Everyone Everywhere Needs Waymond Wang (and Ke Huy Quan)

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
I walked into a movie theater to see Everything Everywhere All At Once expecting a genre bending multiverse movie infused with many interlocking layers of philosophical and cultural meaning And I was not disappointed What I was not expecting however was to witness one of the most challenging and subversive representations of masculinity that I’ve ever seen in any genre In order to explain what I mean we’ll need to shift the focus away from the film’s protagonist, played by the incredible Michelle Yeoh and over to the character of her husband played by actor Ke Huy Quan Ke became famous as a child actor in the 1980s for the roles as Short Round in the Temple of Doom and Data in The Goonies Despite that early success, he couldn’t find many opportunities for a young Asian American actor in Hollywood So he eventually quit acting altogether In his triumphant return to the big screen, after nearly two decades he's brought to life a truly extraordinary example of empathetic manhood If you were to only watch the first half of Everything Everywhere All At Once the idea that Waymond Wang could be an avatar for positive masculinity would seem a little strange Evelyn: Sometimes I wonder how he would have survived without me When we first meet Waymond, in his original incarnation he appears to be sweet, almost childlike, but ultimately naive Evelyn: She puts a lean on our laundromat and you know what your father does? Evelyn: He brings her cookies! A goofy, silly, bumbling father whose marriage is in the process of failing Evelyn: No more google eyes! He’s timid, conflict averse, and perfectly content to let his wife run their business Waymond: We'll talk later? These traits are often associated with a range of familiar subordinate male archetypes in Hollywood media In interviews, directing duo Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert referred to collectively as Daniels have said they wanted to turn a “beta male” character into a hero Daniel Scheinert: We needed someone who was convincingly sweet, kind of beta male, Daniel Scheinert: who you'd almost laugh at and dismiss That in and of itself isn’t unusual, most movie heroes begin their journey as someone decidedly un-super, who then grows in power over time Mary Jane: Wow! Waymond is different What’s remarkable is that the filmmakers managed to turn him into a hero without giving him his own character arc Waymond: Evelyn? Waymond: What's going on? He doesn’t gain any new powers, or skills, or learn to fight Waymond: Everyone stay calm! I think it's time for a family discussion All the other characters evolve in transformative ways over the course of the film, as you’d expect but Waymond doesn’t change He is essentially the same character at the end of the movie that he was at the very beginning On a fundamental storytelling level that shouldn’t really work. Incredibly, the Daniels manage to make Waymond, and his empathic worldview the anchor point around which everything else in the movie ultimately bends Before we explore how they pulled off that impressive narrative trick, it’s important to note that the entire concept of alpha and beta males as related to human men is pure pseudoscience nonsense Dolittle: The strongest male is called the alpha male Dolittle: The alpha male is the big boss, he wants everybody to know Dolittle: he's the boss male. You have to be him. The boss of all the males! The very idea that animal behavior can be neatly mapped on to the complexities of human society is absurd Sheldon: When I fail to open this jar and you succeed Sheldon: it will establish you as the alpha male Still, the erroneous myth persists and is perpetuated in popular culture Gray: Who's the alpha? Owen: You're looking at him kid Sheldon: That's not surprising, this is something I long ago came to peace Sheldon: with in my role as the beta male So let’s talk very briefly about how terms like “beta male” are typically used because I think that’s what the Daniels are attempting to subvert in the character of Waymond Marty: That's him In fiction we expect this type of character to be a pushover, a doormat a man who lets other more dominant men walk all over him Goyle: Watch where you're going Longbottom Classmate: I have a question Classmate: My wife says I'm a pushover but what if deep down inside Classmate: I'm really just a nice guy? If there’s a wife involved the guy usually falls into the old Henpecked Husband trope Mrs. Daffy: Haul your anchor lose of that chair and get busy with the house chores wherein a long-suffering man submits to the demands of a controlling overbearing wife Madeline: Could you just not breathe? This subordinate put-upon man is often a comedic figure and he’s been around for as long as Hollywood itself. When men, like Waymond, are presented as too nice, too vulnerable, Classmate: Don't even think about it or too accommodating it’s framed as a significant obstacle to him being taken seriously as a real man This media pattern has been especially common in stereotypical depictions of the meek often de-sexualized Asian man Jock: You Know karate? Takashi: