Charter Schools: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: LastWeekTonight
Views: 11,606,687
Rating: 4.7740374 out of 5
Keywords: last week tonight with john oliver, last week tonight, john oliver, charter schools
Id: l_htSPGAY7I
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 18min 12sec (1092 seconds)
Published: Sun Aug 21 2016
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Story from Ohio I wish were mentioned that more people need to know:
A top representative in charge of Charter Schools in Ohio was caught faking test scores to improve the overall funding that Charter Schools receive. Essentially he tried to make Charter Schools look better by giving them higher than actual reported test scores. The representative's name is David Hansen. He did not get fired, but instead resigned from his position.
A large/poor city in Ohio, Youngstown, was the center of some controversy this past year as the state passed a bill (with very little public knowledge and very little time) that allows Ohio to appoint a private CEO to have complete power over the school district. The controversy of course coming from the school board losing all of their power to some private person appointed by the state. A large reason why this even happened is because David Hansen helped get that bill passed shortly before resigning.
John Kasich ran for president this past year as a member of the republican party. His campaign manager, Beth Hansen, is the wife of douchebag and "cheats on his state tests" David Hansen.
As a non-American it seems to me that everything in America is treated as a commodity. Things like education, healthcare and to a lesser extent elections. Is this something Americans just accept? Has it always been that way? Just seems a little strange to me but each to their own.
This is anecdotal but I went to a math and science Charter school for High School in Delaware it was one of the best schools around, people left privates schools to come. But the school was able to reject kids based on performance, one of the reasons it was so good. we had a 98 percent grad rate and the majority of kids went to college. It did create a great environment and culture for learning when all the kids were scholastically minded. I benefited from that kind of education vs a normal state education but i understand the experience is uneven for each school. with anything that is fast growing people will do spotty jobs to get in on something good. They need over site.
Charter schools game the system by weeding out students they don't want anymore. They have lower percentages of special ed kids (and actively recruit/keep those with disabilities that are more manageable to keep their number not too embarrassing), ELL kids, and students who struggle are shown the door. Then they gloat and claim they have better scores.
Multiple sources from the New York Times exposé of the Success Academy network in New York City: - http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/13/nyregion/success-academy-teacher-rips-up-student-paper.html?_r=0 / Discipline method at Success Academy by their "model teacher" - the video is disgusting - http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/nyregion/at-a-success-academy-charter-school-singling-out-pupils-who-have-got-to-go.html / Principals make list of kids who "have got to go"
Not too mention that they brain-drain public schools, leaving them with higher numbers of struggling students than before, the cash-drain public schools out of tax money, and they space-drain public schools out of buildings by forcing them to shrink, have higher class sizes to accommodate charters sharing a building with them.
For teachers, retention rate is atrocious compared to public schools. Teachers are overworked, often have no union or collective bargaining
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/07/nyregion/at-success-academy-charter-schools-polarizing-methods-and-superior-results.html
John; Please tell me you didn't open a charter school to make a point!
Edit: "Let's say i wanted to open the John Oliver Academy for Nervous boys..." NO. YOU DIDN'T!!
Edit 2.0: You, tease. Granted, it would have undermined the point you're trying to make so yeah; i understand :)
Off for another month??? They just got back...
I wouldn't mind a school named after Harambe....
An interesting piece to watch. But the main flaw is the lack of a comparison to public schools.
Yes, John shows that some charter schools are terrible. But some public schools are terrible too. Are charter schools actually worse on average than public schools?
That's the main question we should be asking. John didn't address that at all.
I was always pretty anti charter schools.
Public schools don't get enough funding but we are funding these schools which have littler oversight and have private interest.
You see some charter schools which are, arguably, not schools, but cater to athletics, such as football or basketball. Some charter schools are made just to have a football or basketball team of all-stars. I don't get why we are funding charter schools for "a better option" when the other option is being drained of resources because of charter schools.
Kids are literally being used as profit tools, and a lot of times success has a lot to do with funding, so in order to get funding, you pass every kid, regardless of if they learned anything. Making things up to continue to get funding is NOT an uncommon tactic in charter schools. Like you saw, attendance is one of them, success and graduates is another. With the oversight being private, you cannot safely assume these kids are actually learning anything.
Some charter schools are successful and done right and have the right goals. Many do not though.