ChatGPT vs Copilot vs Bard vs Claude - ¿Qué IA es mejor en 2024?

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Very good friends and welcome to La Manzana Morbida. A video that I was very, very excited about of doing. And, well, in recent years intelligence artificial has gained a lot of prominence and has transformed the way we interact With technology. From writing codes without having much idea from programming to having conversations. Artificial intelligence we could say that is beginning to be present everywhere. But which is the best in 2024? Today we are going to explore and compare four of the most prominent platforms. ChatGPT, Copilot, Cloud and BART. So make yourself comfortable, let's get started. Let's start with ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a generative language model developed by OpenAI and known for its ability to maintain natural conversations and generate coherent text and, we could say, contextually relevant. At this time, through its website, We can choose two models, GPT 3.5 and GPT 4, which is its most advanced model. We can only use the latter if we have a subscription to ChatGPT Plus for something more 20 euros a month, everything must be said. The main differences between GPT 3.5 and GPT 4 lies in its processing capacity, multimodal functionality, context management and internet connection. GPT 4 is capable of handling more indications complex and nuanced than GPT 3.5. Besides, while GPT 3.5 only accepts text requests, GPT told you that it is multimodal, that is, supports text and visual input, which allows you to understand and describe practically any picture. This means that GPT 4 can generate text from visual elements such as photographs and diagrams, you can also create images using Dalí's technology 3. For example, if I tell you to analyze this diagram of iPhone sales and write a text of at least 300 words analyzing it, Not only does it do it, but it does it very well. In terms of context management, GPT 4 offers a context window and size significantly larger than GPT 3.5. This allows GPT 4 to retain important details during a chat session, which improves the coherence and relevance of their responses, especially if we maintain a very long conversation with many nuances in the questions to the answers. Last but not least, GPT 4 allows you to connect to the internet, something GPT 3.5 cannot do, so your knowledge is limited to September 2021. And as I said, it can also generate images with Dalí 3 technology, which we cannot do with GPT 3.5. And if it was not enough, ChatGPT can use plugins and their newly released GPTs. Plugins are extensions created by developers external ones that serve to provide more capabilities to ChatGPT. There are an infinite number of them and for many uses. different. For example, if I activate this plugin designed to offer summaries of videos of YouTube and ask ChatGPT to make me a summary of it, and describing the apps what I mention in it, he does it very well. Lastly, we have the GPTs, which are a customized version of ChatGPT that are designed for specific tasks. We can create our own or find one from their GPT store that they just launched. For example, I regularly use this created for text correction. Since it is already configured for it, I only have I paste the text and it gives me an answer very complete and detailed. The good thing is that we save a lot of time using GPTs when we have to do frequently tasks that require asking ChatGPT to act in a certain way. Of course, I see a very big drawback to ChatGPT and its GPT4 model, And even if you pay the plus subscription, you are limited to 40 messages every 3 hours, which seem very few to me if you are a user that you use it daily for your workflow. We leave ChatGPT to talk now about Copilot, the Microsoft alternative that works a form very similar to ChatGPT but with some advantages and disadvantages. Copilot is developed by Microsoft, but also by OpenAI and as a result of the agreement between both companies. This allows Copilot to slowly leave updating with features that are coming out first on ChatGPT. For example, we can use technology GPT4 and soon they will also be able to be used Custom GPTs. The advantage of Copilot over ChatGPT is that, For example, the use of technology GPT4 is not limited to paying users like if it happens in ChatGPT, but in Copilot we can use it freely without having to pay anything. Additionally, message limitations per day of Copilot are much less annoying, so to speak so, that in ChatGPT. At Copilot we have up to 300 messages per day with a limit of 30 messages per chat, more than enough for a large part of users. Copilot also allows you to work in a multimodal way, that is to say, we could send you images so you can interact with them or ask it to generate images. For example, I'm going to ask you to create the image of a kitten in a jungle, with a green hat or a kitten in general. Well, he's going to do it in a few seconds. The good thing, I insist, is that this is not limited to paying users as if it happens on ChatGPT. Now, I do see a major disadvantage. regarding ChatGPT and it is the community behind it. For example, in ChatGPT I told you that we had an infinite number of plugins and in Copilot just we have a few plugins and also selected by Microsoft