Are HDR Monitors Finally Good? Buying a Monitor Right Now? - August Q&A

welcome back to monitors unboxed it's probably time for a q a session the last one that I did was a couple of months ago and since then I've been covering a fair few different monitor releases all sorts of things are happening so yeah it's August it's time for a monitor q a thanks to everyone who has submitted questions whether that's via our YouTube Community tab or our Discord chat which is exclusive to our patreon and float plane supporters lots and lots of great questions far more than I could put even possibly cover it in this sort of episode so yeah lots of great stuff let's get right into it first question as monitors are typically longer term build Investments would it be worthwhile to release a piece of content going over which monitor brands have good acceptable poor warranty programs for example if I spend a thousand dollars on a monitor I would prefer not to have several dead pixels out of the box yeah this is a question that comes up a lot for monitors and also for a lot of the other components that we cover over on Hardware unboxed asking reviews you know look into the warranty programs the support that companies provide to people after they've bought their products and obviously this is a really key component of people's buying decisions they want to know that if their product breaks they'll be able to get a replacement and certainly with monitors things like dead pixel policies things like that very important as reviews though it is very difficult to evaluate warranties we can sort of look at what a warranty policy is and I've started to do that a little bit with some of the OLED monitors looking at whether burning is or isn't covered in the warranty I think that's pretty important but even among a lot of companies they're offering different warranty programs in different countries so for some Brands like Samsung is one example they may offer a one year or two year warranty in one company in one country sorry or then maybe a three or four year warranty in a different country or in countries like Australia where we have different consumer laws they're sort of bound by different warranty processes so they may be forced to offer a longer warranty in that country so as far as like evaluating warranties is concerned it's pretty difficult from that perspective and you're going to have to more look into what's available in your region what are the warranty policies in your reach and what are the laws in your region that are allowing for sort of those Aftercare support things and then when looking at things like support thought like you know how easily does a company deal with rmas are they more willing to accept certain defects over others again this is quite a difficult thing to evaluate even if I buy a monitor as a reviewer nothing may happen to it it may be perfectly fine and not need to go through an RMA process so then we're relying on user reports and evaluations things like that which again it's pretty murky territory we're sort of having to evaluate what is the likelihood of that you know what percentages of people are sort of complaining about these sort of processes and that can be difficult to evaluate based on online reports again the usual thing that happens is that angry customers will post something negative but then positive customers won't so you're kind of having to toss that sort of thing up so with that a lot of really good evidence into warranty programs from each company something we tend not to cover as much of in reviews and yeah we'll continue to look at things like burning policies for OLED monitors dead pics so policy is a fairly similar across most brands but it's something I guess we could look at a bit more into but yeah warranty is a difficult thing to evaluate for reviews will you ever do reviews of more professionally oriented monitors like asus's Pro art series for example would be nice to validate claims and see what others think before spending a pretty penny considering how expensive they can be and how important to your livelihood they might be for pro users at home I'd always like to look at probiotics I think there's definitely some interest there and those products are obviously very important for a certain set of people it's more a time thing for us um you know I'm doing most of the monitor reviews here and there are so many gaming monitors that are released every year that are worth covering that I really don't have much time to check out the professional side of things and then on top of that obviously if we start looking at Pro monitors one of the strengths of our content is that comparative data so you can look at how one monitor compares to a lot of other monitors and because we haven't really looked at a lot of pro monitors some of those early reviews are probably not going to be super great in terms of that data and information so for now our man Focus will continue to be gaming monitors but maybe in the future there'll be a period of time where there'll be some spare time and we can start looking at some of the pro monitors maybe just some of the the more popular ones on the market but yeah as I said you know if there was if I could clone myself I'd get the Clone to do professional monitors um but for now yeah just gaming monitors what are the advantages and disadvantages of going Ultra wide against just buying two separate monitors both for productivity especially is a developer for example and for gaming so I think for gaming there's pretty obvious advantages here especially