CNN: Have UFOs been to Earth?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: CNN
Views: 540,102
Rating: 4.5934663 out of 5
Keywords: Robert, Hastings, Robert Hastings, UFO, UFOs, UFO's, 2010, extra terrestrial, earth, alien, outer space, space, nuclear weapons, CNN, News, CNN News, CNN TV, American Morning, interview
Id: IKcTxwvzv8M
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 5min 9sec (309 seconds)
Published: Wed Sep 29 2010
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I've had this opinion for a long time that if they do know something or anything the government has absolutely nothing to gain by telling us. Feeding our curiosity isn't their job and inciting fear (that they themselves have) wouldn't help either. Let's pretend for a moment that E.T. are present on the Earth in some capacity and demonstrate how incapable we are compared to them and your job is to research, keep track etc and you see first hand how hopeless outclassed we are. You'd be scared to death, and sometimes it's just better to let everyone live in blissful ignorance. If THEY exist and THEY are here everyone on Earth knowing about it isn't necessarily going to make things better. I'd personally still would rather know than not but I fully understand why anyone would be reluctant to share the truth especially a governing body.
People have the unfortunate habit of thinking in black-or-white but if there are UFO control groups, i.e. intelligence groups who manage this subject, I believe they would be inclined to take a "full spectrum domination" approach to the problem. I believe this "full spectrum" type of activity can be seen in the history of ufology, for example shortly after the Roswell incident after they issued an official denial there were suddenly rumors of other UFO crashes around the world, for example in Spitsbergen Norway, and these fictional stories originated within military intelligence. Another example of this strategy are the historical military films of real UFOs that have been randomly inserted into otherwise lack-luster TV documentaries. These clips are easy to miss unless you pay very close attention, and they never include a narrative reference or explanation, and they're often completely out of context, so the effect on viewing them is to generally dismiss them as unimportant or irrelevant "noise" in the documentary; the documentary is "poorly made and makes no sense".
The reason why these groups release real information mixed with disinformation simultaneously is because the groups are pursuing different, often contradictory aims. On the one hand they have to be accountable to the public, but on the other hand they have to remain in control. As they issue bland denials they're also engaged in counter-intelligence to surveil individuals and competition who are "in the know". They have to recruit scientists who will help them, but they don't want to cause mass-panic in the population and create nuisance chatter.
You can see this "full spectum" strategy played out in current events all the time, especially around the subject of false-flag terrorism. They plan and execute these events but they also have to be in the lead exposing them as shams. They're forced to play every side, even leading their own opposition. The classic example of this strategy are Jewish-run neonazi groups. It pays for them to be proactive instead of reactive, lead instead of engaging in damage-control after they've lost ground.
TL;DW: Robert Hastings talking about Press Club conference on UFO (2010) and UFO sightings (and hampering) over nuclear sites.