itself. And regarding the GPTs, The OpenAI store looks like it's going to be much larger than what you can have Microsoft out. Additionally, Microsoft just announced a subscription called Copilot Pro, which offers some added advantages over to the free version. In this case it would be priority access to GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo technologies at peak times, Copilot integration into applications of Microsoft 365 and a higher image limit that can be created daily with technology of DALI 3. We move on to Cloud, an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by Antropic, which is a company founded by a former OpenAI worker. Among its main strengths is your ability to read, analyze and summarize files that we can upload through your website. Furthermore, they can contain a large amount of words since it has a context window which can cover up to 100,000 tokens, which It is approximately 75,000 words. However, has some obvious disadvantages to ChatGPT and Copilot. For example, you do not have an internet connection, It is not available in Spain, nor does it have integration with plugins or similar that expand their capabilities. Let's say you are more or less focused on working with texts based on their own knowledge or in files that we may send to you. And I must say that for some uses even I like your answers better than ChatGPT's and Copilot. Now later we are going to do some tests to compare precisely the four. And finally let's talk about BART. BART is the artificial intelligence chatbot developed by Google based on the model of Lambda language and which came out in Spain on July 13 of last year. A few weeks ago they presented Gemini, which is the most advanced model of intelligence artificial Google and that in some characteristics It even surpasses OpenAI's GPT-4 technology. However, at the moment it is not integrated into Google BART in Spanish. And well, let's see, just like in the previous three, Its operation consists of interacting with through a chat, but in this case with updated information, since it continuously extracts information from internet thanks to integration with the search engine of Google. BART is completely free and has no limitations of messages apparently. And I say apparently because it is not specified neither. Now, I have to admit that in my opinion, before doing some tests now, He has always seemed to me the weakest of the four, both for the quality of their answers and for the possibility of being able to use plugins that improve the things that we can ask for from BART. It also cannot generate images, something that we can do for example with Copilot and ChatGPT. Well, once the presentations are made Of the four models, it is true that perhaps It's been a little long, but it's just that I had to tell you all this, Now is the time to test them. And for this I have compiled a few questions quite varied to, well, see the answers they give us and be able to compare. I warn you, in ChatGPT I am going to use the most advanced, in this case GPT-4, and in Copilot the creative mode, which is what they announce also uses GPT-4. Ready? Well come on, let's get to the first question. Come on, let's start with GPT-4 on ChatGPT, and the first question is a technical question. How can I optimize a ranking algorithm of images in Python? This question, Well, let's see, it will allow us to evaluate how every artificial intelligence addresses problems programming and optimization. I hit send, and while ChatGPT is contextualizing, I'm going to put the question to the rest as well. of alternatives. For example, I activate creative mode here, in Copilot, I stick and send, and we wait. We leave while Cloud, I'll ask the question and we'll see. And finally I paste the question to Bart and we wait. to respond. Let's go back to ChatGPT to see if it's finished yet. to make your answer. And as we see, it is still in the process of respond, but with a sufficient explanation well structured and seems knowledgeable quite advanced technicians. Copilot, you have seen that the answer when I have stayed within the question. Until then it had not started. I consider this a negative point. Let's see how things go in Cloud in the meantime. And Cloud is practically done answering. It's true that Cloud's answer seems a little less elaborate than the one we were doing ChatGPT. And let's see Bart, Bart indeed He has made a pretty good answer and also It seems pretty fast because he had already finished writing everything this while GPT-4 was still in the process. Anyway, you can pause the video and then analyze, Those of you who are more knowledgeable in this, if the question of one or the other has been more correctly elaborate. But it gives me the feeling, so soon, that the most complete answer could be that of ChatGPT. Bart's is very much on par. Cloud's seems a little more vague. And Copilot, unfortunately, it still ends here to respond. So let's speed up the process a little Let's see when it ends. Okay, Copilot just finished. And well, here we are seeing that indeed It is not a very elaborate answer. He has practically invited us to visit some web pages at the bottom of the response, as you see, so that, well, let's look for more information there. So I have a clear winner here. Now let's go with a creative