Chomsky BRILLIANTLY Dissects Trump, Democrats & RussiaGate

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Captions
so<font color="#E5E5E5"> noam chomsky brilliantly explained</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">American politics</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> on democracy now he</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">basically lays out</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> everything that's</font> going on in just the<font color="#E5E5E5"> most genius way</font> possible in under<font color="#CCCCCC"> ten minutes check it</font> out and then<font color="#E5E5E5"> we'll discuss explain</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">president Trump to us</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and assess the</font> massive response to him well Trump is<font color="#CCCCCC"> a</font> you know<font color="#E5E5E5"> I</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> think there are</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> a number of</font> illusions about Trump<font color="#CCCCCC"> if you take a look</font> at the Trump phenomenon<font color="#E5E5E5"> it's not very</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">surprising think back for the last</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> ten</font> or<font color="#CCCCCC"> fifteen years over Republican party</font> primaries and<font color="#E5E5E5"> remember what happened</font> during the primaries each<font color="#E5E5E5"> primary when</font> some candidate<font color="#E5E5E5"> rose from the base</font> they were so outlandish<font color="#E5E5E5"> that the</font> Republican establishment<font color="#CCCCCC"> tried</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> to crush</font> them<font color="#E5E5E5"> and succeeded in</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> doing it</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">Michelle Bachman</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Herman Cain Rick</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">Santorum anyone who was coming out</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> of</font> the base<font color="#E5E5E5"> was totally unacceptable to the</font> establishment<font color="#CCCCCC"> the change in 2016 is they</font> couldn't crush him<font color="#E5E5E5"> but the interesting</font> question is why was this happening why <font color="#CCCCCC">an election after election was the</font> voting base producing a candidate utterly<font color="#E5E5E5"> intolerable to the establishment</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">and the answer to that is think about</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">that the answer is not</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> very hard</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> to</font> discover during<font color="#CCCCCC"> the since the 1970s</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">during</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> this neoliberal period both of</font> the political parties<font color="#E5E5E5"> have shifted to</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">the right</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> the Democrats</font> by the<font color="#E5E5E5"> 1970s that pretty much abandoned</font> the working class in<font color="#CCCCCC"> the last gasp of</font> more or less<font color="#E5E5E5"> progressive Democratic</font> Party<font color="#E5E5E5"> the legislative probe proposals</font> was the humphrey-hawkins<font color="#E5E5E5"> full employment</font> act in 1978 which<font color="#E5E5E5"> Carter watered down so</font> that it had no teeth just became voluntary<font color="#E5E5E5"> but the Democrats had pretty</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">much abandoned the working class they</font> became pretty much what used to be called<font color="#E5E5E5"> moderate Republicans meanwhile</font> the Republicans<font color="#E5E5E5"> shifted so far</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> to the</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">right that they went completely off the</font> spectrum<font color="#CCCCCC"> of the two of the leading</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">political analysts of the American</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">Enterprise Institute Thomas</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Mann Norman</font> Ornstein about five or ten years ago described the<font color="#E5E5E5"> Republican Party as what</font> they called a radical insurgency<font color="#CCCCCC"> that</font> has abandoned parliamentary politics <font color="#E5E5E5">well why did that</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> happen it happened</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">because the Republicans faced a</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">difficult problem</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> they have a primary</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">constituency</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> a real constituency</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> extreme</font> wealth and corporate power<font color="#CCCCCC"> that's who</font> they have to<font color="#CCCCCC"> serve that's their</font> constituency<font color="#CCCCCC"> you can't get votes that</font> way so<font color="#E5E5E5"> you have to do something else to</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">get votes what do you do to</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> get votes</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">this was begun by Richard Nixon with the</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">Southern Strategy</font> try to pick<font color="#CCCCCC"> up a racist in the</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> South the</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">mid-1970s</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> poll</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> vibrantly one of the</font> Democrat Republican strategists hit<font color="#CCCCCC"> on a</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">brilliant idea</font> northern<font color="#CCCCCC"> catholics voted Democratic</font> tended to vote<font color="#E5E5E5"> Democratic a lot of</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">working-class the Republicans could pick</font> up that vote by pretending<font color="#CCCCCC"> cursorily</font> pretending to be opposed to abortion<font color="#E5E5E5"> by</font> the same pretense<font color="#CCCCCC"> they could pick up the</font> evangelical<font color="#CCCCCC"> vote</font> those are big