no Jock: Good Male characters who refuse to fight, or refuse to fight back are nearly always mocked as weak, effeminate, or cowardly Dave: Do something, stand up for yourself! Hit him back Dave: Link, hit him back. Where are you going? Leonard: I'm going to assert my dominance face-to-face Of course subordinate male characters only exist in relation to the equally fictional myth of the “alpha man" Waymond: Wow, what a fast elevator! In Everything Everywhere All At Once our original Waymond is juxtaposed with another version of himself from another universe Alpha Waymond: I told you to stay low and out of sight! Alpha Waymond: I'm not your husband, at least not the one you know Alpha Waymond: I'm another version of him from another life path, another universe Alpha Waymond: This is where I am from - The Alphaverse Alpha Waymond is shown to be assertive, demanding, and aggressive Initially the audience is just as enamored with this new Waymond as Evelyn appears to be Alpha Waymond: Every rejection, every disappointment has lead you here It turns out however that Alpha Waymond isn’t exactly all he’s cracked up to be He’s controlling, impatient, quick to violence, and distrustful of others He builds Evelyn up, tells her she’s the most important person in the whole multiverse then abandons her the moment she doesn’t live up to his expectations Alpha Waymond: I'm sorry Evelyn. I need to go Evelyn: What? Alpha Waymond: I need to find the right Evelyn. And this one... Alpha Waymond: is not the one Evelyn: No no. Wait! Let me try again! Evelyn: Alpha Waymond? Alpha Waymond is just using Evelyn as indeed all the Alphas are in their attempt to "Make the Alphaverse Great Again" Alpha Waymond: This is the Alphaverse mission Alpha Waymond: to take us back to how it's supposed to be If Everything Everywhere all at Once were a normal movie with normal character acs, our original Waymond would essentially turn into Alpha Waymond by the end of the story He’d learn to temper his sensitivity with an unhealthy dose of aggression thus transforming from the sweet naive guy who won’t even kill a bug to a domineering dude who takes out a room full of security guards to protect his wife He might even be given a cathartic “finally grew a spine” moment where he loudly demands a divorce Stu: Because whatever this is ain't working for me! Stu: Let's do this! This type of hypermasculine transformation is a supertrope in storytelling This is how pop culture reinforces the myth that the correct way to be a man is to be aggressive, intimidating and most importantly to dominate others It’s not an exaggeration to say some that kind of power fantasy underpins the origin story of most male heroes in media But Everything Everywhere all at Once is anything but a typical movie As the story progresses the audience experiences an epiphany Evelyn: My silly husband Evelyn: probably making things worse We realize our initial impression of Waymond was completely wrong Deirdre: Okay, you can let her go We share this realization with Evelyn as she suddenly sees her “silly husband” in a new light Waymond isn’t actually passive or submissive He’s been quietly proactive throughout the movie Waymond: Everything is going to be okay Constantly striving to smooth things over with the tax auditor in order to save their laundromat Evelyn: Oh, tomorrow is better- Waymond: Ah ah thank you thank you. 6pm. Thank you so much! Deirdre: Thank you for the cookies He’s not getting what he wants out of his marriage so he’s taking steps to change it The divorce was his idea after all part of his desperate plan to salvage their relationship Waymond: I wanted to star off the new year on a new foot And he does all of that while also expressing vulnerability and attempting to balance his needs with the feelings of others In short, he knows what he wants and he never stops trying to get it he just doesn’t do it in a domineering way Waymond: I know you're all fighting because you're scare and confused Waymond: I'm confused too Waymond’s worldview is articulated in this powerful speech about 2/3rds of the way through the film Waymond: The only thing I do know is that we have to be kind His words echo those of Sonmi 451 from Cloud Atlas Sonmi 451: And by each crime and every kindness Sonmi 451: we birth our future Waymond: Please be kind Waymond: especially when we don't know what's going on If you heard it in the real world Waymond’s plea to “be kind” could come across as... Waymond: Be kind ...a little cliché or at best unrealistic Evelyn: It's too late Waymond So I think it’s useful to break down exactly what he means when he says “be kind” For him kindness is not putting on blinders ignoring the negative, or being fake nice Waymond: Think about it, unless it's an emergency, whenever I try to talk to you Waymond: you always get pulled away Waymond manifests kindness through patience, communication, and empathy Waymond: Ah, sorry, my wife confuses her hobbies for businesses Waymond: An honest mistake And the movie presents all of those traits as useful pragmatic skills This brings us to Business Waymond a version of the character from a divergent timeline where he and Evelyn never got married. This Waymond