question. I'm going to ask our assistants to write a short story about a trip to Mars. Let's go pasting it. Ultimately, the purpose of this question is to show the ability of each chatbot to generate creative and narrative content. Let's go to Copilot, we'll paste the question, We go to Cloud, we paste the question and we go to Bart. And I want to make sure Bart speeds with the one who writes his answer, because he has given me the feeling that it was quite fast precisely writing the answer from before. And indeed, eye, The speed of the response is not bad at all. GPT-4 is still at it. Copilot, until you click on the window, it doesn't start write. And Cloud is in it too. So the one you wrote the story in a faster way, without place Without a doubt, it's Bart. He has also given it the title The Trip to Mars. Once upon a time there was a girl Martina who dreamed of traveling to the planet Mars since she was little, She had been fascinated. Anyway, the beginning seems good. Then there is a knot and Martina continued working as an astronaut and carried out several more missions to space. Her dream of traveling to Mars had come true. and she decided to continue exploring the universe. So she has a well-marked outcome. Okay, in Cloud's case, Well, It's also a shorter answer than Bart's, but at the end of the day, we have asked a short story, since she has stuck to what we have asked him. Copilot is still at it. And Chat-GPT, in this case, well, it also seems to be over. And from what I'm seeing and reading, in the year 2084 humanity was finally ready for the biggest step of it. Okay, a manned trip to Mars, The protagonist in that story is Eva. Maybe I even like the beginning of GPT-4 better. I liked Bart's speed. I think the story is best written It is Chat-GPT. Cloud, well, It doesn't seem like she did it wrong, although she did. It's true that I see it as very short. And nothing, let's wait for Copilot to finish because, well, it takes its time. He is the slow friend of the equation. I was, I don't know if you accelerated me in the video seen the face, but he was reading while Copilot wrote the story and I must say that I liked him a lot. It's true that I asked you for a short story, but, oysters, I think he is the best of the four. I really invite you, so as not to make the video, I'm not going to read the answers of the four literally, I invite you to take breaks and go analyzing you, when you are seeing the video, the answers they are giving us to each one so that, well, you too can get your conclusions. But to me, input, He's giving me the feeling that he's the best story, in this case, Copilot takes it, although he is terribly slow. Okay, the next question is general knowledge. I'm going to ask you what the impacts are. most significant environmental impacts of climate change. Here, we will be able to appreciate how they handle current affairs and general knowledge. Let's go with Chat-GPT, let's go with Copilot, let's go with Cloud, in this case, and let's go with BART. And wait for a response. We are going to make sure that, indeed, BART's response may be the fastest and we could already reach the first conclusion. Sure enough, BART begins to respond and toss off. Besides, from what we are seeing, increase in temperature global, increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, changes in precipitation patterns, ocean acidification, species extinction... It seems that the answer is correct, indeed. Cloud already responded while we were reading BART's response and, from what we see, yes, you also agree with your analysis about the consequences. It is true that, in a more summarized way, as you see, Cloud does not go for the duvida lands, it gives you very specific answers to what you ask. Copilot doing his thing... There is. It doesn't start until I click on the window to respond. Failed. And here, GPT-4 is still writing its answer. But hey, it seems like a pretty good answer too. complete. It is true that the good thing about BART here is that has even given us some images that come to be resources that we can click on to go see more information about each of those blocks. But hey, GPT-4 has given a perfect answer, accompanied by BART, which also seems to me very very good. Let's see if Copilot finishes. You know, friends. Okay, Copilot just finished. Well, a pretty vague answer, things as they are. Here it is true that it seems to me that the response from GPT-4 and BART is a lot, much better than the one Copilot has given us. Four points that, well, it seems that he gave them to us to send us quickly. So the point is missing the point here, of course. Let's move on to the next question. Come on, a question to give us some practical advice. What are some effective strategies for manage time? This question, well in the end, It will help us to evaluate the capacity of each AI to offer practical advice and that we can then apply. Come on, let's go with ChatGPT, let's go with Copilot, Let's go with Cloud. And look, I like Copilot, but, damn, about him not starting to respond until We open the window, it seems like a big mistake to me, fat, fat, because we can't do several things at the same time. So, precisely, I'm going to the Copilot window so you don't have to wait. Well, I've already pasted the question on all of them. Here we are