Common Grace: Foundations - An Overview of Systematic Theology with R.C. Sproul

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
SPROUL: We come now to a whole new section  in the study of systematic theology,   and it’s that subdivision of theology  that we call soteriology. Now,   this word may seem foreign to many  people. It’s not your everyday   common word that is used in the church, but it  is a very important word because it comprises   those matters that pertain to our salvation.  The word ‘soteriology’ comes from the Greek,   word ‘sozo’ or ‘sozomai’ is the verb in the New  Testament Greek that means ‘to save’ and the   noun of the word ‘savior’ is the word ‘soter’.  And so we have soteriology coming from that.   Just a word in passing that in the Scriptures  when the Bible speaks of salvation, it speaks of   salvation in more than one way. We are accustomed  to using the term ‘salvation’ or being saved   in the ultimate sense of being redeemed by God  and brought into a saving relationship to Him that   will last for eternity. But in the Scriptures, for  God to save somebody can mean several different   things. The word ‘to save’ refers to any act  of rescue from a serious and dire circumstance   or from a calamitous situation. If you are  restored from a life-threatening disease,   you are saved. If you are rescued from capture in  battle, you are saved. Any rescue from calamity is   a kind of salvation biblically and that will be  important as we will see in a minute why that is. But then there is the ultimate sense of salvation  where in that regard the great calamity from which   we are saved is from God. That is, we are saved  from having to face God in His wrath on the day   of judgment and we are rescued from that wrath  which is to come, so that God is at the same time   the Savior and the One from whom we are saved. But now in the subject of soteriology when we   study the matters of salvation at the center of  our concern (particularly in Reformed theology)   is the concept of grace. I can remember when I  was a graduate student in the Netherlands, my   professor Dr. Berkhouwer once made the observation  that the very essence of theology is grace   and the essence of ethics is gratitude.  And he saw the link between those two,   that from the beginning to the end salvation is  of the Lord and it is not something that we earn   or that we deserve, but it is given freely  from the mercy and from the love of God.   But when we speak of grace, the first thing that  we have in view is the distinction between grace   and justice. Justice is something that is  earned or merited or is due to a person   by some standard. And, usually when we  think of justice we think of the standard   of works. And when Paul writes about our salvation  he makes it very clear that if we were saved by   our works then our salvation would not be  of grace. But since it is of grace and that   indicates that it is not of works. But justice has  to do with correspondence to some kind of standard   of merit or of earning. I say that by way of  contrast that grace is something that is not   deserved, that is not merited, that is not earned,  it is something that is given freely by God.   Something that He is never obligated or required  to do. We remember His statements to Moses that   are quoted by Paul in Romans wherein God said  “I will have mercy upon whom I will have mercy.”   That grace is always a divine prerogative, never  a requirement and it’s critical that we understand   that because it gets in our heads quite frequently  to think that God owes us something. And that   if He were really good He would give us a  better life or so on. The minute we think   that God owes us something, remember that if you  think it’s owed, you’re not thinking any more   about grace. You’re thinking about justice.  Because grace is never owed. And even if God   is pleased to be gracious to this person and  withhold that same grace from this person,   it’s still a matter of grace to this person and  because He’s gracious to this one does not mean   He’s therefore obligated to give the same grace  to somebody else because we’re not talking about   obligation here, we are not talking about justice,  we’re talking about sovereign mercy and grace. And so the classic definition of  grace is unmerited or unearned favor.   It is when God behaves in a favorable manner  to us in a way where we have no claim to it   by virtue of our merit that we are speaking of  grace. Now in theology and in our study of the   doctrines of grace, the first distinction that  we have to make in this section (and remember   it is the theologian’s prerogative always to make  distinctions) the first distinction here regarding   grace is a distinction that’s important and that  is a distinction between what we call common grace   and what we call special grace.   Common grace and special grace. Common grace is  called common because it is virtually universal.   It refers to that grace that God gives to all  people indiscriminately. The mercy and kindness   that extends to the human race as distinguished  from the special grace of redemption that God   gives to the saved. So common grace is the grace  of God that we all experience in a broad sense. For example, the Bible when it speaks  of the providence of God says that   the rain falls on the just and on the unjust. Now  think about that for a moment. How important is   it for us to have rain in certain sequences and  periodicies in order for us to survive as people?   The crops that we grow are dependent upon rain.  