Art II: Renaissance & Baroque 1400–1800, with Rick Steves

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
Thank you. Oh yeah. Oh, you're just all trying to get A's, alright. We'll all get A's. The great thing about learning about history and art is, the more you understand what you're gonna see before your trip, the more fun you're gonna have when you travel. So we are one third of the way through a three-hour look at the story of Europe, from the year 500 until 20th century, and now we're going to dedicate the next hour to part two, and that is the Renaissance and the Baroque era, roughly 1400 to 1800. And that's just a reminder that this is all very rough dates, this is very sweeping history, it's ridiculous to try to do anything in depth when you're covering 400 exciting years of history and art for our travel interest in one hour, but I just want to give you a handle on the very basics, in hopes that you can be inspired to perhaps drill-down little deeper, and learn more about this before your trip, because I promise you, when you understand what you're looking, at it all comes to life. Your trip to the Vatican to see Rafael's beautiful School of Athens really has meaning when you know, "why did he do this, who paid for it, what was their agenda?" Now when we think about the Renaissance, we are celebrating this return to the wonder of classical Rome and the classical world, the Greeks and the Romans. For nearly 1,000 years Europeans were sitting in the dark. They knew there was something great before them, but they're wondering, "when are we gonna come out of this cultural slumber?" It happened around 1400. And that's the time when you had all of this aesthetics of the classical world, the beauty of these statues from Greece and Rome. And now the Europeans are doing that, they are grappling with the challenges, they're stepping forward, they're actually going beyond where the great Romans and Greeks went. And it all started in Florence. It started in Florence for good reason. Florence was the most urban part of Europe at that time, that part of Italy. it was the most advanced, with banking and trade, it was the most literate. Florence was sitting — Italy was sitting on the rubble of ancient Rome, and it was painfully aware that they were great people here 1,000 years ago, and, "we're not doing much at all, let's get our act together." In Italy during this period you had no unified Italian state, you had city-states. And each of them were very proud, and people did stuff for their city. And, in Florence, you had this amazing coincidence of all sorts of great people living in the same generation. Now when you think of this, what I like to call the class of 1500, it is quite remarkable to think what was going on at this time, not just Florence, but all over European civilization. Here is just eight guys who probably — most of them probably knew each other, or knew of each other, or were like two degrees separated, or something like that. You've got Martin Luther starting the Reformation. You've got Columbus and the great explorers breaking out of that Euro-centric world, and establishing the fact that the world is round, and there's a lot of people out there. You got Machiavelli who is Mr. Machiavellian politics in Florence. We've got Albrecht Durer, on the far right, he was the first guy to a proud self portrait. Artists are really becoming important characters in this civilization. You've got Lorenzo the Magnificent, the Medici family paying for great art. You've got Leonardo da Vinci, the classic Renaissance genius. We've got Henry VIII who dissolved the monasteries, and sort of took the reins into his old hands — own hands in England, and you've got Michelangelo. All these guys, the class of 1500. Think about it. Albrecht Durer, look at that portrait there, that self-portrait. This is one guy who's quite impressed with himself. This is a painter, he's painting himself like an elite. In the Middle Ages artists were anonymous craftspeople, now they're becoming highly paid, they're becoming respectable they're in the inner court of the political leadership. This is a big change. we've got Martin Luther. Martin Luther decided, "enough of this other people translating the Bible for us, it should be able to be read by the parishioners." And Martin Luther risked his life to translate the Bible into the people's language. He wanted to give people an alternative way to get to heaven without going through Rome. Quite radical, quite problematic, and we'll learn more about him. Henry the Navigator, Vasco da Gama, Magellan, Columbus, Amerigo Vespucci, all these guys, same generation, opening up the world. Then Columbus sailed to the Americas, when Magellan sailed around the world, when Vasco da Gama sailed around Africa to get to the spice trade in India, suddenly the lock on trade between Europe and all the luxuries of the East was broken. It didn't go through Venice anymore, and the powerful states emerged on the Atlantic seaboard, and now we have an expensiveness, and that really shook things up in Europe. This monument is in Lisbon which, in its day, was one of the most important cities in Europe. And when you had the new — the new discoveries, and the Age of Discovery, and the Age of Colonization, you got this wealth just washing back into Europe. There's so much gold leaf they can just slather it over all the high altars. And this would have just been harvested from the new — the New World. And you've got great architectural innovations, and great art masterpieces, and again, Florence is the epicenter of all of this. When we look at this dome, this is the Duomo, the Cathedral of Florence. And we gotta understand, that is really the architectural kickoff for the Renaissance. Within a 10-minute walk of that dome, you can see much of the great art of the Renaissance. That dome itself symbolizes the spirit of the Renaissance. when the Florentines built the Gothic church, they didn't know how they were gonna finish it. They just knew it was not going to be another Gothic spire, it was going to be something more Renaissance, more Roman, it was going to be a dome but they didn't know how to make the dome yet. And they scrambled, and they found somebody, Brunelleschi, who could innovate this, and they capped that Gothic church with a Renaissance dome. This was the biggest dome built in Europe since the year 200, when they built the Pantheon. 1,200 years, they had not been able to build a dome bigger than the Pantheon, and now the Florentines did it. To give you an idea of how respected this dome was, later on when Michelangelo was hired to go to Rome and design the new St. Peter's Basilica, he said, "I can build a dome bigger but not more beautiful than the dome in my hometown," designed by Brunelleschi, the Duomo in Florence. That's the dome that inspired so many domes until today. And today you can go to the top of that dome as a visitor. When we look at the architecture of the Renaissance, we see geometry. Everything is balanced, everything is orderly, everything is symmetrical. Squares and circles, it all works out. They were so into the geometry that when you step into a great Renaissance church, what they want to show off is not frilly clouds and cupids, but the architectural lines themselves. You can see here, they've actually highlighted the lines by making them a different color than the rest of the wall. So you step in there and you think, "these people have their act together geometrically." Remember throughout the Middle Ages, art was okay if it was the house of God. Why would you be making frilly, silly, luxurious art if it wasn't for the glory of God? The most noble art form was architecture, the most noble building was the church, paintings, statues, windows, tapestries, were okay because they decorated the house of God. Statues were in the niches of churches. And you can psychoanalyze this as Europe is stepping away from the church. This is the humanism that is sweeping through Europe, starting with the Florentines. Here we have a church in Florence. And this is more Gothic, and these are buried deep in the church. This is a niche in the church. In the same church you have another niche, made later on, and here we see St. George, who is alert. He's reaching out of the church, he's still there, he's only legitimate because he's in the church, but boy he is ready to leap. He is ready to jump. And you can look at his face, you can look at his alertness, you can look at the way his toes are grabbing the edge. And then you have David by Donatello. David. This is the first male nude to be sculpted in Europe in a thousand years. This would have been disgusting a generation earlier, and now we are celebrating a classical nude, a Greek classical nude. David. It's a, it's a, it's a male nude, but it is a Bible story. David is still toying with the head of Goliath at his feet, so it's okay because it's religious. But this is art done for a rich person to decorate his garden. That's a big change. And that was an inspiration, and this is kind of the excitement of the Renaissance. It's dicey, it's very very dicey. Here Botticelli shows you Eve and Venus. It's the same person, isn't it. But the first one is Eve because it's still got to be a biblical character, and then later on you can take Eve and say" no, no, no, I'm