seeing him begin to respond. I also don't like that Copilot always says, Hello, this is Bing. You can say, hello, I'm Bing or something, but This is Bing. He has always said that from the beginning. Anyway, here we are seeing that he is already starting with the first recommendations. For example, prioritize your daily tasks. You can use the Eisenhower matrix method. Set realistic goals and deadlines. I agree. Eliminate distractions and create a conducive environment to work. Use tools for time management. Rest and take care of your health. Okay, there he is giving us an answer with, As you can see, multiple sources that cite us in the bottom. And well, it seems to be over. Well, let's see what we have done responding in this case to the rest of the options. Come on, let's go with Cloud. Cloud gives a fairly brief answer. Also like Copilot, establishes priorities and focus on what is most important, first. I agree. Use a calendar or agenda to schedule your activities, reduce distractions, avoid procrastination, take breaks, delegate, optimize your morning routine and prepare yourself last night. I do that and it is very useful. OK, Come on, let's go to Bart. Bart, the truth, an answer, well, pretty good too. He even says, There are some additional tips to manage the time effectively that we could apply. Places, Create an organized and free workspace of distractions. Use time management tools. Learn to say no to requests they are not important. Set realistic achievable goals and monitor your progress and make any necessary adjustments. In addition to, of course, the recommendations above. And let's go with GPT-4, which in this case, well, it has also given us a fantastic answer. The truth is that ChatGPT, In my opinion, it is the one that gives the best answers. At least for now, everything we have tried is the most precise. But well, here I believe that the four of them have accomplished moderately well. Come on, next question, We are finishing, I don't want to make the video not much longer either. I'm going to ask the four attendees here what are the emerging trends in technology for the year 2025. With this question, Well, one can get an idea of ​​how each platform handles projections and trend analysis. Come on, We return to Copilot, which seems the slowest, the one who needs a little bit of our help. Makes a search, Emerging trends in technology by 2025. Here, Those who connect to the internet have an advantage. The one who is at a disadvantage, let's say here, would be in any case Cloud, which can only give us answers based on the knowledge of him, they are blocked, as I have told you before. Here, Copilot is starting to give us five points, which at the end of the day says optimized production of artificial intelligence, long-range renewable energies, quantum computers, the elimination of CO2 from the air and biotechnology. Let's go with Cloud, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, augmented and virtual reality, I agree, autonomous vehicles, the internet of things and smart cities and improved connectivity. Very good answer, personally on the internet I agree with it. Here, what are the trends, what BART tells us, AI, internet of things and quantum computing. And other emerging trends, virtual reality increased bar, makes sense, metaverse and cybersecurity. Let's go with ChatGPT, has given us a response after making a quick search. Coexistence with robots, an increase is expected of the adoption of robots in domestic environments and personal, powered by artificial intelligence. That's very interesting, although I don't know, I see it as very close. Supervision, automated search, transportation intelligent, work with robots, increased creativity, consistent communication, symbiotic economy, rapid implementation of 5G, global digital government. Oh my gosh, it's true. The truth is that everything looks like ChatGPT has given perhaps the most complete answer of all. BART, surprisingly good. CompileOnAir and here Cloud, you should give even an extra because he has had, based on To his knowledge, I believe a very accurate answer. So point for Cloud. And the last question. This is a question that requires the use of internet connection to give us an answer exact. And it is the type of questions in which AIs Sometimes they tend to mix things up and fail. Let's put these four to the test a little. alternatives. I'm going to ask you who the president of Argentina is. You already know that there has been a change recently. We are going to demonstrate, as I say, here with this asks about the lack of internet, for example Cloud, in addition to checking if these assistants, to Despite searching for information on the Internet, they are capable of filtering them and giving us a correct answer. We go with GPT4, in ChatGPT, we go with Copilot and we go with Cloud and finally with BART. Come on, we're back to Copilot. Here Copilot does a quick search and says The president of Argentina is Javier Milei, an economist, politician and teacher who assumed the position on December 10, 2023. He was elected in the second round of elections, with 55% of the votes, defeating the candidate Peronist Sergio Massa. Here is the date when he took office I understand that will be correct. It sounds like it was in December but I don't know if It was