I will never forget when we had the problem in   Florida of the drought that created the wildfires  that were life threatening where a whole county   was evacuated – every single person in that county  had to be evacuated. And I remember living nearby   those fires and people had been praying for rain  and I happened to be at a golf course one day in   the lunch room when all of a sudden this mass of  people started yelling and shouting and cheering   as they came in off the golf course soaking wet  because there was this cloudburst and that’s   something you – I’d never seen in my life at a  golf course – golfers cheering when it started to   rain! Usually they’re all grumbling and mumbling  if they’re forced off the golf course because   of the storm but on this occasion the drought  had been so severe that everybody was cheering. Well, rain is something that we tend  to take for granted but the Bible says   God sends His rain to the just and to the unjust.  You may have two farmers in the same town.   One may be devout and committed to the things  of God. The other person may be utterly profane,   as pagan as he can possibly be. Both of them  need the rain for their crops and God in His   goodness waters the earth, and so both profit  from the shower. Not because they’ve earned it.   Neither one of them really deserves the rain to  nurture their crops but God’s showers and rains   falls upon the just as well as on the unjust. As  the old cliche that it rains on the just fella and   the unjust fella. The problem is that the unjust  fella usually has the just fella’s umbrella.   But, in any case, common grace refers to the  kindness and benefits and the favors that God   pours out liberally to people whether  they are believers or not believers. But we’re not just talking here about  rain. We are talking about a multitude of   favors that are enjoyed by people who are not in  fellowship with God through personal redemption.   And we see that these things that God – gifts  of life and health and safety and order and   all the rest that we need to survive is something  that God does in order to preserve His creation.   From the fall of man, God did not utterly destroy  the whole human race but He has preserved the   human race even to this day. And we have seen a  progress in history of the impact of God’s grace   on just simply the standard of living of people.  I know that not everyone in this world enjoys   an equal standard of living. Not everyone in  American has the same standard of living and   certainly the basic standard of living in America  is much greater than in other parts of the world   where people live in abject poverty and severe  deprivation. Nevertheless, even in those areas   the life expectancy and the quality of life  tends to be significantly better than it was for   the masses of the populated areas of the world in  centuries past. And so, that just life itself has   become easier and better as it were  as the progress of history. And not   the least of the reasons that has provoked the  improvement of life and the conditions of life   (which many people will attribute simply  to science or to the secular enterprise of   education) we have to look to the influence  of the Christian church on the world over   the past two thousand years. You realize that the  orphanage movement in history was stimulated and   made in main by the Christian community. That  the hospital movement, the educational movement   of early centuries was sparked and stimulated by  the church and even the development of science   in many ways was stimulated by the Christians who  were convinced that they had a responsibility to   dress and till and keep the earth and to be good  stewards of this planet that God has given to us. And so if we would chart the history of the  influence of the Christian church on law,   on ethics, on mercy, on education  and all these different spheres,   we would see that quite to the contrary of those  who decry the impact of religion on the world   that really the general quality of life on this  planet has been vastly improved by the influence   of Christianity. Now why is that? One of the  reasons that is is that the church is always   called, and the Christian is called to imitate  Christ as Christ imitates God. And as Christians   engaged in the Christian life, we are called  to be imitators of God. That’s what it means   to be made in the image of God. And if God is  concerned about common grace, the general welfare   of the human race, what is our responsibility?  We are also called to be concerned about the   general welfare of the human race. In fact, Jesus  says if your neighbor (or even in this case if   it’s your enemy) is naked, you clothe him, if  he’s hungry, you feed him, and if he’s thirsty,   you give him to drink, if he’s in prison, you go  and visit him, if he’s sick, you minister to him.   And we see Jesus demonstrating in His ministry  (for example, the parable of the Good Samaritan)   indicates the priority that Jesus gives to  His church to be concerned not only in the   special grace realm of evangelism, but also to be  concerned about the general welfare of the human   race. What does James tell us but the essence of  true religion is the care of orphans and widows. Now, I labor this point for  a reason. That there has been   a strange divorce that has taken place in the last  hundred or so years in the Christian community.   A crisis occurred in the 19th century with  the advent of 19th century liberal theology,   which by and large rejected the supernatural  aspects of the Christian faith, denied the   virgin birth, denied the resurrection, denied  the atonement, the deity of Christ and so on.   And they had a crisis because they had basically  rejected historic Christianity and yet they had   tons of money invested in careers and in church  buildings and programs and institutions all over   the place, and so in order for them to remain  viable – from a social perspective – they had to   create a new agenda for the church. Well,  they said we already have an agenda and it’s   the humanitarian outreach concerns, the ministries  of mercy, and they began to put their emphasis on   taking care of the social agenda at the expense of  evangelism. And orthodox Christians were saying,   “Wait a minute! The church is still about the  supernatural questions of personal reconciliation   and we’ve got to almost double our efforts for  evangelism to make up for the repudiation of it   that is coming from the liberal wing.” And this  unnatural schism took place where evangelicals   began to say, “Oh, social action, social concern,  concern for the general welfare of the human race   that’s a liberal matter. That’s a liberal agenda.  