Cavitation - Sonoluminescence - Implosion Technology - Sacred Sciences Part 3.mp4

so here we have the picture of the lily impeller or the pecs impeller next to some diagrams from Walter Russell from 1926 now we're going to take a look at the difference in efficiency of a propeller and impeller take a look at this video as something to exist that must be moving so every single thing in this universe is moving the interesting thing is that all of that movement in nature has a particular spiraling path nature never ever moves in a straight line no such thing so that is nature's streamlining principle gotta have a side note nothing ever travels in a straight line all things come from a rotating frame of reference and as Walter Russell put it all Direction is curved and all motion is spiral when I froze the Whirlpool that you see in your bathtub you pull the plug out there's the Whirlpool if you freeze that whirlpool it's exactly the same geometry as a hurricane or a tornado or any other spiral or cochlea of your ear this shape is archetypal in nature and so when I froze this I was then able to rotate it and create because I had a frozen whirlpool I was able to create a whirlpool so one of the first things that I used it on particularly in America there are great big holding tanks well that water gets stagnant the municipalities that manage that water have to put chlorine and chloramines into the water the problem is better solved by mixing that water generally throughout the world if you want to mix water it's very expensive I put one of these frozen whirlpools in the bottom of one of these tanks six inches high four inches wide and I rotated it with a couple of hundred watts of power couple of light bulbs of power and I found it was able to mix an entire tank of water ten million gallons which from an engineering point of view is not even conceivably possible so from there I started adapting these shapes into fans fans use 18% of the world's electrical energy they're not terribly efficient we found time and time again we could take the best fan in the world and reduce its energy by as much as 30% so pretty much everything in an industrial world can be improved by taking these shapes from nature and reconfiguring what engineers build today more order more power I can always have more order can always refine things more always have more geometry more nanoscopic textures can always have things working together to achieve a synergistic outcome listen to what that man said he said 200 watts can move 85 million pounds that's 10 million gallons of water so a helicopter blade in that water spending with 200 watts do you think that would achieve the same vortex the same amount of power no because it's only spinning on a 2d flat plane need to have three dimensions of spin so why not mount Tesla turbines or something like that inside of the industrial tank so as the vortex is being generated by that 200 watts the weight of that water is being funneled through some Tesla turbines and possibly generate some excess power while moving that amount of water here is Paul a la vía let's book called secrets of anti-gravity propulsion I liked the book overall especially chapter 10 dealing with Professor Searles technology and also he might have wanted to change the title from anti-gravity propulsion to anti-gravity impulsion because it seems that impellers are much more efficient than propellers and impulsion systems so this brings us to victor shall burgers implosion repulsing and the benefits from his device the weight reduction the air and water being sucked through helical grooves ordered grooves working collectively at tangential angles so there's a lot of stuff to look into this particular device and viktor schauberger in general here we see a propeller blade something like a ceiling fan propeller blades spin on a 2d flat plane the angles of the blades might be tilted a little bit but all in all the blade itself spins on a 2d flat plane the image on the lower right is the path that it traces while traveling in the air traveling through space the propeller spins and it traces that path like an Archimedes screw but the difference between a propeller and an Archimedes screw is that the screw is the actual shape that the propeller blade traces so the propeller blade just spins in 2d but it's traveling forward so the propeller traces that shape but the Archimedes screw is the actual shape so that's a main difference between a propeller and an impeller propeller spins in 2d impeller spins in 3d another big difference between a propeller and an impeller is that the propeller pushes outwardly and an impeller pushes inwardly it doesn't pull it doesn't attract or suck anything in it's pushed in the inverse direction through the impeller the inverse push and because it pushes inwardly it creates an inward vortex so you take a vortex you spin a vortex and you make another one if you take a propeller and you spin it it's being ejected outward radially all that energy and if you move forward you're going to trace a helical trajectory but if you actually form an object to a helix then you spin that it's going to be even more beneficial but even a archimedes screw is cylindrical but a vortex is more the shape of nature a logarithmic spiral things might trace a cylindrical path while spinning but nature itself is more of a 3d vortex shape and that's what we need to mimic is spinning 3d vortex shapes or having coils in cones rather than cylinders and see what happens there and we put that in a huge tank of water and there's our device and there's our competitors device and we do the job better well most flow is looked at as two-dimensional so if you've got a winged France tur let's say that's a wing you're