if you're only talking about Ultra wide versus two 16x9 monitors side by side it is much easier to get a game to span across multiple you know span across the entire width of your ultrawide display as opposed to across multiple monitors especially if you only have two monitors difficult for that to happen you often have that seam down the middle not great for gaming experience and even with three monitors and sort of those Affinity Nvidia surround setups pretty janky compared to just getting Ultra wide monitor these days games are much better at supporting those sort of ultra wide formats and yeah monitored bezel seams and things not great for for a gaming experience so certainly for gaming the advantages are the extra immersivity from the image sort of extending a bit further around and if you go beyond 21.9 to 32 9 in those super ultra wide formats it gets more and more advantages for gaming in terms of its immersion not all games will support those formats but a lot of them do and I think think for that style of gaming if that's what you're after it certainly makes more sense as for productivity work you know if you are getting one of those super ultra wide monitors they can be equivalent to two 16x9 monitors side by side so if you're doing basic things like snapping apps to the left and right they'll be pretty similar to getting to separate monitors but operating systems like Windows even with their snapping abilities don't handle Ultra wide formats quite as well with window management compared to having separate monitors you can get some utilities that will improve that sort of setup but the easiest way is to have separate monitors there are some things like for example if you wanted to have work on one screen like you were doing your productivity apps and you want to have a full screen video on the other screen that's much easier with separate monitors you just move your video window over to one screen hit maximize it fills up that whole screen whereas if you have an ultra wide monitor just one monitor but it's really wide you hit maximize that video will go into the entirety of your Ultra wide screen with my eyes at the at the sides again some software utilities may be able to do that a little better but for productivity yeah having the separation of monitors is that a little bit better it just depends on sort of your use case and what you're after if you're more productivity focused then having multiple monitors may make more sense but if you're doing that mixture of productivity and gaming then there are certainly reasons to get Ultra wide even 21x9 Ultra wides I find to be pretty effective for my sort of use cases you know things like Premier tend to spread out nicely across an ultra wide monitor side-by-side apps works pretty well but you just have to look at your use case the apps you're using how much full screen work you're doing on one monitor versus another monitor and things like that so there's no right or wrong answer here I don't think always curious about the state of hdr on monitors has it improved do we have any good options for a decent price or is it the same three or four high-end only monitors for a thousand dollars plus certainly if you want the best experience on HDR monitors you are looking at that sort of a thousand dollar plus range where the 27 inch 1440p 240Hz stuff is as well as the 34 inch cutie Olin Ultra wides however prices have started to come down a little bit for those high-end products I've seen the LG 27 gr95qe come down to around 800 which again is still an expensive price we're not talking about affordable budget bang for buck monitors but they debuted a thousand dollars in our 800 that's pretty good price movement again the qdo leads they debuted around thirteen hundred dollars with aw3423 ZW these days eleven hundred dollars even a thousand dollars is possible so again things are shifting a little bit there for those you know cream of the crop type monitors unfortunately some of the like 4K mini LED stuff is still very expensive 14 1500 for the 32 inch sort of Flagship top of the line stuff hopefully that'll come down in price but things are improving however I get I get the Samsung this question that you're sort of more asking about the mid-range price points like are we getting good HDR at 400 500 ish dollars there are some panels that are offering full array local dimming for example with an IPS LCD around the sort of 500 600 700 price points I've tested a couple of them I haven't been super impressed with the performance there have been some downsides things like flickering like those Cooler Master monitors for example that we tested I believe the AOC variants have the same sort of issues there's been a few other variants as well I believe again with because they use that same panel have the same sort of issues so as far as that mid-range price points are concerned we're still looking at edgelete local dimming which isn't great not a lot of OLED options available around those price points just yet but when we look at the overall trend of the monitor Market I think those things will start to come more into play over the next couple of years again old ads I expect those to continue shifting down in price especially once we get a next Generation on some of those panels like if there's is a next-gen you know 16x9 OLED monitor that I expect those existing products will shift down in price a bit and a lot of panel development at the moment is focused around mini LED for LCDs there's a lot of OLED development going on at the moment so I would expect