votes<font color="#E5E5E5"> evangelicals</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">northern Catholics</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> notice the word</font> pretense<font color="#E5E5E5"> is crucial you go back to the</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">1960s every leading Republican figure</font> was strongly<font color="#E5E5E5"> what we call now pro-choice</font> the Republican<font color="#CCCCCC"> Party position was</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that's</font> Ronald Reagan<font color="#E5E5E5"> George HW Bush</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> all the</font> leadership<font color="#CCCCCC"> their position</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> was</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> portion is</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">not the government's</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> business</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> it's a</font> private business<font color="#E5E5E5"> government</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> has nothing</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">say about it they turned almost</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> on a</font> dime<font color="#E5E5E5"> in order to try to pick up a voting</font> base<font color="#E5E5E5"> on what are called cultural issues</font> same with gun rights the gun rights become a matter of<font color="#E5E5E5"> Holy Writ because he</font> can pick up part<font color="#E5E5E5"> of the population that</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">way in fact what they've done is put</font> together a coalition<font color="#E5E5E5"> of voters based on</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">issues that are basically onyx</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> you know</font> tolerable<font color="#CCCCCC"> to the establishment but they</font> don't like it<font color="#CCCCCC"> okay and they've got a</font> hold that those two<font color="#CCCCCC"> constituencies</font> together the real<font color="#E5E5E5"> constituency of wealth</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">and corporate power they're taken care</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">of by the</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> actual legislation so if you</font> look at the<font color="#E5E5E5"> legislation under chunk</font> Trump <font color="#E5E5E5">it's just lavash gifts to the wealth on</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">the corporate sector</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> the tax bill of the</font> deregulation<font color="#CCCCCC"> you know every case in</font> point that's kind of the job of<font color="#E5E5E5"> Mitch</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">McConnell and Paul Ryan those guys they</font> serve the real constituency<font color="#E5E5E5"> meanwhile</font> Trump has to<font color="#CCCCCC"> maintain</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> the voting</font> constituency<font color="#E5E5E5"> with one outrageous</font> position after<font color="#E5E5E5"> another that appeals to</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">some sector of the vote of the voting</font> base<font color="#E5E5E5"> and he's</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> doing</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> it very skillfully</font> it's a as just<font color="#CCCCCC"> as a political</font> manipulation<font color="#E5E5E5"> it's skillful work for the</font> rich and the powerful<font color="#CCCCCC"> chef's everybody</font> else<font color="#E5E5E5"> but get their votes that's not</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> a</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">swindle it's not an easy trick</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> he's</font> carrying<font color="#E5E5E5"> it off and I should say</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> the</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">Democrats are helping</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> him</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> they are take</font> the<font color="#E5E5E5"> focus on Russia</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> gate what's that all</font> about<font color="#E5E5E5"> I mean</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> it was pretty obvious</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> at</font> the beginning that<font color="#E5E5E5"> you're not gonna find</font> anything very<font color="#E5E5E5"> serious</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> about Russian</font> interference<font color="#E5E5E5"> and elections</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> I mean for</font> one thing<font color="#CCCCCC"> it's undetectable in the in</font> the 2016 election<font color="#E5E5E5"> of the Senate and the</font> house went the same<font color="#CCCCCC"> way as the executive</font> but nobody claims that was worse than interference<font color="#E5E5E5"> there in fact you know</font> Russian interference<font color="#E5E5E5"> in the election if</font> if it existed<font color="#E5E5E5"> was very slight a much</font> less say than the<font color="#E5E5E5"> interference by say</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">Israel the Israel the Prime Minister</font> Netanyahu<font color="#CCCCCC"> that goes to Congress</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">talks to a</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> joint session of Congress</font> without<font color="#E5E5E5"> even informing the White House</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">to attack Obama's policies I mean that's</font> dramatic interference with elections<font color="#E5E5E5"> not</font> whatever the Russians tried it's not <font color="#E5E5E5">gonna be anything like that and in fact</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">there's no interference in elections</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">that begins to compare with campaign</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">they remember</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that campaign funding</font> alone<font color="#E5E5E5"> gives you a very high predict</font> prediction of election electoral outcome <font color="#E5E5E5">it's again</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Tom Ferguson's</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> major</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> work</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">which shone this very