Christian man says humanists are debauched. Andrew Copson explains what Humanism is really all about
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Humanists UK
Views: 330,119
Rating: 4.8560286 out of 5
Keywords: BHA, Humanism, Secularism, Atheism, Agnosticism, Education, Talks, Lectures, BritishHumanistAssociation, Non-religious, Science, Philosophy, Andrew Copson (Person), Religion (TV Genre)
Id: 3j8jQkSydeo
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 5min 37sec (337 seconds)
Published: Tue Feb 03 2015
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Shit, i'm losing them to this suave talking humanist, he's swaying the crowd and i need to stop him before he leads them all away from Jesus, what i need to do is discredit him. Maybe i should bring up his obvious idolization for the most evil and well know of humanists, Hitler!
but no perhaps not, many of my colleagues have done that in the past and they were decried for something called Godwin's law, and they were accused of having an inherently weak argument that led them to mudslinging rather than countering with facts.
Quick i need to do something!
"POL POT"
oh yeah, disaster averted, discussion over.
"Did you just say Pol Pot? Blimey!"
Did I hear correctly? At the end he was saying that Pol Pot was the role model for humanists?
Wow.
I mean, we've all heard some outrageous things. But this one...
... Wow.
I love when Copson is saying how 40% of the British population holds humanist values although only 5% call themselves humanists, and he's interrupted by the Christian panelist.
Of course he wants to pick and chose. What are facts compared with his feelings and his sacred book of mythology.
When in doubt, pol pot.
Sounds like a fun cruise. Anyone wanna play shuffleboard with me on the Lido Deck?
Would you not think to yourself: "Maybe there's a reason people are laughing at me?
Wasn't it great to see so many people of different backgrounds and religions coming together in the joy of laughing at that person?
What does "the cancer of thanksgiving" even mean?