that over time we will get some of those 500 600 true HDR products with less of the downsides that we've seen in that price category already so yeah hopefully 2024 is when maybe some of those more affordable products will start hitting the market I'm not expecting any too much movement sort of 200 300 for HDR anytime soon but yeah I would expect that with Trends the HDR affordability will be getting quite a bit better over the next couple of years have you seen DIY perks video where he built a monitor with two panels for really high contrast what are your thoughts on it yeah I did see this video uh very interesting video the ability to create a dual layer LCD um as sort of a DIY project is pretty impressive so yeah kudos to DIY perks who are getting that project working um dual air LCD monitors do exist there are some mastering and reference monitors that use a dual layer technology as well as I think there were a couple of TV prototypes that didn't really go very far that used Jeweler LCD so the advantage of using a dual layer LCD is that effectively you've got one LCD layer controlling light output from the backlight and then you've got the second LCD layer that shows the image it's not really I guess the full picture but the idea being that when you have an LCD that's fully switched off so it's trying to block out backlight from you know light from leaking through to show black there is still some light leakage which we typically see as sort of that one thousand to one contrast ratio you know blacks aren't true black on an LCD because some light does leak through that Liquid Crystal layer so then you add a second layer in and hopefully that will block out you know another set of light so by the time light passes through the first layer and the second layer and it's trying to show something like black those blacks will be super dark super rich and effectively it should give a dual LCD you know per pixel local dimming it's really a sort of clever way of approaching you know the disadvantages of LCDs they need a backlight so difficult to dim properly get that sort of OLED level per pixel dimming you Chuck two layers in potentially solve some of those problems and that's basically what di were DIY perks did with their very clever designed panel there are some limitations though with this sort of Technology the first one being that you need to crank the brightness of the LCD super high like the backlight used to be very very bright to get enough light output to pass through both LCD layers there is always some weight loss through the LCD layers themselves so when you put a second one on obviously that compounds the light loss it ends up being that you need to run the backlight very bright which uses quite a lot of power heat output as well so they're not a very efficient display technology which is why I don't think they have ever really gone very far for Consumer oriented products things like TVs as an example whereas for mastering and reference monitors where you're all interested in picture quality you don't really care about power consumption they make a lot more sense so from that perspective yeah consumer products iffy maybe they could improve the efficiency they're not sure and then on top of that you sort of got syncing issues as well you need to open and close the LCD layers at identical times like exactly the same time otherwise you will get longer response time issues we've seen this a little bit with fald monitors where they're trying to turn on the different lighting zones of the backlight and run the LCD layer at the same time if those sorts of things are slightly out of sync you will see some motion artifacts on the on the screen you will get a bit longer ghosting things like that so again when you've got dual layers working trying to work them at the exact same time there's two response time Curves in play one for the front and one for the rear layer and if they're not synced again those response times can increase so it would be very interesting to see the DIY perks monitor in person to sort of evaluate how those sorts of things are handled again it's a DIY project I'm sure that that aspect of Motion Performance was not high on the agenda it was more trying to get them more into working and they did very impressive um but yeah again if this was like a a product that you could actually buy those are the sorts of things that that I'd be concerned about so again very interesting project it sort of shows that I guess if people out there who are interested could make a product like this but yeah I think I'll stick to my OLED monitors when it comes to trying to get that perfect so local doing in your opinion is now a good time to shop for a new monitor or is it worth waiting for new attacks such as OLED to become more common and therefore cheaper I'd like to upgrade from my 1080p 24 inch IPS to Something in the 1440p 27 inch range but prices are yet to drop to something I would consider affordable I'm hoping new releases will make existing panels cheaper even if I then have to buy something slightly behind the technology curve thoughts so I guess first of all if you're planning on upgrading from 1080p to 40 and 40p 27 inch all that is probably not going to be in that sort of mid-range price point anytime soon certainly seems like most the panel development is for high-end products some of the other panels coming out are things like 32 inch 4K OLED stuff again that's still several years away but seems like a lot of the development is for those sort of Flagship high-end products so if you're planning