just kidding, it was pre-Christian." This is really cool because the pre-Christian stuff is humanist, people can do it. You don't need to be humbled by the church. You've got the Three Graces in a ancient Roman fresco, and you've got the Three Graces in a Florentine Renaissance painting. The same inspiration. Now artists are mathematicians. Artists understand the laws of perspective, artists are scientists, they're botanists, they gotta know what they're painting so they can give you realism. Before, it was just symbolism. It was narrative, it was like comic book figures, now they want to show you the real thing. And they've got it organized so that it has a psychological impact. Here, Leonardo actually had a design for his Last Supper. Now when you look at this you don't think, "oh man isn't it amazing how the lines of perspective pull you right to Jesus," but subconsciously you feel those lines bringing you to the center piece, which of course is Jesus. And at the same time, there's something about that room that's not quite right mathematically. Leonardo didn't make a mistake, he wanted to create an otherworldly atmosphere at that table also, because this was not just any dinner, this was the Last Supper. So these are mathematical, scientific, geniuses that have an agenda, and this is coming through in the art. Now in order to be an artist, you have to have understood the mathematical laws of perspective. Ghiberti did the gates of the baptistry [Gates of Paradise], and here you can see this is the pride of Florence. They had a competition to decorate the gate of the baptistry, and all the leading artists of the generations submitted their, their, their samples of what they could do. And Ghiberti was given the gig, and for a generation he was the superstar artist of Florence, and he blessed the city with these incredible panels, there's a whole bunch of these panels. When we look at 'em, we see this is a mathematician. He is really passionate about showing believable three-dimensional depth on a flat two-dimensional surface. This is about a half an inch deep, but he's pulled out all the stops to make it feel very deep. Lookit, you've got arc — mathematically correct architectural backdrop, you've got tiles in the foreground that are mathematically correct, intentionally put there, you don't need tiles in the foreground but that gives you a sense that it's going deep. In the center you have a foreshortened bench, in the back there, that lets you know it's deep. You've got a foreground, a middle ground, and a background this is brilliant to show believable three-dimensionality. In a generation before that, nobody would have bothered, it didn't matter, but now they are so fanatic about showing depth. Mantegna painted this Jesus taken down off the cross, this deposition, foreshortened in an extreme way. Why would anybody do that? This is really tough, try to do this on a napkin next time in a restaurant, it's just really, really tough to make it work. And Mantegna is a Renaissance artist and he could handle, it he took the challenge and he did it. The paintings are evolving from this flowery, mystical, dreamy, Gothic style, with pointed arches, with gold leaf backgrounds, and with very unrealistic characters. Here we have — by the way this is an annunciation, and the angel is telling Mary she's gonna give birth to the Messiah. And just in case you don't know it, actually there's a line of sight here, and there's actually writing along the line, connecting the angel with Mary. And, you know, when you're seeing all of the different great paintings of this period, they all are telling a story, you always gotta remember who paid for this and what's the agenda here. Here we've got a High Gothic painting, and we can see two things happening at the same time. On the left you can see Adam and Eve getting kicked out of the Garden of Eden, and on the right you can see the Holy Spirit coming down, along with the angel, to tell Mary she's got, all of a sudden, a lot of importance coming down the road in her life, she's going to have to give birth to baby Jesus. When we look at the portico there, it's not a believable space. It's not important that it's mathematically correct, it's just wacky from an arithmetic point of view, but that's good enough. We see the columns and we see the roof, that's all they needed to do. If we look at Mary more carefully, we can understand that the artist has no interest in the anatomical correctness of her hands. I mean look at those hands, it's like somebody's wearing two left-handed rubber gloves, you know, when you have to wash dishes. It's just not right. But that's okay, there's five fingers there, those are human hands, and that's good enough. The art is evolving. This — on the left is a very early Gothic painting, and we see some attempt at depth. We can see Mary's foot stepping over the tabernacle, we can see the whole altarpiece there, trying to have substance, but we see the angels are just stacked on top of each other totem pole style. On the right we see a painting by Giotto, a more modern painter, and here Mary has more believable depth. The architecture of her throne is more believable, and we can see the angles are not stacked on top of each other like totem poles, but they get smaller as they get farther away, as would be reality. So artists now are trying to do this. Giotto is considered the first modern painter. In this fresco we see a scene from Giotto which is a vignette. It's cute, there's an animal, there's depth, there's rocks, there's an angel, it's a a real scene. There's actually a blue sky instead of a goldleaf sky, they're moving away from that gold leaf stuff. Remember who paid for it and why. This is a powerful crucifix done by Grunewald in Alsace in France. And this was paid for by a hospital where people were dying gruesome deaths from skin diseases. That was a common way to die in the Middle Ages, you had a skin disease and you just rotted to death. It was a horrible thing. And people would go to these hospice places, and they would just wait until they died. And they didn't have any painkiller, all they had was their faith and their belief that Jesus suffered, Jesus came to Earth to suffer and to be able to empathize with us, he knows what you're going through, have faith, you'll get through this, and ultimately be in heaven where everything's okay. So from a medieval frame of mind you look at this Jesus, Jesus actually has a skin disease himself here, to be more empathetic with the people in this hospital. We can see the death of Jesus. I mean, it's pulling the crossbar down. His elbows are pulled out of their sockets, his fingers are stiff in death, his feet are mashed by a bad job of hammering in the nail. This is really gripping, this is a powerful altarpiece designed for people who are in great suffering, that need to know their Savior suffered also. He's with you, you'll get through this. This is powerful medieval art, and it's important to know who paid for it and why. When we look at the art in the great churches in Florence, we can see the work of the Florentine masters, this is by Masaccio. And Masaccio was hired here to paint a chapel into a sanctuary, and look at the architectural depth there. It's just painted flat on the wall, but in a sense, you've got a whole new room in that church, it is so believable. And look at the pyramid of that the design there, that is designed for stability. You've got a pyramid of people, it's all symmetrical, it's balanced, it's mathematically correct, classic Renaissance by Masaccio. One of the great names of the Florentine Renaissance is Botticelli. I'm a sucker for Botticelli, I just love his work. And he is so excited about this opportunity to be more classical Greek, and classical Roman, and be free to paint from before the advent of Christianity in Europe, when they really had that humanism going on. And here we have the Birth of Venus, commonly called Venus on the Half Shell, and you'll see that in the Uffizi Gallery, in one room right next to the birth of spring — or the painting called Spring. And there's a whole room in the Uffizi Gallery filled with Botticelli masterpieces, and if you like Botticelli, if you like Florentine art, the Uffizi Gallery is the best collection of paintings anywhere in Europe. The three big names of the Renaissance: Leonardo, Michelangelo, and Raphael. Leonardo is your classic Renaissance genius. This is a self-portrait of Leonardo. And when you think about Leonardo's genius, it is broad. And that's kind of what a Renaissance man is, he's not just a poet, he's not just a philosopher, he's not just an engineer, he's all these things. If Leonardo was going to write his epitaph, it would probably read something like this, "here lies Leonardo, a great poet, philosopher engineer, man of letters, architect, sculptor, and I could paint pretty well also." I mean he just did it all, that's what you did. Michelangelo designed scaffolding to go to the top of the Sistine Chapel. Nobody'd ever done this, they said said it couldn't be done, he did it. Michelangelo built a road to get up to the best marble, in Carrara, nobody else could do it. Michelangelo designed the road. Florence was under attack, the city of Florence hired Michelangelo to design their fortifications. Michelangelo did his