December 10th. In any case he has given the correct name of the president and also who he defeated in the elections. ChatGPT says the current president is Javier Milei, was elected in the 2023 elections defeating Sergio Massa. Javier Milei represents the Freedom Party Keep it up. Cloud here obviously says that the president It is Alberto Fernández, something that is not correct. And BART says as of January 17, no, January 17 is when I'm recording the video but it is not from January 17, The president of Argentina is Javier Milei, He was elected in the general elections of October 12, 2023 defeating the candidate official Alberto Fernández. Here it screws up. Milei is a known far-right economy for his libertarian and anti-Semitic positions. Here what we are seeing is that indeed BART screws up. This is what I critic of BART, which I often do when I have searched for information, for example, about iPhones and such, I start to mix things and that which connects to the internet. So when I have to search on the internet I always trust more in this case from Compilot and ChatGPT. Well, I could continue doing many more tests but the video would practically last almost as long a movie. So I think that with these we can get already a slight idea that ChatGPT is still ahead of its competitors for quality from his answers, but above all because of the integration with GPTs, configurable, plugins and more, which are not I have tried here because if not, then yes, this It would be a feature film. Comppilot, for example, disappointed me for their slowness in responding. I understand that in part they are forcing him to force people to buy the subscription to Compilot Pro, but in any case I didn't expect it to work so bad in that aspect. Let's see, During all this time I have not felt that their answers are bad nor that they really was so slow. Until now that I have started to compare answers From both of them I have seen that it is always the slowest of all. Regarding VAR, hey, it works well in terms of speed and structure of your answers, but it is true which in my experience offers inaccurate data much more frequently than the rest, which means that I don't trust myself and as I told you before, I prefer to use alternatives like ChatGPT, Compilot or even Perplexity, which I told you about in a video a few weeks ago, when, for example, I have to do information searches and contrasting multiple sources. And lastly, Cloud, In my case I use it mainly for tasks writing that do not require connectivity, since it seems to me that he makes some very concise and very precise. I particularly, to give you a specific case, I use it to create titles and descriptions of my YouTube videos when I have any Doubt about their approach. In short, I think that what we can do best any of us is combine them, okay? Because in the end, why are you going to stay alone? with a? I believe that they all have good things and things bad and I think that the shortcomings of some They can cover other intelligences. Me, for example, for my daily workflow I'm combining precisely some things from one and for other things I use others. Cloud told you that I use it to suggest myself titles and descriptions based on the scripts that I see him counting. Then I use ChatGPT with a custom GPT that analyzes the different titles that I consider and then evaluates them for their possible potential. And Copilot sometimes I use it to generate texts for social networks and search on the internet. And then BART, Well, I don't use BART. I hope that when they improve it with Gemini it will be much better, but in my case I haven't been able to find it the profit. In any case, I have no doubt that in 2024 we are going to see a considerable improvement in these technologies since everything is advancing very fast and I think that this year particularly It is going to be the most important year in the implementation of artificial intelligence. Not only at the web level as we are seeing now, but also on our mobile devices such as the iPhone, whose rumors suggest that is going to have a significant improvement with the upcoming updates to their operating systems. Anyway, tell me in the comments how clever artificial seems better to you and I'm also interested in knowing how you use it, for what purposes. Anyway, For my part this is all. If you liked this almost movie about intelligence artificial you can leave your like, your subscription and nothing, see you very soon with more content here on La Manzana Mordida because You know, I am Fernando and I promise to do it. Ciao!
Info
Channel: La Manzana Mordida
Views: 40,580
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Comparativa IA 2024, ChatGPT vs Copilot, ChatGPT vs Bard, ChatGPT vs Claude, Copilot vs Bard, Copilot vs Claude, Bard vs Claude, mejor IA 2024, análisis IA 2024, ranking IA 2024, IA más avanzada 2024, ChatGPT 2024, Copilot 2024, Bard 2024, Claude 2024, comparación inteligencias artificiales, qué IA es mejor, IA ChatGPT, IA Copilot, IA Claude, IA más eficiente 2024, IA para programación, IA para escritura, IA para negocios, novedades en IA 2024, IA más popular 2024
Id: afbwct_rmSo
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 27min 48sec (1668 seconds)
Published: Tue Jan 23 2024
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.