. They found one of the culprits   behind perovskite’s infamous photodegradation  problem: nanoscopic trap clusters. These are   defects in the material that show up as pockets  from the cell processing, which ultimately make   the film less efficient and structurally fragile.  The main way to combat these efficiency-limiting   carrier traps is to remove them during the  manufacturing process through careful tuning   of the structural and chemical design. Make  these tweaks large-scale-friendly, and you have   a recipe for making more of these films while also  making them better in the performance department. What if making new solar cells was  as simple as printing a newspaper?   That’s what the producers of organic  power cells hope to accomplish,   and as of now, they’re ready to push  this tech into the worldwide market. Organic power cells are made by printing  photovoltaic material onto flexible materials   like plastic sheets. These paper-thin solar  cells are composed entirely of organic materials:   flexible, lightweight, and quick to  manufacture with printing technology   (the same process as printing newspapers!) They  cost half as much to make as silicon-based cells,   and they’re also 100X lighter. Each  square meter weighs less than 2 kilograms,   and that’s likely to dip  down to 1 kilogram in 2023. Unlike silicon cells, their conversion efficiency  rate doesn’t drop when used indoors, which makes   them extra appealing for devices like smart  speakers, sensors, and other wearables that may   not get to see a lot of actual direct sunlight.  This makes use of existing ambient light,   converting some of it to electrical power reducing  the load on small batteries and charging devices. The efficiency rate leaves a  little to be desired at 10%,   but these cells can also be used for around  20 years, which already dwarfs the current   perovskite lifespans (more on that later). As  more businesses start to ramp up production,   that mass production has the  potential to cut the costs in half. These “print-to-order” solar cells are  starting to hit the market on a global scale.   German startup Heliatek is beginning  mass production of organic solar cells   as early as this year, with a goal to produce  600,000 square meters (and a max production   capacity of 1.1 million square meters a year!)  Brazilian startup Sunew also has these organic   cells in production, producing over 10,000  square meters of organic solar cells so far   for vehicle rooftops (since they’re  big electric-vehicle fans). Sweden’s   Epishine put its miniature solar harvesting  modules on the market just this past December,   boasting an energy-conversion rate of 13%  and a lifespan of 10 years. These can be used   for temperature and humidity control sensors,  fire alarms, card readers, and other small–yet   important–devices that often blend into the  background. And then you have Ricoh in Japan,   starting on a smaller scale. They only produce 100  square meters a year, but that’s enough to power   50,000 small smart devices, from wearables  to safety sensors in tunnels and bridges. Even these cool cells have room to  improve, and researchers have found   two key developments with the potential to  really help organic cells capture that spark. Strap yourself in, we’re going to get  real nerdy in here. Let’s talk chirality. DNA (and other helix-shaped molecules) are  considered chiral. That design is everywhere   in nature, and it’s key to practically everything  from our genetic makeup to photosynthesis.   They’re asymmetrical, and as electrons go  through the structure, they separate charges   created by the light (meaning that light can be  converted into biochemicals more efficiently). Now usually, molecules stay with  their own structural cliques … it’s   kind of like high school … (chiral  with chiral, achiral with achiral,   etc). However, researchers at the University  of Illinois Urbana-Champaign found that when   they applied achiral conjugated polymers with  a solvent, the solution eventually evaporated   to leave behind reassembled polymers: more  specifically, helixes, aka, chiral structures. Going from achiral to chiral  structures is a pretty big deal,   especially when it comes to applying the  idea towards organic solar energy. In theory,   scientists can apply that chiral structure (and  all the energy-producing goodness that comes with   it) to materials that normally require achiral  conjugated polymers to function, like solar cells. Secondly, let’s talk about everyone’s favorite  subject: perfluorinated sulfuric acid ionomers.   (No? Just me?) Let me explain: to make  fully-printable organic solar cells,   you need hole-transporting materials. That’s hole,  not whole … you gotta love the english language.   These are HTMs for short. One such promising  HTM has been PEDOT:PSS, a conducting polymer   complex that is used to make printable  devices. It’s been around since the 1990s,   but it’s falling short today. Unfortunately  it disperses in water and is very acidic,   which can impact the efficiency and  stability of the PEDOT:SS-based solar cells. To combat this, researchers at Huazhong  University of Science and Technology   and the Institute of Materials for Electronics  and Energy Technology (i-MEET) have come up   with PEDOT:F, a new polymer complex that  disperses in alcohol and has low acidity.   With this new formula, organic  photovoltaics have been shown to   have a power conversion efficiency of  15% and retained 83% of their initial   efficiency under constant illumination at  maximum power for a total of 1,330 hours. These new solar developments may not be the  most attention-grabbing to the average person,   but they are a clear sign that there’s still  more to solar energy on the horizon. So what   can we actually take from these developments,  and what does it mean for the industry at large? First, as exciting as breaking the  world record of solar efficiency is,   NREL’s solar cell design still has its own  disadvantages. For one, producing this type   of cell is still going to be expensive at this  point, which is a problem that already hobbles   the renewable energy industry at large. Mass  producing cells with this level of efficiency   may still be a long way off, and we would  need to find a way to do so while keeping   the overall costs low enough to not  price major consumers out of the market. The University of Surrey’s honeycomb design,  on the other hand, seems to target that problem   directly. These cells use less silicon overall,  which translates to cost savings in the production   process. There’s a lot of potential to how we  can use them, too: even while textured, the film   layer is still super thin, which makes them light  and versatile enough to go practically anywhere! The next step is to get the show on the road  by finding commercial partners and developing   manufacturing techniques. As you may have  guessed, that’s no small feat in itself,   and for now, this design is  still a long way from the market,   an unfortunate fate for many promising  renewable technologies in the making. So how about perovskites, the solar industry’s  shining beacon and simultaneous problem child? Perovskite cells are finally on the market  now, but they’re nowhere near where fans hoped   they would be, and they’re definitely  not over the commercialization hurdle   just yet. A lot of this can be attributed  to their fickle nature in the field.   