defends original Waymond’s perspective without of course knowing that’s what he’s doing since he’s unaware of the multiverse Business Waymond: You think I'm weak, don't you? He’s speaking directly to the audience, as much as he is to Evelyn when admonishing us for our previous assumptions about him Business Waymond: When I choose to see the good side of things Business Waymond: I'm not being naive Business Waymond: It is strategic and necessary Business Waymond: It's how I've learned to survive through everything In reality, he’s not naive He understands the oppressive nature of the world but chooses to fight back in his own way... Waymond: Can't we just stop fighting! ...with empathy joy and hope Business Waymond: This is how I fight It’s interesting to note that although Business Waymond should be considered the pinnacle of success, we don’t envy him Business Waymond: In another life... Business Waymond: I would have really liked... Business Waymond: just doing laundry and taxes with you Instead we pity him for what he never had laundry and taxes with Evelyn as his wife in a distant universe Waymond is the anti-cynic, the antidote to nihilism and his worldview is represented in the film through the visual motif of googly eyes When Evelyn finally adopts his perspective she affixes a third googly eye to her forehead This marks the moment where the Daniels flip the action movie genre on its head Waymond’s worldview runs counter to the underlying message in almost all action movies the reductive notion that violence can solve all conflicts regardless of the circumstances Waymond: Evelyn! Evelyn please, no more! Waymond understands that the way to ultimately win against a stronger oppressive force is to create a situation where the foot-soldiers of the powerful refuse to keep fighting you Waymond: What are you doing? Evelyn: I'm learning to fight like you As noted eloquently in the book The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow “Revolutions are rarely won in open combat. When revolutionaries win, it’s usually because the bulk of those sent to crush them refuse to shoot, or just go home.” And this is precisely what happens in Everything Everywhere all at Once Evelyn uses her new found multiversal power to learn why each of her opponents is hurting inside and then she gives them what’s missing After which, one by one, they all lose interest in trying to fight her Violence doesn’t solve this conflict, it can’t because the enemy is a cynical nihilistic bagel devouring love and meaning and everything else Empathy is what solves it. As it must Notice that even though he’s pivotal to the film’s resolution Waymond’s masculinity doesn’t require him to become an action guy He doesn’t need to take center stage or fix the problem himself Waymond is content to inspire his wife and then stand back and support her while she wins the day It’s particularly important that this depiction of transcendent masculinity is embodied by an asian man As Chris Kranadi pointed out in his Stale article about Waymond’s character “It’s a rare depiction of an Asian male lead that not only rejects and deconstructs Hollywood’s stereotypes of them but also serves as a necessary evolution for Asian representation in cinema.” At the beginning of this video I said that Waymond doesn’t have a character arc well it turns out that by the time the credits roll it’s us the audience who’ve been given a character arc Over the course of the film, our perspective has shifted so dramatically that we’ve come to understand Waymond and more importantly to embrace his revolutionary worldview. This shift in perspective also reframes the social expectations Hollywood so often places on masculinity Like kindness, empathy can occasionally feel ​​naive or ethereal just a pretty, empty word with little to reinforce it Especially in difficult times like ours I’d argue though that what Waymond advocates is actionable empathy It’s empathy that you don’t wait around for it’s the kind of radical empathy that we can use to fundamentally change our reality Jonathan: Thanks for watching. In other videos on YouTube this is where you'd see Jonathan: a sponsorship for some sort of corporate ad but Jonathan: we don't do that here. Everything here is 100% funded by viewers like you Jonathan: So if you like what you see, please consider going over to Patreon to support the project there Jonathan: I've also left some links below to help detail other ways you can help out like Paypal and there's a wishlist Jonathan: Anything you can do to help out is much appreciated it helps keep us going and sustainable into the future Jonathan: Quick reminder, we have a podcast as well, you can find links to that below Jonathan: Again i really appreciate all your support. I'll see you again next time
Info
Channel: Pop Culture Detective
Views: 2,640,573
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: video essay, Everything Everywhere All At Once, Waymond Wang, Hollywood manhood, masculinity, alpha beta male debunked, Ke Huy Quan
Id: O7YnbGszcb8
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 18min 48sec (1128 seconds)
Published: Wed Jul 20 2022
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.