on doing that 1080p to 1440p upgrade I'm imagining your you know especially if affordability is a concern I'm imagining you're thinking of buying sort of that mid-range 300 and Below price point especially if you've got a 1080p monitor you probably bought that especially if it was recently for you know a relatively low cost so again are we going to say 1440p 144 Hertz for example down around 200 so it seems like there has been a bit of stagnation the cheapest products have sort of settled around 250 us with 1080p still in that 150 to 200 range but there are new panels coming out that I think could be a little bit price aggressive on some of those monitors there's a new section of 1440p 240 hertz IPS panels that I think will be around that 300 to 350 price range I've already reviewed one of the Acer models I've got an MSI model here to test as well that I believe is sub 350 so if we're getting 1440p 240 hertz around 300 to 350 then yeah you'd expect there'd be some price pressure to push down the existing of 1440p 144 Hertz ish stock closer and closer to 200 so I think it definitely will happen um it's just a matter of when and there's been as I said a little bit of stagnation in that 1440p price category for the last maybe a couple of years we sort of had seen it jump down to from 500 to around 300 relatively quickly but then making that jump from 300 to 200 has been a lot slower and I certainly would like to see monitors around 200 because that would really start to push 1080p into you know further and further away from sort of new entry-level builds so as far as like buying now or waiting I guess it really depends on the category that you're looking at if you did want a 1440p 240Hz monitor again there's probably going to be some more affordable options in the mid-range and around that 300 to 400 price range I think there's there's quite a lot of great options at the moment that I'd be sort of buying now but if I was really keen on sort of pushing the limits of 200 sort of thinking you know what's available is there going to be things improved in the near future it's a hard call to make because I'm trying to predict the future here um but certainly you know you're probably not going to be getting yeah I don't think we'll be getting like a super amazing 1440p 144hz monitor at 200 anytime soon um maybe the next couple of years but not like the next couple of months sort of time frame so yeah I think the monitor Market generally is looking pretty good at the moment a lot of the different categories that we like to sort of look at entry level mid-range high-end or pretty pretty awesome products in some of those price categories at the moment so I don't think there's heaps of Advantage weight there isn't that product that I'm sort of looking at six months in the future and going that's going to really disrupt the monitor Market the products we've got at the moment a pretty good monitor iteration is also fairly slow so if I had to vote one way or the other I'd say probably get something now why aren't there any more of the next gen VA type of panel outside of Samsung's offering don't they sell their panel to other display makers why do we keep seeing the ancient VA type of Technology being made when Samsung next-gen VA is superior to it in nearly every way now certainly agree that the Samsung way of doing things is superior again it's a difficult question to answer I don't have all the answers for this one as to why monitor makers do certain things that they are doing I think the actual VA panel technology isn't super different from the older stuff to the newer stuff that Samsung has been using there have been some backlight differences some you know mini LED zones and things about separate to the actual via LCD the actual panel itself I do think again not 100 sure is reasonably similar to what was used previously the main advantage that Samsung has is the way they appear to be using utilizing overdrive overdrive is very important for Via LCDs to get the speed up to an acceptable level and it seems like the the classic issue that we see from those older slower models is that they're applying the overdrive to the entirety of the panel as a whole so they're sort of going okay you know we've got this monitor very slow dark transitions but the the brighter transitions are reasonable so there's kind of two ways of going about it you can keep the monitor you know middling to slow overall which is going to keep those dark transitions very slow but for those brighter transitions it's not going to introduce inverse ghosting so for a lot of the time when you're not you know seeing those sort of dark transitions you're not going to introduce artifacts by going with that sort of alternate overdrive approach the alternate overdrive approach being okay let's try and solve the dark smearing by bumping up the overdrive massively to make the dark transitions much faster but that makes those brighter transitions much faster as well which is then going to introduce overshoot and artifacts and that tends to be sort of that that issue with the massive discrepancy in VA panel performance between your dark Transitions and your brighter transitions what Samsung seems to have done at least with their processing and again I'm not 100 sure on this I don't know how those marches are made is that they've gone with well we can just apply different levels of overdrive for the darker Transitions and different levels of overdrive for the brighter transitions which kind of solves two separate themes they can increase the speed for those