sculpture, the Pietà, and David. And the Pope wanted him to paint, so he went down to Rome and he did the Sistine Chapel. I mean, it's amazing. "Oh yeah, you're not dead yet, why don't you design the dome," so he did the dome of St. Peter's. He did it all. These guys were amazing. Now when you think about Leonardo, you're thinking of his Mona Lisa, his most famous painting, you'll see that in the Louvre. Here we have visually sort of the quintessence of the Renaissance. Stable, squat. Her hands are there to give a base. She's a triangle. She's even tilted back a little bit so she doesn't wobble. She is a model of composure, she's subtle, and you've got this mysterious background. You've got this background. Leonardo didn't want to be so simplistic to have a tree lined road going to a vanishing point, Leonardo took it one step further in the way he showed depth. He wanted to show depth, he wanted to be this realism, He did it by analyzing what happens to color as it gets farther away from your eye It sort of mellows out as it gets further, you know, when you look at a zoom lens kind of painting — or a zoom lens shot, you can see the color changes, its muted in the distance. Leonardo's dreamy landscapes show depth that way in a classic sort of Leonardo trick. Leonardo was very cerebral about his art. Everything was organized. I mean here we have a painting by Leonardo, and he would've had it all figured out this way. When we look at it we don't see that, but you can see the circle created by the semicircular top. If you dropped it down, it would fit in the box of the rest of the painting perfectly. If you look at everybody's gaze, everybody in that painting is looking at the same point, underlined by a finger. So that gives a cohesiveness there. And when you look at that painting, you're oblivious to it. But the point is, the Renaissance master knew about that, he intended that, and he made it happen. Here we have another Madonna and Child, we see that pyramid, we see symmetry, two columns on both sides, always symmetrical, and we see Leonardo's dreamy landscape. Leonardo did the Last Supper. Now when a genius like Leonardo is hired to do the Last Supper, he doesn't just do the Last Supper. It's not just 12 guys having dinner with Jesus. It is some sort of agenda for the patron. What do you want to show? And the man who paid for this wanted to show the exciting moment when Jesus said, "one of you will betray me," and everybody got excited and said, "Lord is it I?" It's that "Lord is it I," moment that Leonardo is capturing here. When you know that, as the visitor, then you look at this differently, and you can see the energy, and the excitement, and the mastery of realism that Leonardo gets across. Of course, Leonardo was a very experimental kind of guy, he didn't want to just do the slam-dunk obvious, and he was innovating all the time, so this is a fresco. Remember fresco is different than a painting. Tith the fresco, you draw a cartoon on the wall, you mix the pigment into the wet plaster, and you apply the plaster to the wall within the cartoon you drew. You've got to be fast, you've got to be accurate, because when it's dry you're stuck with it, and it's very durable when it's done. Leonardo's Last Supper, a fresco. Michelangelo's Sistine ceiling, a fresco Now Leonardo did an experimental fresco here with the Last Supper, and the wall absorbed moisture in a way he didn't anticipate, and today it looks pretty, pretty bad. And it was looking bad pretty soon after Leonardo did that, and that's just a consequence of his adventurous spirit. Michelangelo is a different kind of artist. Michelangelo was the first crazed artist. He was just so into it, and he would pick his favorite marble, and for him it was all about realism. You didn't want to show that paper mache medieval pietà with a dead Jesus looking like it's not even a real body, you have to have a real body, and a dead body. Again, what's the purpose of this? You're not just doing a pietà, there's Mary and Jesus, Jesus died for our sins. This is a dead Christ, he's been killed. He'll rise again and everything will be alright, but right now Mary is sitting with the body of her dead son, who's just been crucified, on her lap. That's got to get across by showing that this is a believable body. And we've got Mary looking younger than she should be because that's the eternal youth of the Virgin, you've got Jesus with his beautiful body, his believable body. Obviously Michelangelo has dissected because he knows what's under the skin. It was dangerous to dissect back then, it wasn't allowed. People — artists did it on the sly. And if Michelangelo saw another hotshot artists from another town who was supposed to be really good, take one look at of art — at his art, and he'd say, "You've dissected haven't you? I know you've dissected because you got that body right." Here we see Jesus, his dead body on Mary, and you've got a stone body, you want it to be flesh. How do you make the flesh more fleshy when it's really stone? Contrast. Contrast is really important. How do you make a group really happy with a wonderful hotel? Give 'em a lousy one just before it. Contrast, okay. Now when it comes to art, you've got this intentionally coarse robe of Mary, don't you, accentuating the beautiful fleshy body of Jesus. The deadweight, you see Mary's hand under Jesus' arm, you see the weight of his body, actually her fingers are pushing into his rib cage because he's so heavy. This is so powerful, and to stand there in St. Peter's Basilica and look into the eyes of Mary holding the crucified Christ as a Catholic, understanding the importance of Mary in the Catholic faith, it's magnificent, it's powerful. And it's our challenge to understand and accept the context of this art. What's it all about? Why was this such a big deal? Why is it in the most important Church in Christendom? Because Jesus is gone Mary's holding the body, and Mary is our intercessor, Mary's gonna take care of us. It's a beautiful, beautiful thing. A few years later, Michelangelo sculpted David. Now when we think about David — when we think about Michelangelo and we think about Leonardo, these are two great Renaissance artists, but two quite different artists. Leonardo thought the most noble thing is to paint. Leonardo would paint, and he would create from nothing, I mean it's quite impressive, he was quite a popular dandy, a legend in his own time, very well-paid, and he would paint, and then at six o'clock he'd wash up and go to some fancy gathering at the Medici's house, you know. Michelangelo, on the other side, he said "no, Leonardo you got it all wrong, we are not divine ourselves, we don't create, it is most noble for us to be a servant of God. We will reveal the beauty God put into the stone, that's why I would rather sculpt than to paint. I want to reveal God's beauty." And Michelangelo would get passionate with a piece of marble. He'd chip away at it like mad. When he was inspired he would even have a little beanie with a candle on his head so he could chip away at night. He was the first crazed artist. And when you look at, for instance, the Pietà, I mean think of a — it sounds a little bit like, "yeah, c'mon, really," but think of a 25-year old you know, and give him a chisel and a piece of marble and say "reveal." Michelangelo must have been inspired because he was passionate about knowing the Pietà was inside of that marble, "and I'm going to chip away the excess and show it." I'm going to take that big hunk of marble, and I know there's a beautiful David inside, and I'm gonna reveal it." When we look at David, I think we're looking at the visual embodiment of the Renaissance. I love thinking about David. It was paid for by Florence to be the symbol of Florence, as it was struggling against its bully city-state neighbors. And what's the deal? The good mascot for Florence is David, not because David was a brute, but because David was on God's side. David was a thinking individual who had faith in God, and it wasn't David, the little boy, that slayed the giant, it was God working through David that slayed the giant. And when you look at this statue, a lot of people say that hand, that right hand is just too big, what's going on with Michelangelo? He didn't mess up, that's intentional. This is the hand of God, and it was the hand of God that slayed the giant, and it was the hand of God that made sure Florence triumphed over Bologna, and Pisa, and Genoa, and all those other Italian city-states. When we look into the eyes of David, I believe we're looking into the eyes of Renaissance man. And for me, this is really sizing up the darkness of the medieval superstitious world. Again, this is humanism. Humanism, in a Italian Renaissance sense, is not a repudiation of God. I think it's just an understanding that the best way to glorify God is not to bow down in church all day long, but it's to recognize the talents that God blesses you with, and then get out there and use them. And that's what the Renaissance Florentines were doing. They were doing this for the glory of God, but they were doing it in a humanist spirit, they could tackle their challenges, and they could overcome. And Florence would really succeed. This is just so exciting when you get into that, and when you get into that in your travels, as