looking at the flow going over the top and under the bottom you're not looking at the flow going this way so everything in nature has three dimensions most of our science is really dealing with two dimensions so most of our tools are as well so you can see the spiral here in the end it's a pretty familiar spiral you see in your Whirlpool and that's easily understood but it's two dimensions it's this dimension and this dimension but look we've got a third dimension and you can see it's changing in the third dimension that's very complicated I mean it's infinitely complicated if you think about it every living thing goes through a liquid phase in its development so it takes on the geometry of turbulence so every living thing on earth as these geometries built into it from the cochlear of your ear to the spacing between your teeth on the size of your teeth - even if I look at my finger the length of that in proportion to that bone in a proportion of that bone are the same proportions that you find in these spirals so it's everywhere wanted to mention one more thing before we change subjects regarding viktor schauberger we see his device here and we can compare that to a more modern unit called a dispersor and wanted to bring it back even further taking a look at this object which was uncovered from ancient Egypt in the Valley of the Nile I believe that this could be an impeller see that says the mysterious Egypt try lobed disk to me it looks just like an impeller and it just so happens it was uncovered in the Valley of the Nile where large amounts of water would need to be circulated and also compared the Egyptian piece to the first avrocar from 1958 now I also heard that Archimedes got his idea for the screw after he visited Egypt which is even more significant here are a couple picture comparisons of the differences between propulsion and impulsion a propeller impeller waste and efficiency big and small Yang and Yin so in the upper left we have the pecs impeller compared to a regular turbine and the lower left we have a regular diesel engine compared to Rafael more gatos myt engine or the mighty engine and on the right we have a comparison between a nuclear power plant and professor John Searles s e-g we'll get into that later so taking a look at the difference between waste heat and efficiency let's take a look at the difference between fire and ice or Edison and Tesla explosions and implosions I wanted to offer a couple of my perspectives on lightning and thunder I think thunder is the result of an implosion or the collapse of the atmosphere I was watching the lightning storms in the San Francisco area here on Thursday April 12th from quite a few hours was huge huge show got some cool shots on the camera and I was comparing the lightning and thunder to the sonoluminescence lightning is blue and violet fire is red and orange implosive energy seems to be blue and explosive energy seems to be red a loud pop is created from the violent implosion of a cavitation bubble and a bluish light is associated with that not a red light that I have seen Tesla's light bulb had a bluish hue Edison's rather the one that Edison improvised from Tesla glows red shuttle coming into an atmosphere has a hot streak trailing behind it from friction pushing its way through the atmosphere all the heat of a lightning bolt though is contained within the bolt just like all of the heat of the sonoluminescence is contained within the bubble you can swat at the bubble underwater and break it up and make a million little bubbles at which point the heat might be distributed throughout those little bubbles but all that heat is still contained within the bubbles the gunshots are explosions notice the red fire from the bullets takes gunpowder to create an explosive force which projects the bullet thus the term projectile but lightning is different I think something is impelling not propelling take a look at that picture of a volcano with the lightning around it as the volcano explodes and projects ash into the air it's charging the atmosphere and changing the pressure potential and there is such varying extreme pressures in a short amount of time it releases arcs of electricity so pay attention to the sound of an implosive bubble versus an explosive bang see if you can tell the difference listen to that pistol shrimp again I think the sound of a Tesla coil is different than the sound of an explosion I think we're hearing the atmosphere collapsing at given frequencies rather than a wave pushing through the atmosphere at a given frequency with a Tesla coil well if you blow up a balloon underwater and then quickly suck all the air back into your lungs the surrounding water will collapse to the point where the balloon just occupied that space but if you collapse the balloon fast enough the water will slap together from the collapse and that will cause a sound but it's the result of an implosion not an explosion the sound from an explosion will carry radiation with it sound from an implosion might not carry radiation because nothing is radiating it's a different dynamic to achieve sound other people might think thunder is an explosive sound but I do not think so now we're going to get into the more interesting aspects of this stuff the implications of controlled cavitation on the atomic level Hutchison's experiments professor John Searles technology address the solar system Einstein's fallacies ruse alien science and let's see what else we can do

Channel: TheLovesoul1

Views: 1,111,062

Rating: 4.3982768 out of 5

Keywords: cold fusion, nikola tesla, walter russell, russellian science, symphony of the universe, imposion physics, implosion tech

Id: Z8HO5DGZcM0

Length: 15min 9sec (909 seconds)

Published: Thu Apr 19 2012