persuasively</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">that's massive</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> interference and</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">elections</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> anything the Russians might</font> have done is going to be you know <font color="#E5E5E5">peanuts and compared as far as Trump</font> collusion with<font color="#E5E5E5"> the Russians that was</font> never<font color="#E5E5E5"> going to amount to anything</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> more</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">than minor corruption</font> you know maybe building a Trump Hotel <font color="#E5E5E5">and</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Red Square or something like</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">but</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> nothing of any significance the</font> Democrats invested everything in this issue<font color="#E5E5E5"> well turned out there was nothing</font> much<font color="#CCCCCC"> there they gave Trump</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> a huge gift</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">in fact they may have handed</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> him the</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">next election that's just that's a</font> matter of being so<font color="#CCCCCC"> you know</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> unwilling to</font> deal with fundamental issues that <font color="#CCCCCC">they're looking</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> for something on the</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">side</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> that'll</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> somehow give political</font> success<font color="#E5E5E5"> god damn</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> god damn</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that was</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> 8</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">minutes and 56 seconds of pure</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">brilliance he nailed it he nailed it in</font> every<font color="#CCCCCC"> way so he's saying</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> here's the</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">dynamic at play here the Republicans are</font> in<font color="#E5E5E5"> a very bad</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> position of having</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> to</font> serve their real<font color="#CCCCCC"> constituency which is</font> the mega wealthy and corporations<font color="#E5E5E5"> while</font> at the same<font color="#CCCCCC"> time getting</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> enough votes</font> from the<font color="#E5E5E5"> public so</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> you can't just go out</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">there and say what you're all</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> about</font> which is<font color="#E5E5E5"> tax cuts for the rich and</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">deregulation and things of</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that nature</font> and endless wars which helps the <font color="#E5E5E5">military-industrial complex</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> so what do</font> you have to do you got to go out there and<font color="#E5E5E5"> get</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> a ragtag group of</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> voters</font> together<font color="#E5E5E5"> and how do they go</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> about it</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">well first of all</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Southern Strategy</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> is</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">the old school playbook it's still in</font> effect to this day so they go after the you know<font color="#E5E5E5"> southern white racists</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> that you</font> know<font color="#E5E5E5"> neo Confederates you can call them</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">that's one group the other group is</font> evangelical Christians<font color="#E5E5E5"> then you have the</font> cultural reactionaries who they go<font color="#CCCCCC"> after</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">and then you know</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> gun lovers</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> so they try</font> to scrap together<font color="#E5E5E5"> they hit a bunch of</font> very specific<font color="#E5E5E5"> issues culturally to seek</font> to signal<font color="#CCCCCC"> to these people like I'm with</font> you<font color="#CCCCCC"> I'm on</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> your side</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and then</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> those</font> people<font color="#E5E5E5"> they extrapolate and they almost</font> project<font color="#CCCCCC"> onto the</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Republicans what they</font> want them<font color="#CCCCCC"> to be so not</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> only does this</font> guy agree to me on guns<font color="#E5E5E5"> he's also</font> looking out for me<font color="#E5E5E5"> and he's gonna like</font> cut my taxes and<font color="#CCCCCC"> stuff and the reality</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">is of course</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> 80% of the Republican</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> tax</font> bill Trump's tax bill goes to the top one percent over<font color="#CCCCCC"> a decade</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> so it's not</font> like<font color="#E5E5E5"> and Chomsky points</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> out</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that's not</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">an easy trick man like and I always said</font> the Republicans are good at marketing <font color="#E5E5E5">and they're good at making their case</font> because they are they take these just incredibly disliked positions<font color="#E5E5E5"> and they</font> find a way<font color="#CCCCCC"> through sheer confidence and</font> bluster<font color="#CCCCCC"> and marketing to win elections</font> that's<font color="#E5E5E5"> not a