Both silicon and perovskite solar  cells have set records above 25%   recently, so the power itself isn’t  necessarily the problem: it’s the endurance. Unfortunately, perovskite cells in the field  lose 10% of their cell’s efficiency after a   few months of use. When you compare that to  silicon cells–whose manufacturers guarantee   that panels will maintain 80% of their  performance for sometimes 30-40 years–that’s   a tough act to follow. Perovskite cells need  to last at least 20 years in the field to   meet the US Department of Energy’s Solar Energy  Technology Office (SETO) 2030 goals of $0.02/kWh. Manufacturing will likely be the final major  hurdle to commercializing perovskite solar panels.   It’s a bit of a catch 22: we need financing  to scale up manufacturing and develop cells   at large scale, however, financing will only  be available when the scale up looks feasible. Here’s the good news: perovskites  don’t HAVE to outshine silicon cells.   You can also use them in tandem cells,  where a perovskite layer is stacked on TOP   of a silicon cell . (Talk about the best  of both worlds!) The materials absorb   different light wavelengths, which means  you get complementary energy harvesting. So how about organic cells? The idea itself is  still pretty attractive. These types of cells   could use their lightweight and flexible nature  pretty much anywhere, from domed roofs, glass,   and other oddly-shaped surfaces that couldn’t  support the heavier silicon-based panels. These guys probably won’t be powering your  neighborhood anytime soon, but they have found   their own special niche: specifically,  smaller devices, including wearables. Why are wearables such a big deal? Most  use single-use batteries that need to be   replaced every 1-2 years. That’s a big deal for  this segment when the global market for smart   sensors alone is expected to reach $29.6 billion  in 2026, according to MarketsandMarkets. Current   solar tech doesn’t quite cut it  for these smaller applications yet,   as silicon doesn’t work as well indoors, and  perovskite cells only last a few years at a time. True, their efficiency rate is  still a little skimpy (at least,   compared to their other solar counterparts).  Hopefully, further studies into chirality and   other polymer solutions may help boost  that efficiency rate in the long run,   making the “printable solar cell”  a staple in the solar community. While we’re most likely still a few years away  from seeing these admittedly cool developments   actually make ripples on the market, it’s a  clear sign of where things are heading. However,   if you’re considering solar for your  home, don’t wait. Solar panels are   efficient enough today to achieve a lot of  the goals you probably have for your home.   Waiting for the next big thing pretty much  ensures that you’ll always be waiting … because   there’s always something better around the  corner. If you live in the US, don’t miss   out on the current Federal tax solar rebate,  which will be dropping at the end of the year.   You can use my EnergySage portal (link in  the description) to help research and get   quotes from installers in your area. I used  EnergySage to research products and find   my own installer for my house and absolutely  loved the experience. Don’t wait and miss out. If you’d like to learn more about  the science behind solar panels,   I'd strongly recommend checking out Brilliant.  They have fantastic interactive courses,   like the Scientific Thinking course. But if  you really want to get your head wrapped around   some of what we covered with these solar  panel breakthroughs, be sure to check out   the Solar Energy course. It walks you through  everything from EM Basics to solar panel band   gaps. The course was created in collaboration  with an MIT mechanical engineer and researcher.   I’ve been working my way through that one and  am really enjoying learning at my own pace.   If you get stuck, Brilliant will give you in-depth  explanations, which helps you understand the “why”   and “how” of something. And you’re learning  the concepts by applying them through fun and   interactive problems yourself. I’ve found this  active learning is how I learn best. Join over   11 million people learning on Brilliant today.  Go to https://brilliant.org/Undecided to sign up   for free. And also, the first 200 people will  get 20% off their annual premium membership.   Thanks to Brilliant and to all of  you for supporting the channel. So are you still undecided? Do you think these  advancements are a good sign of what’s to come?   Jump into the comments and let me know and  be sure to check out my follow up podcast   Still TBD where we’ll be discussing some  of your feedback. If you liked this video,   be sure to check out one of these videos over  here. And thanks to all of my patrons for your   continued support and welcome to new supporter  + member P W, and producers Jessica Nash,   and Oliver Hilton. And thanks to all of you  for watching. I’ll see you in the next one.
Info
Channel: Undecided with Matt Ferrell
Views: 1,791,185
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: future of renewable energy, solar cell, solar energy, solar panel breakthrough, solar panel efficiency, solar panel efficiency 2022, solar panel manufacturing process, solar panel news, solar panel system, solar panel technology, solar panels, solar panels for beginners, solar panels for home, solar panels for home cost, solar panels how they work, solar panels worth it, solar panels worth it or not, undecided with matt ferrell
Id: m8crjuL8FFs
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 16min 4sec (964 seconds)
Published: Tue Jul 12 2022
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.