you visit all of these palaces, and galleries, and museums, they take on more meaning. It's important when we're traveling and looking at things done in the 1400 and 1500 to realize that they were awestruck. Wonder- struck by what happened 1,500 years ago in Ancient Roman times, and 2,000 years ago during the Greek Golden Age. And they would actually know about these statues from the ancient writings, but they would be lost, and they would just be looking at sketches of these things, and descriptions of them, and then they would find them. The Torso Belvedere, or the Laocoon, these are great statues that you'll find in the Vatican today. These kind of statues were uncovered during the careers of Michelangelo, Leonardo, and Raphael, and they would run down to wherever they were excavated and sketch them, and be inspired at them. These are two 2,000 year old inspirations, and from those, look at the musculature there, the artist of the Renaissance would be inspired, and they would bring us their Renaissance art. A lot of Michelangelo's art is unfinished, and nobody knows exactly why. Very well could have been that his patrons would die, or get sidetracked, and money would dry up, and priorities would change, and he'd be called over here to do that, or over here to do that. Or maybe Michelangelo the genius was just satisfied. He's revealing the body that was in there, he's not gonna hang around to polish it, that takes a lot of time, let's get on to something else. Whatever the case, you'll see a lot of unfinished works by Michelangelo. In fact at the Accademia in Florence they there's a whole hall of them that lead right up to David. It's sort of to me like a temple of humanism, and at the high altar of humanism you've got David, declaring that we're moving into the modern world, the Renaissance in Florence. Michelangelo loved the musculature of the body. He wasn't great with women's bodies, but he loved the body. It's like a woman's body for Michelangelo, to me it seems like it's a man's body with coconut shells, you know, I mean it's just — Michelangelo's favorite thing to do was to go up to the quarry pits up, in Carrara where the best marble in the world was, and he would sketch the muscular, rippling bodies of those quarry workers, and he would be inspired, and he would come back and make those kinds of statues. Now when you think about seeing Michelangelo's finished work, you can see almost all of it in Rome, Florence, and Milano. There's great art by Michelangelo in Florence and well in Milan and Rome, but in Florence be sure to go to the Museum of the Cathedral, behind the cathedral, and there you'll see an underrated and just beautiful piece of work by Michelangelo. This pietà which has Nicodemus on the top. And Nicodemus has the features of Michelangelo himself in his old age, and it's just a powerful self-portrait as he's looking down on what maybe is one of his last works of art. Again, think of the intent of the artists here. Jesus — this is the deposition, Jesus' body being taken down off the cross. Again, Jesus has been killed, Jesus has died, you can't have a resurrection without the death first, and you want to emphasize the death. And look at the weight of Jesus's body pulling down. Look at how tall Jesus is, Jesus is unrealistically tall, if he was to stand up. You've got that zigzag of his body giving you that weight coming down, and that was all calculated by Michelangelo to give you the power of that particular pieta — pietà, and that is what distinguishes a Renaissance genius just from another artist. Now Michelangelo really like to be in Florence doing statues. But when the Pope says, "come to Rome and do a painting," Michelangelo really has no choice. So he goes down to Rome, and he spent years on his back doing the fresco of the Sistine Chapel, the ceiling, and much later he's called back again to do the big wall behind the altar, the Last Judgment. Two very different works of art, one done around 1510 I believe, and the other done around 1540, okay. The ceiling is humanism. It is the story of creation. It is God giving Adam the spark of life, and right from the very beginning Adam is quite an impressive character. We look at Adam there and we go, "wow, he is made in God's image." This is a humanist look at Creation, and that is in keeping with the Renaissance sort of aesthetic. When we think about David and — I mean Adam — and the stature he gets right from that moment he gets the spark of life, it just all fits in with what we're talking about. And when we look more at the different scenes on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, showing Genesis and the whole Creation, we can psychoanalyze it further. For instance, here we have the dramatic expulsion. Adam and Eve disobeyed, they tried the apple, and now they're getting kicked out of the garden. If we look at this historically, we've seen the same theme again, and again, and again. In the Middle Ages when Adam and Eve eat the apple, they are puny worthless creatures. And it's almost like worms on the sidewalk after a rainstorm, and God comes in and just sweep them out into the wilderness and there's no more Garden of Eden for them, okay. That's a medieval look at it. In the early Renaissance, on the left, you see a Masaccio, an early Renaissance Florentine painter, and we can see the weight, and the emotion, and the believable light source, and the heartbreak of being kicked out of the Garden of Eden. And that's early Renaissance. High Renaissance, we can look at Michelangelo's depiction of Adam and Eve getting kicked out of the garden, and it's almost like Adam's saying, "come on Eve, we'll go, we screwed up, I'm sorry, we'll be okay on our own," okay. That's that confidence of the Renaissance man, even getting kicked out of the Garden of Eden, you're gonna make it, you're gonna make it. Now 30 years later, it's a whole different story. The Reformation has happened. Rome has been sacked by the Catholic army of Spain. The Roman Catholic Church has been split. It's been a horrible couple of decades, and the church is coming out swinging. This is the Counter-Reformation. And Michelangelo is asked to paint the Last Judgment. And the Last Judgment is a scary thing, I mean here we have a vindictive Christ coming down on Judgment Day, his fist is raised. Mary is cowering under him. I mean, you know, normally Mary will go, "can't you go easy on these people?" No. Mary can't even get in a word edgewise here. Jesus is coming down, there's people who are going to heaven, and there are people who screwed up. And if you're a Protestant, God help you, because you're kicking off a miserable eternity in hell. Michelangelo's last great work was the dome of St. Peter's Basilica. Michelangelo took the job knowing he would never live to see it completed, and he took the job on three conditions. Number one, that he would have an army of workers to get as much of it done in his lifetime as possible. Number two, that he would not be paid. He wanted this to be a mark of his devotion to the church. And number three, that the dome would cap a Greek cross church. A Greek cross is like a plus sign, right, equidistant arms, as opposed to a Latin cross, was like a crucifixion cross with a long stem. Why was that such a big deal? Because Michelangelo is a humanist, and he wants the church to be a positive place. Man is made in God's image. A Greek cross is contained in a perfect circle, it's all very positive, whereas a Latin cross is more "hellfire and brimstone." So there's that philosophical point, and then there's also the point of if you have a glorious dome and you have a long normal west portal and nave, the portal will obliterate the grandeur of the dome, because you — it comes out too far and you can hardly see the dome. And with a shorter nave, you get the glory of the dome. This is Michelangelo's dome here looked at from a window in the Sistine Chapel — or a window in the Vatican Museum, and you can see what a glorious design it is. Taller than a football field on end, the tallest dome in Europe. You can go to the top for wonderful views. But when you look at it from St. Peter's Square you have this big baroque facade obliterating the view when you stand just in front of the church. You don't even see the dome. And that really frustrates the architect. Now the church was gonna go along with this Greek cross plan until the Baroque Age comes in. With the Baroque Age which follows the Renaissance, everything is more theatrical and you got a cast of thousands, and you need capacity to have more people in the church, so what do they do? They say, "well here's a fix, we'll just double the nave, who needs that Greek cross we'll make a Latin cross, then twice as many people can go inside on Christmas Eve for the mass," you see. Well that's handy but it messes up Michelangelo's vision for the church. Still, when you stand on the square and when you climb that dome, you get a good appreciation for Michelangelo's genius as an architect, as well as a painter and sculptor, a Renaissance genius. Raphael is the third of the big three, and Raphael is considered the synthesis of the grace of Michael — the grace of Leonardo and the power of Michelangelo. When we look at Raphael's work it is very balanced, it is sort of uber Renaissance. Again, you've got