simple</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> thing to</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> do that's</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">very complex and Trump is</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> the best</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">example of it now the one thing I think</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">Chomsky misses there is not only is it</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">the</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> ragtag</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> group of you</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> know the base</font> which the elites are actually scared of <font color="#E5E5E5">the Republican base but they need them</font> for<font color="#E5E5E5"> the votes but</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> not only</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> does Trump</font> get those people <font color="#E5E5E5">Trump's cherry on top of a trick is the</font> fake populism<font color="#E5E5E5"> which I think got</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> him over</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">the top</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> because all it was those 70,000</font> votes in the Rust Belt that<font color="#E5E5E5"> really</font> turned the election over<font color="#E5E5E5"> to him and I</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">don't think he would have</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> been able to</font> win<font color="#E5E5E5"> without the fake populism and</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">without Hillary being objectively</font> terrible and not<font color="#E5E5E5"> doing any kind</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> of</font> populism and<font color="#E5E5E5"> just running on cliches and</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">almost expecting like she's entitled</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> to</font> win<font color="#CCCCCC"> so that's the the cherry</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> on top was</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">the fake populism that got Trump over</font> the edge<font color="#E5E5E5"> now in terms of the Democrats</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">God he nails it again he says and the</font> Democrats<font color="#E5E5E5"> are helping the Republicans</font> effectively not that they<font color="#E5E5E5"> want to who</font> said that's what ends up happening <font color="#E5E5E5">because they put all</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> their</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> eggs in the</font> wrong basket<font color="#CCCCCC"> the thing</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that they spoke</font> the most<font color="#E5E5E5"> about the thing that they focus</font> the<font color="#E5E5E5"> most about recently is Russia</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> gate</font> and it is the<font color="#CCCCCC"> malla report</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and then the</font> mother<font color="#E5E5E5"> report did not give them exactly</font> what<font color="#CCCCCC"> they</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> wanted now you could say it's</font> an open question on<font color="#E5E5E5"> obstruction of</font> justice<font color="#CCCCCC"> fair</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> enough I think there it's</font> clear Trump probably did obstruct justice<font color="#CCCCCC"> but what</font> the other<font color="#CCCCCC"> thing</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> that's clear is</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> muller</font> says no evidence of<font color="#CCCCCC"> collusion</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> not there</font> so when<font color="#E5E5E5"> you focus on that</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> non-stop and</font> then<font color="#E5E5E5"> it comes up giving</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> you not really</font> what you were looking<font color="#CCCCCC"> for</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> yeah that's</font> gonna end up<font color="#CCCCCC"> helping</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Trump I think</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and</font> whether or not they want to<font color="#CCCCCC"> admit it now</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">whether or not it's immediately</font> reflected in the polls<font color="#CCCCCC"> especially if</font> they keep doubling down<font color="#CCCCCC"> on that</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and why</font> are they<font color="#E5E5E5"> doing it that's the important</font> part<font color="#E5E5E5"> it's not just because hey they're</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">not that</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> smart</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> that's</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> not the only</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">reason why the Democrats are fucking</font> this<font color="#E5E5E5"> up massively but it's because they</font> fundamentally cannot focus<font color="#E5E5E5"> on the issues</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">that they need to focus</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> on</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> to in</font> elections<font color="#E5E5E5"> because for Democrats to</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> win</font> elections<font color="#E5E5E5"> and focus on the right issues</font> would mean they're holding<font color="#CCCCCC"> themselves to</font> very specific policies and very specific things that<font color="#CCCCCC"> they're</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> fighting for to help</font> the people<font color="#E5E5E5"> now ultimately establishment</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">Democrats don't care and don't want to</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">help to</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> people because</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> they also have</font> allegiances to<font color="#CCCCCC"> corporate</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> America and to</font> their donors<font color="#E5E5E5"> to</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> the elites</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> so