Whereas concern for souls and personal salvation,   that’s the real concern of the church.” If  Christ would hear that, He would say ‘A pox   on both of your houses’. Because the church is  called not only to the ministry of special grace   but also to the ministry of common grace. And that  means as Christians we have to be concerned about   poverty, we have to be concerned about hunger, we  have to be concerned about people having the basic   necessities of life in terms of housing, in terms  of clothing and reaching out to their misery. I can remember when the AIDS epidemic first  started out and I heard people who claim to   be Christian saying that they weren’t going to  do anything to support the victims of AIDS. And   I said, “Why would you say that?” And they said,  “Well, because AIDS is contracted out of a wicked,   sinful lifestyle either through drugs  or homosexual activity and so on,   and we can’t be supportive of  it.” And I said, “Wait a minute!   If you find somebody sick and dying in a ditch,  you don’t ask them how they got in that ditch.   The love of Christ is to constrain you to pull  them out of that ditch and do everything you   can to – and that’s what this story of the Good  Samaritan is all about.” It’s not that anybody is   qualified to receive the ministry or the mercy  of God. I’m not qualified. If somebody who’s   contracted AIDS is not qualified to be helped by  the mercy of the church, then neither am I. And   neither are you. Because all of us receive the  benefits of this mercy on the basis of grace.   And particularly those of us who have received  what we might call uncommon grace or special grace   should be the last people in the world to  eschew the granting of mercy commonly to people. Now, another point I want to make about this  point of great conflict in the Christian church.   When can a Christian join hands or stand shoulder  to shoulder with pagans or with contrary religions   or even apostate religions? Francis Schaefer once  said that when it comes to common grace matters,   the Christian must be a co-belligerent  with all kinds of people who are not   Christians. You have a march for the rights of  the unborn. Before you protest abortion on demand,   do you check out the membership card of the  person who is standing with you? This is a   common grace issue. And I will stand next  to New Age people. I will stand next to   demon worshippers if I have to if they have a  concern about the general welfare of the unborn   and I will stand shoulder to shoulder with those  people in such a public protest. Because that’s   an arena of common grace where we commonly  are to reach out and be supportive of people.   Now, if it’s a worship service, am I going to  stand shoulder to shoulder in a worship service   with members of a Satanic cult? Am I going  to stand shoulder to shoulder in a worship   service or in a prayer breakfast with Muslims?  No. I can’t do that because that’s the realm of   special grace. And so we need to understand  the difference between these two. One last point as our time is running out,  and that has to do with the love of God.   We hear in Romans that (in Romans 9) that Paul  makes the observation (which we’ll explore more   in our next session) “Jacob have I loved, Esau  have I hated.” Now, whatever that text means, as   problematic as it is, obviously there is one sense  in which Jacob is loved in a way that Esau isn’t.   So what does that do with our popular  concept that God loves everybody   and He loves everybody unconditionally. Well,  He doesn’t love everybody unconditionally but   here again we make a distinction  between God’s love of benevolence   and His love of complacency. Now, that word is  derived from an older form of the word. When we   say that somebody is complacent today we mean that  they are smug, you know, that they really kind of   above it all and somewhat arrogant. That’s not  what is meant here. The love of benevolence has   to do with the general kindness that God has  and His concern for the general well-being   of human beings. In that sense it can be said that  God loves everybody, in the sense in which we’ve   been talking that He makes the sun to shine on  everybody. He gives the gift of air and breath and   life and nutrients to everybody indiscriminately.  The love of complacency has to do with   His redemptive love. The love that is  focused chiefly on His beloved Son, Christ,   and which spills out to those who are  in Christ. That God has a special love   for the redeemed that He doesn’t have for the  rest of the world. And that’s another part of   the distinction between the common grace of God  and the special grace of God because there’s an   astonishment in the Scripture about the special  love of God that we experience in salvation.
Info
Channel: Ligonier Ministries
Views: 13,682
Rating: 4.9207048 out of 5
Keywords: foundations, common grace, systematic, systematic theology, overview of systematic theology, theology, reformed, reformed theology, rc sproul, dr rc sproul, ligonier ministries, grace, what is common grace, understanding common grace, salvation, earning grace, mercy, love, the love of god, special grace, the lord, god, the bible, jesus christ, christian, christianity, christian doctrine
Id: jrRjlWaGHag
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 23min 13sec (1393 seconds)
Published: Wed Apr 28 2021
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.