these triangles, you've got that stability, you've got the symmetry, even if you have five people in this holy family, you've got — with St. John the Baptist — you've got a tangle of bodies making a pyramid, you even got the clouds that are symmetrical, the clouds fall into order, one on either side, so everything is balanced and looking in a good Renaissance way. The Pope hired Raphael to paint the library of the pope in the Vatican in a celebration of Greek and Roman pre-Christian philosophers. This is mind-blowing, this is radical, that's what people were getting locked up for and run out of town in the old days, and now the Pope has hired Raphael to celebrate Socrates and Plato. I mean you got — this is called the School of Athens. And what's really exciting about the School of Athens, it shows St. Peter — the new St. Peter's Basilica under construction, because it was happening at the same time. And it has all the greatest stars of the Greek Golden Age, portrayed by the superstars of the art world of Raphael's generation, they're playing the roles. So when you look at Plato and Aristotle, Plato, on the left, is actually Leonardo da Vinci. Raphael made sure to include Michelangelo in the School of Athens. You got Euclid down there doing the design, and playing Euclid is Bramante, the engineer that did a lot to design the dome of St. Peter's. And in the background, just peeking around the corner from that pillar, is a self-portrait of the artist, Rafael himself. It's so exciting to look into these paintings and understand what's going on. So remember, this is Europe in the 1500s. And you've got big families running things, you got the Ottoman Empire still on the scene, you have no Germany but you do have the Holy Roman Empire, which is a loose confederation of German states. You've got no Italy but you have the Pope being a big shot politically. During this period the Pope was called the Pope King. And you've got Venice running a trading empire that stretches all the way to Crete and beyond. When Raphael dies in 1520, the Reformation — or the Renaissance, heads up to Venice. Started in Florence, the Pope bought it down to Rome to do all that renovation, the big three are gone, 1520, and it emerges, or it carries on up in Venice, where there's just lots of money. Remember Venice is a city of fabulously rich merchants, and they have their own ethics and their own values, and they hire the best artists of the day to make them feel good about their materialistic values. You got a painting like this. This is Danae, and the Shower of Gold, and this is by Titian. Titian was the greatest Venetian painter. You can remember him, Titian the Venetian, cranked out about one painting a month for 60 years. You're going to see a lot of Titians when you travel. And Titian was earning his living, and a very good living, by making these big shots in Venice happy by painting art that made rich people feel good about their materialistic values. Here we have a voluptuous woman reclining, no more symmetry, reclining sloppily, and sexily on a messy bed, and money, gold, falling down from the heavens, just blessing this rich guy. You've got art that, like this is called Venus and the Organ Player, showing the tension between culture and hedonism, as this merchant leers at this voluptuous woman while keeping both hands on his organ. This is just such, it's such powerful art, and it is soaked in keeping with the values of the rich people that were paying for it in Venice. In the North you've got the Northern Renaissance. Now the Northern Renaissance is not a renaissance in the true sense of the word, it is a growth out of the Gothic Period funded by lots of money. It wasn't going back to the greatness of Classical Rome, it was just lots of money and lots of interest in art. And here we have a bunch of merchants, a bunch of city big shots in the Netherlands with the world, and open — closing a deal. It's just that sort of values. You've got guilds, you've got lots of money, this is on the main square in Belgium, and you've got art that is really excited about details, lots of details, tiny details. This is a Descent From the Cross by van der Weyden, paid for by the archery guild. And lookit, Jesus almost looks like a crossbow there, doesn't he. It is so much fun to know who paid for the art and what do they have in it for them. There's a playful attention to detail, this is the Arnolfini Wedding Portrait, classical, classic sort of values in the North, you have a rich merchant and his bride, all sorts of symbolism. She looks pregnant, I don't think she was pregnant, it was just the style to make her dress like she was pregnant to make it more likely that she would be fertile and that they would have a child, at least that's what they told their parents. There's a dog at her feet symbolizing fidelity, Fido. There's ripe fruit on the windowsill symbolizing fertility. In the back there's a whisk broom hanging on the wall, maybe symbolizing what the position of the woman is after the wedding. And if you look in the very back, the round mirror. In the old days you didn't have the technology to make a big mirror so you made a round mirror that bowed out and collected more images. If you look carefully at that you can actually see the bride and the groom from behind, and the artist himself painting the scene. It's just playful attention to detail, symbolic of that fun-loving detail you find in Northern European art during the Northern Renaissance. Art up here is sort of folky, it doesn't have heavy-duty Christian spiritual messages, it's got folk wisdom. Here we have sort of a peasant's wedding dance, and everybody's dancing around the bagpipe. Bagpipes are symbolic of hedonism there, and the churches in the background being ignored. So there is a little message there, but it's kind of playful and fun. The art by masters like Peter Bruegel showed slice of life in the Netherlands. Here we have a hundred different games children play in the streets, or 40 different games people play in the streets. And if you look at each one of them it's a little vignette, a fun little intimate look at life back then, centuries ago in the Netherlands. This is a triptych, a three-panel altarpiece, done by a guy named Hieronymus Bosch. This is called the Garden of Delights. And here we have a typical preachy altarpiece. On the left we have Creation. God creating Adam and Eve, a luscious garden, everything is peaceful and good. In the center, we have hedonism gone wild. All of these decadent people in bubbles, in fruit pies, having all sorts of sexy things going on, chasing misguided values, and that ends up in hell on the right, and that's where we got the dues you pay from all of these earthly pleasures. You can see here all of the earthly pleasures, and then when you go to the third panel, you see your hellish result. Here we have a self-portrait of the artist Bosh, wearing your typical nightmarish hat with the bagpipe symbolizing hedonism, with birds leading naked people around the bri, the artist with your broken eggshell body, and tree trunk legs, crashing through dinghies on a frozen sea. Bosch was really a trip, I'll tell you. And you can look at Bosch for hours, and you can see his great art, a lot of it in Spain, in the Prado, the greatest collection of paintings I think anywhere in Europe, because back then it was called the Spanish Netherlands, and the king of Spain ruled it and he got all the best art, consequently it ends up in their museum hundreds of years later. In Germany you got Albrecht Durer. And Albrecht Durer, this is another self portrait of this guy, he just was quite a self-respecting dandy, and he insisted on being well-known, on putting his initials on every painting so people could see it, and along with attention to detail, he was famous for being the first mass-produced painter, because he was a master of the woodcut. And you would paint on a piece of wood, and then you would chip away all the wood that was showing, apart from the sketch that you did, and then you would dip that in the ink, and you stamp it out, and you would produce all of these paintings. And now people could afford to have an Albrecht Durer in their house, because they printed up like mad. And at the bottom you have AD, Albrecht Durer, reminding you who made this piece of art. In the same generation as Michelangelo in Florence, you've got Michelangelo style, Michelangelo quality, wood carvers in Germany. You'll see some of the very best wood carving when you go to Rothenburg in the church there by Riemenschneider, from about the year 1504. Now during this period, you've got all sorts of corruption in the church. You've got the church running around, trying to pay for all that art with the new Basilica at the Vatican, that was not cheap. You got an army of people working on this thing, and you've said all of your tithe collectors to the far reaches of the Roman Catholic world, saying, "as soon as you drop a coin in the bucket your loved one's soul will be spring free from purgatory," selling indulgences, selling church offices, just really disgusting Christians up there that didn't understand why giving money to this corrupt guy would help you get to heaven quicker. And that was causing a problem, and that was causing a lot of people to chafe at the bits. I want to