East vs. West German Panzer Units | Hyperwar 1989

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
In the late 1980s, all eyes were on the Germanies  as the setting for a potential Third World War,   should one kick off between  NATO and the Warsaw Pact. There were of course the significant non-German  militaries ready to go, but West and East Germany   themselves boasted significant armored forces  that would’ve faced off against each other. This video is going to compare East and West  German tank units of the time from the crew to   battalion-level to show what they would have been  working with if the Hyperwar kicked off in 1989. We’ll start at the base, the Tank Platoon. The West Germans were relatively  straight forward. They had just one   Tank Platoon organization, consisting of 4 tanks. Generally speaking in 1989, Tank Battalions  under Panzergrenadier Brigades, the primary   infantry force, were equipped with variants  of the Leopard 1, primarily upgrades to the   1A1 standard including the 1A1A1, as well  as the 1A5. One of the key exceptions was   the 10th Panzer Division’s 30th Panzergrenadier  Brigade which had Leopard 2A4s. Tank Battalions   under Panzer Brigades meanwhile were equipped  with various batch variants of the Leopard 2. Both tanks were crewed by 4 soldiers. A Commander,  Gunner, Loader, and Driver. One tank per platoon   would be commanded by the Platoon Leader, who  would be a Lieutenant in one platoon per Company   and an NCO in two platoons. Tanks would be  split into two Half-Platoons or Sections,   one under the Platoon Leader and one  under the Deputy, who was an NCO. Compare this to the East German platoon.  Unlike the West Germans, the East Germans   had two distinct organizations. Tank Platoons  part of Tank Regiments consisted of 3 tanks,   while those under Motor Rifle  Regiments, the infantry force,   consisted of 4 tanks. I haven’t seen  anything definitive on this matter,   but I assume the infantry organizations got 4  tanks per platoon because 4 is easier to split   in pairs for attachment or maneuvering through  complex terrain. Three tanks had a logic to it   for Eastern tank organizations because they’re  easier and faster to control during an armored   maneuver. Additionally, in the context of a  battle, a Tank Platoon attached to a Motor Rifle   Company may be the only tanks in a particular  area, so the ability for it to provide its own   overwatch may have also been a factor. A  Tank Platoon operating under its own Tank   Company would probably have other Tank Platoons  supporting it so that’d be less of a concern. There was also some added complexity with regard  to tank models. Regiments part of Motor Rifle   Divisions, regardless if they were Tank or Motor  Rifle Regiments, ran variants of the T-55. But the   9th Panzer Division and most of the 7th Panzer  Division—East Germany’s two tank divisions—were   equipped with T-72s, T-72Ms and T-72M1s from the  Soviet Union, Poland and Czechoslovakia. This   extended to the Tank Battalion under the Motor  Rifle Regiment in each of those Panzer Divisions. So if you had a four square matrix  of regiment versus division,   tank platoons under Tank Regiments regardless of  division had 3 tanks, and Motor Rifle Regiments   regardless of division had 4. But all regiments  under the Panzer Divisions had T-72s by 1990,   while all regiments under Motor  Rifle Divisions still had T-55s. Because the T-55 was a 4-man tank with a  dedicated loader, each of those platoons   had between 12 and 16 crewmembers under  a Lieutenant. But T-72s were autoloaded,   so each tank only had 3 crewmembers. So  those platoons had between 9 and 12 crews. Companies At the company-level   there were more similarities than differences.  Both the East and West German company consisted   of 3 Tank Platoons. In the East German  case, these were all commanded by officers,   while in the West German case one was  led by an officer and two by NCOs. Both had a headquarters element. The East  had a tank for the Company Commander,   a motorcycle for the Deputy of Equipment  and Armaments, and a Ural 375D truck for   the Hauptfeldwebel and a clerk. There was also a  Deputy for Political Work in Warsaw Pact fashion. The West German equivalent also had only one  tank for the Company Commander at this time.   Unlike today, the West German tank company  had only one officer in the Command Group,   the company commander who was  usually a Captain or Major. The second staff member was the Company  Sergeant or Kompaniefeldwebel, normally   held by a Hauptfeldwebel. The difference was  in East Germany Hauptfeldwebel was the name for   the appointment equivalent to Company Sergeant  Major or First Sergeant, but it could be held   by a senior NCO, such as a Stabsfeldwebel, or  a grade of Warrant Officer called a Fähnrich,   which was added to their rank structure  in 1979 in Soviet fashion. There was no   East German rank of Hauptfeldwebel. But in West  Germany, the appointment was Kompaniefeldwebel,   which was held by an NCO normally  at the rank of Hauptfeldwebel. But in any case, while the East German  Hauptfeldwebel rode around in a Ural,   the West German company had a  Company Sergeant’s Troop. At   the time this included an Unimog 2-ton  