think</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">about it because</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> now the</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Democrats are</font> in<font color="#E5E5E5"> a similar</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> position to</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> the Republicans</font> the Democrats<font color="#E5E5E5"> the establishment</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">Democrats need to keep serving</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> the</font> powerful and the<font color="#E5E5E5"> elites</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and the</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">corporations but they also have to try</font> to win elections how do you win elections<font color="#E5E5E5"> while still</font> maintaining<font color="#E5E5E5"> your loyalty to your funders</font> the elites how do you do<font color="#CCCCCC"> it if</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> you're a</font> Democrat while they're trying<font color="#E5E5E5"> to find</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">some way</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> to walk that tightrope</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and the</font> answer they came up with<font color="#E5E5E5"> is let's</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> just</font> talk about<font color="#E5E5E5"> Mulder</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> non-stop let's just</font> talk about<font color="#E5E5E5"> Russia gate and say collusion</font> non-stop<font color="#E5E5E5"> and that'll maybe help us win</font> an election<font color="#CCCCCC"> by</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> ignoring the main issues</font> that<font color="#CCCCCC"> people struggle with</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> health care</font> the economy wages endless war<font color="#CCCCCC"> extreme</font> poverty by<font color="#E5E5E5"> let's ignore the main issues</font> people struggle<font color="#CCCCCC"> with because</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> we can't</font> help though on that that much<font color="#E5E5E5"> because</font> we're beholden to the establishment<font color="#CCCCCC"> too</font> but we still<font color="#E5E5E5"> want</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> to</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> win so what are we</font> gonna do I don't<font color="#E5E5E5"> know make make a</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">mountain out of a molehill and</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> this side</font> issue of<font color="#E5E5E5"> the</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Muller report and Russia</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">gate make that the</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> number one thing</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> and</font> then that<font color="#E5E5E5"> is it's not gonna work dude</font> it's not gonna work<font color="#CCCCCC"> so thankfully</font> thankfully the cow is on the<font color="#E5E5E5"> way though because we do have</font> you<font color="#CCCCCC"> know</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> a new class of</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> Young</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Democrats</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">and a couple of</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> presidential candidates</font> Bernie<font color="#CCCCCC"> Tulsi and some others who will</font> focus<font color="#E5E5E5"> on the right issues and</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> actually</font> care about<font color="#E5E5E5"> it that's the good news the</font> bad<font color="#E5E5E5"> news is the dominant strain in the</font> Democratic<font color="#E5E5E5"> Party is</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> still the</font> establishment wing<font color="#E5E5E5"> and so that dynamic</font> that<font color="#CCCCCC"> Chomsky is talking about is still</font> alive and<font color="#CCCCCC"> well and it's beyond</font> <font color="#CCCCCC">frustrating</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and like he says</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> no kind</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> of</font> election interference comes<font color="#E5E5E5"> even</font> remotely close to<font color="#E5E5E5"> Israeli election</font> interference I would also say Saudi <font color="#CCCCCC">Election interference</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> but most</font> importantly corporate election interference where corporations<font color="#E5E5E5"> just</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> buy</font> the government<font color="#CCCCCC"> through campaign funding</font> and then get what they want and the regular people<font color="#CCCCCC"> get screwed</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> and if you're</font> not<font color="#E5E5E5"> talking about that as worse</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> than you</font> know<font color="#CCCCCC"> a</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> hundred thousand dollars in</font> facebook ads from fucking some Russian troll farm then you're being<font color="#CCCCCC"> mislead or</font> you're a dunce<font color="#E5E5E5"> so if you don't take it</font> from<font color="#E5E5E5"> me</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> on</font><font color="#E5E5E5"> Russia gate then take it</font><font color="#CCCCCC"> from</font> the world's<font color="#E5E5E5"> most prominent living</font> intellectual political<font color="#E5E5E5"> intellectual</font> <font color="#E5E5E5">that's Noam Chomsky</font>
Info
Channel: Secular Talk
Views: 1,316,052
Rating: 4.7046847 out of 5
Keywords: news, politics, election, 2020, noam chomsky, donald trump, bernie sanders, democrat, republican, liberal, gop, kyle kulinski show, kyle kulinski
Id: llzoItQgLOQ
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 47sec (947 seconds)
Published: Tue Apr 23 2019
Reddit Comments

This was great.

👍︎︎ 3 👤︎︎ u/ExpertResponse 📅︎︎ Apr 24 2019 🗫︎ replies

What’s Chomsky’s reason for ignoring all the DT/FSB conspiracy evidence. it’s all been out in the open.

👍︎︎ 2 👤︎︎ u/churchofpain 📅︎︎ Apr 24 2019 🗫︎ replies

https://old.reddit.com/r/seculartalk/comments/bgvza3/i_heard_chomskys_analysis_on_trump_and_russia_in/

I have refuted Chomsky’s arguments as relate to this here. What do you think, OP?

👍︎︎ 1 👤︎︎ u/[deleted] 📅︎︎ Apr 25 2019 🗫︎ replies
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.