remind you, during this period the church was really really powerful. They were the biggest landowner in Europe, the church officials — when people die you'd will your land to the church or the monasteries, so that you would have people praying for you to get through purgatory. The only people that could thumb their noses at secular laws of all the petty little kings and dukes in Germany, were the church officials, because they had a higher law from Rome. 10% of all your wealth would go to Rome in the form of tithes. There were so many reasons for the petty little political leaders of Germany to jump on the Reformation bandwagon, they just needed somebody to give them permission to overthrow the power of the church, take all that land keep all that money, and still be Christian, so you could go to Rome without going through — so you could go to heaven without going through Rome. And remember, during this period the abbeys and the monasteries and the church controlled knowledge. If you've seen the movie or read the book, Name of The Rose, you get a very vivid image of that. And I was just in a monastery in Prague where they had a cage above the library, called "Libri Prohibiti," the prohibited books. And these were the books that you had to get the key from the abbot to actually get your hands on and read. And this is a period when none of the Bible or the sacred writings could be translated into the vernacular languages so regular people could learn them, they were only in Latin because that kept him away from the unwashed masses, and then the priesthood would interpret that to the people. And that's one that way the church was keeping its grips on a knowledge, on land, on power, and it was just really ripe for a change, and here comes this troublemaking monk in Germany, who is a professor in a little town up in the North called Wittenberg, and he just didn't understand it all. He marched all the way as a loyal pilgrim, a faithful pilgrim, all the way down to Rome, he climbed the Scala Santa, the sacred stairs, on his knees, he got to the top and he just said, "I still don't get it, I don't know what's all this, you know, paying for forgiveness, and so on." He went back and he hammered 95 points he wanted to discuss on the door. And that was not allowable and he had to take refuge, and he hit out, protected by a German Prince. At that time he wrote- -he translated the Bible into German, which made things even worse for him and it opened up this crazy time called the Reformation Wars. Europe was embroiled in a 100 years of fighting. By the end of the Reformation Wars, 1648, with the Peace of Westphalia at the end of the Thirty Years' War, they decided it was religious freedom. Now that wasn't religious freedom like we know it, it was every king gets to decide what religion his people will be. That was religious freedom. And the line between loyal to Rome and Protestant, is remarkably close to the line between the Roman Empire and barbarian, okay. North of that Roman line, that's where the Protestant church was. I find that quite thought provoking. Now Martin Luther could not have succeeded, guys before him got burned at the stake, but Martin Luther was along the same time as Gutenberg, when you could print stuff up economically. And you could print your ideas up, and you can hand out these little brochures, and leaflets, and booklets, and everybody could get on board with you. And Martin Luther would have been burned also, had it not been for a number of things, but one of them was the Gutenberg Printing Press. After Martin Luther opened up this can of worms, every Protestant Reformer got to carve his own way to hell, that's what they would say. And you had Knox up in Scotland, and you had Calvin, and you had all sorts of reformers packing the churches out, taking Europe by storm, and in a couple of years in 1517, we're going to have the 500th anniversary of the Reformation, 1517, 2017. That's going to be a big deal in Germany. One thing the Reformation did was also overcome the lock of the church. Henry VIII was in on this. He dissolved — he did the dissolution of the monasteries. When you travel around England you'll see all these destroyed monasteries, all of them destroyed in the 1500's when Henry VIII decided to ruin the power of the monasteries and take the power himself, making the people Protestant Christians instead of Roman Catholic Christians. Every time there's chaos in the church, you've got people whitewashing the other people's art. Just like what's going on the Muslim world today, iconoclasm. You see a pre-Christian Catholic church, suddenly it's a Lutheran church or a Protestant church, and everything is whitewashed. And all behind that white wash is Catholic painting. This is the church in Harlem, and if you look at the column on the right, you see a patch that is revealed from when it was all painted that way. And instead of all sorts of glorious statues and paintings about Mary and the Saints, instead you got a giant pipe organ, as the focus now is more on the pulpit and on music. Great front and center pulpits and glorious pipe organs. Iconoclasm. All through your travels you're going to see beautiful art defaced by people who disagree with that religion. You see it in the Ancient World, you see it in more modern times, iconoclasm. It's so sad to see beautiful paintings with their faces crossed out, or their noses broken off, or whatever. That's all part of that iconoclasm. Now the church wasn't going to take this laying down, they responded with the Inquisition and the Counter-Reformation. The Inquisition palace is in Spain. Spain was the powerful army, the biggest, most important defender of the Roman Catholic Church during the Reformation, and the center of all that was the big palace outside of Madrid, El Escorial. El Escorial. You can see that, it's the only building built in that generation in Spain it was such a big project, and from there, a lot of the Counter-Reformation was run. I mentioned, in the Sistine Chapel the front painting was done by Michelangelo after the Reformation, and this is that sort of Judgment Day Counter-Reformation art. All over Catholic Europe you'll find paintings in the churches showing angels coming down, grabbing the scriptures that have been translated into the local language, and then torching those scriptures, that's not allowed, that'll get you in big big trouble. Finally after all that killing, it's called the First World War in a lot of ways because every nation was embroiled in it, Europe was exhausted. And it was mostly fought on German soil because Germany was fragmented, and it was just convenient to fight the battles there. A third of Germany was dead. it was just a horrible slaughter, and finally they just said, "let's just go to church and worship whatever way they tell us." And if a king was Protestant that was gonna be it, and if a king was Catholic that was going to be it. You stepped into church and you get this pro status quo art. You just gaze up at the ceiling, and it opens up into heaven, and you get Baroque. Baroque is art for the church, and Baroque is art for the divine monarchs, and Baroque is pro status quo art. Baroque follows the Renaissance. When we think about Baroque, it was born in Rome. And this is the Vatican, and that's the arm of the Counter-Reformation. Bernini was the first great artists of the Baroque Age, and Bernini designed the Piazza San Pedro, which is the symbolic outstretched arms of the church to welcome the people in to that protective circle. When we go into the St. Peter's Basilica, we see the glory of that Baroque spot, and we also find all over Rome, in churches, this new theatrical art. You've actually got angels pulling open the curtains, and people are tumbling out, and it's just like onstage art. And it's just over the top, it's emotional, a wonderful sort of change after the cerebral Renaissance. Now we have emotional art, we have pro status quo art, we have art that just says follow the church or follow the king, and let's stop fighting. Now in order to impress upon people in the interest of the Church and in the interest of the divine monarch, you gotta control nature. In a beautiful way, to have that energy, and that exuberance, and to control nature, is to have a fountain. And a fountain would be a very popular tool in Baroque art. And you've got beautiful fountains like this one of the Four Rivers, that is on Piazza Navona, by Bernini. When we think of Baroque art, it's gonna grab an exciting moment. Here we have three different portrayals of David slaying the giant. Early Renaissance, it's this wonderful, elegant study in a classical nude, Donatello. High Renaissance, humanism. David is sizing up the giant, and he's gonna, he's gonna take him with the help of God. Baroque, now it's actually an action. That stone is about to fly. See in Baroque they're gonna capture the action. In Renaissance it's going to be composed and thoughtful. I've got my sling, I've got the hand of God, I've got my rock, I've got my enemy, we're gonna do this. Baroque, it's much more action. A perfect example of a Baroque theme would be this wonderful statute by Bernini in the Galleria Borghese in Rome, one of my favorite buildings in all of Europe because it's filled with masterpieces by Bernini, the father of the Baroque