truck and Mercedes-Benz 5-ton truck. The Company Troop, which was a sort  of command group, included the tank,   a half-ton jeep, and three  motorcycles for messengers. The West German Company also had two Replacement  Crews, a total of 6 junior enlisted crewmembers   that could fill vacancies. Having these  spare crews at the company-level allowed   platoons to still conduct exercises  even when slightly understrength. A   tank with even one crewmember down is at best  significantly degraded in its performance. One level up, most East and West German Tank  Battalions consisted of 3 Tank Companies and   a staff. The West German equivalent had  a much more substantial staff though,   with a 183-man Staff and Supply Company  versus the 43-man East German battalion staff. In terms of armor, the West German Battalion  HQ had 2 tanks and the East German had 1. West German Brigades had 1 or 2  of this type of Tank Battalion,   depending on if it was a Panzer  or Panzergrenadier Brigade. East   German Tank Regiments meanwhile had 3 of these  battalions, while Motor Rifle Regiments had 1. But there was also the case of  the West German mixed battalion. For the 1980s the West Germans wanted to  increase the amount of tank units in the   field without increasing the number  of armored vehicles in service. This   entailed reducing each tank platoon from 5,  as was the case since the 1950s, to 4 tanks,   reducing the tanks in the company HQ from  2 to 1, and the tanks in the battalion HQ   from 3 to 2. They used those savings to create  an additional tank company per Tank Battalion. This was also done with  Panzergrenadier Battalions,   and the new companies were moved into  their own mixed fourth battalion,   numbered as the 1st battalion in the  brigade basically. In Panzer Brigades,   this mixed battalion had 2 tank companies  and 1 infantry company, while Panzergrenadier   Brigades had 2 infantry and 1 tank company,  matching the number of other combat battalions. But this battalion’s staff was actually a cadre   force that would only be activated for  war and exercises. During peacetime,   these new companies were actually housed  with one of the three original battalions. The East and West Germans had somewhat  similar practices when it came to tank   unit organization at the low-levels,  the biggest difference being the more   substantial logistics in the West German  battalion and the dimorphism in East German   units depending on if they were in a tank  regiment or supported an infantry regiment. The platforms were obviously quite  different though. I’m not going to   get into comparing the specifications  of tanks because that’s not what I do,   but the West Germans had significantly more of the  newest Leopard 2s than the East Germans had T-72s. East Germany had 4 Motor Rifle Divisions and 2  Panzer Divisions in the first line. The former   type each had about 214 T-55 tanks in theory.  The 9th Panzer Division had 322 T-72s while the   slightly smaller 7th Panzer Division had 223 T-72s  and 40 T-55As in the 1990 handover of equipment. The larger West Germany on the other  hand had 4 Panzergrenadier Divisions   and 6 Panzer Divisions in its active  field army. There were some exceptions,   like the 3rd Panzer Division under the 1st  Dutch Corps. But broadly speaking if you were   to assume the generic number of subunits at  full-strength, Panzergrenadier Divisions were   meant to have 254 tanks and Panzer Divisions  were meant to have 309. So roughly comparable,   although about 34 of these were contained  in an Armored Reconnaissance Battalion   that supported the division. The East German  equivalent had BMP-1s as its heavy hitters. But in terms of fielded maneuver battalions,  the West German Panzer Division had 5 pure   Tank Battalions, 2 Mixed Tank Battalions, and  1 Mixed Panzergrenadier Battalion, in addition   to the 4 pure Panzergrenadier Battalions. To  compare, the East German Panzer Division had   10 pure Tank Battalions and 4-ish Motor Rifle  Battalions. 4-ish because the East German Tank   Regiment didn’t have an infantry battalion,  they at most had a Motor Rifle Company each. So what the East Germans traded in lack of  resiliency at the platoon- and company-level   with only 3 tanks per platoon they gained  some with more Tank Battalions in the field   for a similar amount of tanks, which is probably  more critical in the case of a large-scale   conflict. They also fielded more divisions as  a proportion of their population than the West. Not that I think this bean counting matters  all that much given the West Germans had   three times the active Tank Divisions  as the East and fielded an arguably   better tank. But I find these sorts of  comparisons at least mildly interesting. If you want more info on German armored  units, check out this video on the West’s   Panzergrenadier units in the 1950s and 60s, their  armored infantry force. I’ll see you over there!
Info
Channel: Battle Order
Views: 231,432
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: TO&E, structure, organization, military, equipment, tactics
Id: hsbKzm_xPXc
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 10min 38sec (638 seconds)
Published: Wed Dec 27 2023
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.