El reparto de África: por qué sus fronteras son injustas

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Did you ever think why there are so many straight lines on the borders of North Africa? Or which is the identity and common history of some of the African countries? Up next we will tell you the biggest curiosities of the limits drawn on the continent and why African borders hide great injustices. But first we invite you to become a member of Un Mundo Inmenso. Through a monthly contribution you can support us so that the channel continues to grow independently and you can also access some extra content and participate in surveys. Because of distance and ignorance many times Africa is spoken of as a unit. However, there are huge differences between countries like Tunisia, Ethiopia and Namibia, for example. We find very different climates, languages, religions and stories. And even the distances are huge. For example, Rabat and Cape Town are separated by almost 8000 kilometers. About 600 more than those which separate Mexico's city from Buenos Aires and more than double the distance between Lisbon and Moscow. When we see a political map of the continent we may think that borders have centuries of history or that were traced as the towns grew. But this was not like that. At the end of the 19th century the so-called "The Scramble for Africa" came In the city of Berlin seven European countries met: France, Spain, Portugal, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and Belgium. In just three months between 1884 and 1885, these seven powers distributed almost all the African territory. That is, a group of Europeans divided the continent regardless not even the opinion of the inhabitants nor of the towns that existed there. Before the deal, there were two stable independent states. One was Liberia, which had been an U.S. colony and had almost half a century of independence. And the other was Abyssinia, which we know it today like Ethiopia. The Berlin conference respected the independence of Liberia but not the one of Abyssinia. I was planned to be in Italian hands, but the Ethiopians resisted the invasion and maintained their independence. In this way, the rest of the continent was left to those seven countries. France kept with Algeria, Tunisia, part of Morocco, the great regions of West French Africa and French Equatorial Africa, Djibouti, Madagascar and Comoros Islands. The British occupied Egypt, Sudan, East British Africa, Somaliland, Southern and Northern Rhodesia, Nigeria, Mauritius, and the current Sierra Leone, Gambia, Ghana, Botswana, South Africa and Malawi. Spain, which already had fewer colonies, kept with parts of current Morocco and from Western Sahara, in addition to Equatorial Guinea. Portugal, meanwhile, controlled the current Angola, Mozambique, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde and São Tomé and Príncipe. Germany arrived on the continent divided into three major regions: Western, Eastern and Southeast. It included large current countries like Cameroon, Namibia, Tanzania and part of Nigeria. Italy stayed with the current Libya, Somalia and Eritrea. Finally, Belgium was left with a large region in the center of the continent: the Belgian Congo. Although the territory was actually owned by its king, that made a resource exploitation through indigenous slaves and a genocide in which between 5 and 10 million people died. This division, made far from Africa did not respect the history of the people. In addition, it resulted in fixed borders that little had to do with the local reality. With the passage of time, these limits were not only modified, but strengthened. In the 1960s there was a boom of independence and many of the countries we know today emerged. To avoid new wars, it was chosen to respect the old colonial boundaries. In this way, there were few modifications in the political map. One of the most relevant is the separation of Eritrea: in 1993 it achieved independence from Ethiopia after years of wars. The other big change is the division of Sudan: in 2011, after a referendum, South Sudan was born, which is still the youngest country in the world. But those limits drawn in Berlin and in force even today keep some oddities. Take for example the case of Gambia. This country is totally surrounded by Senegal and extends a few kilometers to each margin of the Gambia river. It is that this area had been occupied by the British, who wanted to keep it. Or Namibia, which in the north of its territory stretches very strangely eastward The explanation is that the Germans wanted to join their possessions that were on both coasts. That's why they yielded other territories so Namibia reached the Zambeze River. They thought that from there they could reach the current Tanzania, although they failed, since it is a river of very difficult navigation. This rarity on the map leaves us about two kilometers from a fourfold border between countries, something that does not exist a lot in the world. We can also rescue the case of Cabinda, which is a small exclave of Angola. This region has oil reserves. For some, it has culturally little to do with the rest of Angola, so they have claimed their sovereignty. Also, the borders have separated what was united. It is the case of the Tuareg. This town is currently divided in five countries: Mali, Burkina Faso, Algeria, Niger and Libya. Although the truth is that in the middle of the Sahara, there are very few milestones that mark the transnational boundaries. That is, what we see very fixed on a map It doesn't quite agree with reality, where the lines are more permeable. Unfortunately, during the later decades after the independences numerous civil wars have been seen and new forms of colonization have emerged. France, far from moving away, continues with a great financial presence. Fourteen countries use the CFA Franc as currency, which is printed in France and has a parity with the euro. Meanwhile, natural resources exploitation continues by foreign hands. But the continent is still synonymous of underdevelopment and many of its countries have huge poverty rates. The question arises about the decision to respect those old borders drawn in Berlin. Was it the best to avoid worse wars? Should a solution be sought? Maybe the answer is the agreement Burkina Faso and Niger reached in 2013. After decades of litigation, they exchanged 18 cities and resolved border disputes. 14 went from Niger to Burkina Faso and four made the reverse way. Both countries were submitted to the International Court of Justice of The Hague and they followed the ruling that was issued. In your opinion, how important is it the border delimitation for the history of the people? And in Africa, what solutions should be searched to solve border problems? Leave your comment below.
Info
Channel: Un Mundo Inmenso
Views: 2,332,154
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: África, límites África, borders, frontera, reparto de África, tuareg, etiopía, abisinia, liberia, argelia, gambia, namibia, sudáfrica, cuádruple frontera, norte de áfrica, sahara, colonización, independencia áfrica, descolonización, franco CFA, euro, túnez, rabat, ciudad del cabo, leopoldo II, congo belga, egipto, nigeria, camerun
Id: axsgxSRmYZc
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 7min 44sec (464 seconds)
Published: Tue Feb 18 2020
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.