movement. These statues are just breathtaking. And this one, this is Apollo chasing Daphne. And Bernini has captured just the exciting moment in the mythological story when Apollo is running after Daphne, he's just about to jump on her, he's got all sorts of exciting ideas, he can hardly wait, and in at that very moment Daphne is turning into a tree. Branches are sprouting from her fingers, roots are sprouting from her toes, and Apollo is in for one rude surprise. It's that split second that Bernini is capturing here in Apollo chasing Daphne, and that is classic, classic Baroque. Don't miss that when you're in Rome. Baroque cannot stand a simple straight line, Baroque wants to decorate it over the top. Architecture would be all glittered and gussied up, you've got lots of 3D, you'll find a painting and then you'll have a stucco leg from the painting actually coming down over the cornice. You'll have, in this church in Rome, an actual false dome. If you sit in the right spot in the nave it looks like the dome's real, but when you walk right under it, you can see it's just painted on a flat roof. That would be just a classic baroque sort of thing. Remember Baroque is political, and Baroque is religious. It is the tool, the propaganda tool of the church that wants a pro status quo, and it's the propaganda tool of the divine monarch who tries to con his people into thinking, "God said I get to rule you without any question, I am Louis XIII, you can call me the Sun King. In fact on my medallions, the sun, the source of all life and goodness, shines its beautiful energy onto me. And that energy bounces off me, and it warms up the people of France, and you are lucky I am here. I am the Sun King." This is the divine monarch, he raises with the sun ceremonially, and goes to sleep with the sun as the sun sets, and then he comes out and play some more. But it's just all on show, and you gotta have art that really impresses people if you're going to say, "God said I get a rule you without any question." If you're a divine monarch, which was the standard, the norm, throughout the Middle Ages, you better have an impressive house. Louie invested half of the income of the entire country of France, the most populous and most wealthy country in Europe. Half of the income of the entire country of France to build his Palace at Versailles. He rerouted a river to power his fountains. He could grow incredible gardens. Louie head fountains nobody had ever seen, bursting all around through his gardens. He had mirrors that nobody ever seen, so many mirrors glittering up his Hall of Mirrors so you have the light reflecting in and out. People could wander through these halls, they could wander and just see his lifestyle on display in all the paintings, and just go, "you know he really is an incredible guy we're lucky to have a divine monarch ruling us. Only our king can grow oranges in Paris." They're on wheels, he wheels 'em out on sunny days, and his men wheel 'em back into the Orangerie when it's cloudy and cold, Louie can do it. All the other kings in Europe wanted to be like Louie. They would build their own palaces like Louie. Here's the Schönbrunn for the Habsburgs in Vienna, or you got the great royal palace in Madrid, or you've got the Czar's palace in St. Petersburg. All over the place you got knock-offs of Versailles, all decorated the same way. This is Baroque. Controlled exuberance. The art of divine monarchs, the whole notion that society is divided into the haves and the have-nots, and God wants it that way. This is so poignant. So poignant, when we think about the struggles in our society and the things we're trying to sort through, because along with all these divine monarchs came finance ministers who were just as wealthy, they didn't have the divine power but they were just about as wealthy. And when you travel around France and you go to the chateaux of the Loire and so on, you realize a lot of these incredible chateaux were not the king's chateaux, but they were the finance minister's chateaux. The hedge fund managers of the day, the guys with their hands on the back workings of the economy. And this is just one finance minister's house. And you climb up to the top of his dome and look at his backyard, and he clearly does not know what to do with all his money. Our hedge fund managers have a tough time with their money today, the finance ministers back then we're just as obscenely wealthy. The artist you need to remember from the Baroque era, one of them is Caravaggio. Caravaggio was a rough guy, he did his art with street people in Rome being his models, and he gives everything a harsh 3-degree — third-degree interrogator's light. This sort of unforgiving look at the scene. And here we have David with the head of Goliath, and Goliath is actually the head of the artist, Caravaggio, with the mark of the stone right there between the eyes. This is that kinda baroque energetic emotional sort of art that is so exciting. When you look at Caravaggio scenes, they're sacred scenes portrayed in every day seamy, seedy, street life terms in the streets of Rome, giving it a special impact. Look for the work of Caravaggio. When you go to Spain you'll find the work of Velazquez. Velazquez is — was the court painter. This is a self-portrait here when he's doing Las Meninas. And here's one of the most famous and beloved pieces of art that you'll find anywhere. And we see the artist with his canvas painting the royal couple, but this is the scene the royal couple would look at while they're posing. And if you look in the very back of the room you can see a mirror that shows the reflection of the king and queen as they're posing for Velasquez, with all the kids of the court gathered to see what's going on. And when we look at this, we can almost step into the three-dimensional, and there in the background you see the mirror reflecting the king and the queen posing for this painting. What a delightful sort of mix, and is so realistic you can almost walk into it. And now when we look closely at the brushwork we can see these artists have done reality, you know. Raphael could do reality, now the artists are going to be a little more slapdash with the brushwork to give you a little more energy, without bogging down on that photo detail. Remember, a painter like Velazquez, his primary job, his bread and butter, is painting for the royal court, the royal family. So when the king wants his son painted on a horse, you're going to paint him looking really good on a horse. This is a portrait of the prince in a way that the king would have liked, and that's what Velazquez was all about. But Velazquez had energy to do people on the street, and he had some great slice-of-life art that you will see when you go to the Prado in Madrid. Now in the north, in Belgium, you've got Rubens. And Rubens is one of the most prolific painters you'll find. You can go to his studio in Antwerp and see where he had this just big room where he would crank out — Rubens would paint what they called the "cartoon" and then his students would make the big version, and then Rubens would come in and give what they called the "fury of the brush," and then they would ship it out to some aristocrat, or some nobleman, or some bishops house — palace, you see. And this was that sort of system of Baroque, cranking out masterpieces. To me, this picture by Rubens characterizes the energy of the Baroque art. Now if you compare that to Mona Lisa, you can see Renaissance composure, and balance, and thoughtfulness, and Baroque theatrical exuberance, jump off the stage exuberance. That's what these artists needed to do to keep their patrons happy. You remember they are done to make their patrons feel good, and well fed women with light complexions were considered elegant and high class, and they were painted beautifully. And you have these Rubenesque women that show up in paintings from this period. Remember this is art for the kings and for the church, for the Pope. When you go north now, in the post-Reformation Europe, you have the Netherlands, for instance, which is actually a republic Protestant state. No king and no Pope, no bishops, no nobles. You've got, you've got merchants and big shots in the city, and this is a trauma for painters, because you don't have your traditional patrons. They have to scramble now, and who are they going to paint for? They're going to paint for the Rotary Club, they're going to paint for the mayor, they're going to paint for the rich businessmen, they're going to paint for middle-class people with small no-name paintings. You go to a art gallery in the Netherlands and you see a lot of little paintings by names you don't recognize, and you want to go, "where's your big guns?" This is a new market, and it was a affordable market for merchants in the city. We needed small, affordable, un-preachy art, and that's what you get when you don't have the Pope and you don't have the king to do it. Now the famous artists would do well, they would earn their bread and butter by painting big shots portraits. This would be a beautiful painting of a rich merchant who really loves his wife. Everything is there. His devotion, the big ring on her finger, he's put his hand over his heart, she's got this wonderful ruff, it's just a gorgeous portrait of a man and his wife. You wouldn't have some saint or some king overlooking your dinner table, no way. You're going to have art that just makes you feel good about your values and your hard work. You're gonna have still lifes. Still lifes are a beautiful beautiful genre in the Netherlands. Again, Protestant, no king art. Still lifes that just remind anybody that comes to dinner, this man has some very good pewter. This man knows how to feed his family well. This is a beautiful household, hard work, that Protestant work ethic shows around here. You've got themes that are folk wisdom, not sort of big preachy stuff, but folk wisdom. One of my favorite artists in the genre is Jan Steen. This painting would be the danger of luxury, how affluence will rot out your values. And here we got filthy rich people whose lives are falling apart. Another painting might be, I don't know exactly the name of this, but it's something like "parents be aware, your children are modeling their lives after how you live your life." And here we have people that are very hedonistic, and the kids are there, paying attention. In the window you can see a little boy learning how to smoke, and in the foreground you see two little girls learning how to drink, and they're just going down the same messed up road, and the parents better wake up. That would be your preachy Jan Steen Dutch kind of art. One of the most exquisite painters of this period is Vermeer. There's only a handful of Vermeers in captivity, you'll see four of them in the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam. But Vermeer is beautiful, just sumptuous, exquisite, intimate art. A milkmaid, nothing fancy, just a humble milkmaid in a quiet moment, you can almost hear the milk pouring into the bowl. Beautiful art, you'll see that when you're in the Netherlands. Rembrandt earned his money — that's a self portrait of a young Rembrandt — painting patrons, this man and his wife. This is called the Jewish Bride, and we have all of those details that would make the patron very thankful for this beautiful art masterpiece. This would be the Draper's Guild, and this is how the painters, like Franz Hals and Rembrandt, would earn their keep. They would paint the big shots, all painted equally because they all paid equally, but you still want to have a believable scene, somebody just walked in and went, "hey you guys look over here," and everybody's caught in a candid way. It looks convivial but it also looks equal. Now the standard "Socratine" type equality in the paintings was sort of the bread and butter, or the standard portraits. Rembrandt was a bigger creative spirit than that, and he did the Night Watch. And when you look at the Night Watch you've got a group portrait, but this group portrait is not, you know, short guys in front, it's not everybody equally lit and equally portrayed, how well they are portrayed is dictated by the scene, the composition that Rembrandt has in mind. And not everybody here was happy with the way they were portrayed, it just wasn't equal. Now I don't know if it's too simplistic to say that meant he didn't get much work in his later years, but the fact is, Rembrandt was more creative than what was good for his career as a portrait artist, and the consequence was he spent his last year's pretty much in a, you know, in a desolate sort of run down, depressing sort of situation. Didn't have any work. This is a self-portrait of a "I've seen it all" sort of Rembrandt overlooking the ruins of what was a very successful career. And he spent his last year's painting for himself, basically. And that freed up his beautiful creative spirit, and we get a lot of Rembrandt's masterpieces that are really not done for the taste of his rich patrons, but just done for the love of Rembrandt's style of art. Here we have Jeremiah Lamenting the Destruction of Israel [Jerusalem], a very powerful psychological portrait. Here we have Peter denying that he knows who Jesus is. Talk about a powerful psychological thing. Peter, Jesus' his right-hand man, saying, "I don't know him," as the Roman soldiers quiz him. And here we have Peter confronted by the Romans, and in the background you can see Jesus looking over shoulder, realizing what's going on. Beautiful piece of art, a masterpiece by Rembrandt. Now the Baroque movement gets into a frilly extreme, as art movements do, and Baroque over-the-top is Rococo. Delightful irresponsibility. Giddy, intentionally tripping, unbalanced, giggling, flirting, Rococo. And Rococo is, you know, pink cheeks everywhere. It's the "let them eat cake art." You know, when Marie Antoinette was out in her little peasant hamlet, telling the peasants, "just make do," she was in this Rococo world. And that was sort of the last straw in so many ways for the old regime. So here at the dawn of the French Revolution, we see the end of the Baroque Era. We still have Europe run by big families, the Habsburgs, and the Hohenzollerns, and the Romanovs, and the Bourbons, and we have no Germany, and we have no Italy, and we have things that are going to start to kick into gear into the modern age. We have this pro-status-quo elite society, but at the same time we have the next generation, and talk about a generation gap. What's just around the corner is the people rising up, as the city folk are going to just bust into that feudal pie, and do some violent readjustment. That's the Age of Revolution, and it took a revolution to cut off the head of the king and that whole old regime notion, that some people are born to be rulers, and the rest of us are born to be ruled. And this shot is just a reminder that museums can be exhausting. And when you go to the museum, we hope we can help you out, we've worked very hard to bring you material to help you enjoy the museum while you're still alive and well, okay. I know I'm good for about two hours in a museum, and we've worked very hard. This is called the Victim of the Louvre, at the longest gallery in Europe. We've worked very hard to make the art fun and meaningful, and that is in our book "Europe 101." This book I wrote after — with the beautiful help of my friend Gene Openshaw, and it's written after 25 years of tour guiding, developing a sense of what people need to know, and also what they don't need to know. We know how to make the art come to life. We've got 100 people working at Europe the Back Door, we've got guidebooks for every country in Europe, these come with a passion for art and history, and we have an app now that gives you self-guided tours to your 20 greatest historic walks, and its 20 greatest museums. This is a chance for you to take the tours that we give our tours, but you don't need to take the tour. You can download the app, it's absolutely free, and have me being able to narrate for you whatever visit you want to check out. These are just — they — I'm just so excited about how these can help people enjoy all the art we've been sharing today. So I hope in your upcoming trip you can use the Rick Steves Audio Europe app. I want to remind you that the biggest part of our business these days is our tour program. Each year we take 15,000 or 18,000 people on about 700 different tours around Europe. We have 35 different itineraries, and each of these itineraries is designed to give you maximum travel thrills for every mile, minute, and dollar in your upcoming trip. That's what we're all about at Europe Through the Back Door, and a fundamental part of that is making the history, and making the art come to life. We can sit with you on the rubble of Rome, as I was doing back when I was a college kid with our first groups, and we can make it make sense. We can bring you into the Vatican, and we can explain how that Laocoon inspired the artists of the Renaissance, and we can bring you into the greatest galleries of Europe and make that art come to life. I hope that we can be a part of your travels that way. I want to remind you we've got a lot of art covered in our TV shows. We've produced well over 100 shows, you can watch them for free anytime at ricksteves.com. If you're visiting any destination in Europe, certainly you can find the TV episode on that place, and in there will take you into the museums, take you into the palaces, and do our best to explain it to you. You can travel with us on Facebook if you just get on board at Rick Steves on facebook, we'd love to have you along, This is my personal joy. I've got about a quarter of a million people now that follow me as I get to share an intimate, candid, behind-the-scenes look at our work. That's ongoing at Facebook and at our website at ricksteves.com. There's a world of travel information there to help make your travels more meaningful. So this was "Renaissance and Baroque," that's part two, and we are, after this, ready to step into the modern world. Thank you very much, and happy travels. Thank you, thank you very much.
Info
Channel: Rick Steves Travel Talks
Views: 129,212
Rating: 4.8774929 out of 5
Keywords: Rick Steves (Author), Renaissance (Art Period/Movement), Baroque (Art Period/Movement), Art History (Field Of Study), Rick Steves art history, Rick Steves Europe 101, Rick Steves travel lecture
Id: uF4zhg9lkxk
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 74min 34sec (4474 seconds)
Published: Fri Dec 19 2014
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.