dark transitions by cranking up the overdrive when it notices a dark transition but then for the brighter transitions they can keep that speed nice and and balanced and managed and that's where we see those you know some of those VA panels from Samsung having much better performance but at least to me again just want to stress 900 sure at least to me it looks like this is a processing side of things Samsung tends to use a different processor for their monitor Hardware something that's a bit more powerful it's got a few more features again it allows some of that mini LED stuff to be occurring as well for the Neo G7 Neo G8 line so with the combination of that more powerful processor and the way they want to tune their Hardware they're able to get much better VA panel performance I think with some of the other brands they just simply aren't willing to invest the time and effort to make you know that VA panel run like a Samsung monitor to improve the processing Hardware design their own processor that maybe can do that dual sort of Zone um you know overdrive sort of setup which again I'd like to see other panel vendors other monitor manufacturers opting for that sort of va tuning I think there could be some really compelling high-end products made if the tuning was done in a similar way to how Samsung is doing it but it seems like a lot of those vendors are more just taking the off-the-shelf approach where they just they take the panel they grab a backlight they grab a fairly basic processor they tune it in very standard ways and you end up with those VA monitors which are not very impressive so again even you know to be fair even Samsung has sort of faltered a little bit with some of their VA monitors I just reviewed the the 43 inch model the Neo G7 43 inch version from Samsung which uses a VA panel and that panel does not have very good um tuning either in terms of overdrive and overshoot and dark level smearing those sorts of things so would really like to see improved tuning for V8 monitors maybe it'll happen at some point in the future I imagine for Samsung's own products made by the Samsung Electronics division they'll keep that tuning that processing the processing Hardware to themselves as sort of a proprietary Advantage for them so it's really up to all the other vendors to work hard improve the processing improve the overdrive tuning for VA products I think it's possible but we just need to see some people do it I've been going back and forth between 1440p 240Hz OLED and a 4K mini LED monitor what's a better long-term investment this is a very difficult question a very difficult question because my normal instinct to this would be something like it depends or even in this case there's no right or wrong answer in terms of it being a better long-term investment but if I was going to break it down I think I'd say that the 1440p like OLED monitor 240Hz OLED is probably going to have better experience for you now and a lesser experience later especially if you start to see things like burning and degradation of the panel over time so I think if you're going to be biased more towards today versus the future especially because it's a 1440p resolution again we've got the sub pixel issue so text Clarity isn't great on that monitor um as we move further and further into the future I imagine 4K will become more and more relevant so I think the main advantages that you'll be getting going the OLED option will be you want the best experience right now you want something that's very easy for your GPU to run 1440p is you know less taxing than 4K you want a great HDR experience now you want all the benefits of OLED you're not super concerned about burning in the short term then all that is going to be better for now although I still expect them to age reasonably well especially if you manage burning you're not using it for a lot of static apps if you do that I still expect the OLED to last a fairly long time but if we're talking about LCD mini LED D we're talking about 4K resolution you're probably not going to get as awesome of an ex as an experiences all that today but I expect you'll have a bit longer longevity 4K resolution is probably going to age better than 1440p again that's just a guess 1440p it's still very good today especially if you're going with a sort of a larger 4K display it's probably going to age a little bit better burning won't be a concern so if you are thinking of using it for five six seven years probably more likely that you'll get that from the mini LED LCD without any issues compared to the OLED so you're sort of back ending it a little bit and that's how I'd be thinking about it all lead a bit better for the now LCD maybe not quite as good for now but will be better in the long term again that's something that you'll have to toss up I don't think there's a right or wrong answer here I wouldn't definitively say that the LCD will last longer or be on average the better buy I think it's very hard to toss up but certainly what I've seen from those top end mini LED LCDs from a top end OLED they're great experience and again whether you do more gaming maybe swing more of the OLED more productivity maybe you'll swing more to the LCD I think that's probably more where I'd be making the decision on the use case for me the sort of things I'm interested in doing less so on the lifespan especially for a home product but yeah those are just my thoughts on that I think it's a very very hard decision very hard question to answer properly would you ever consider doing TV reviews similar to your monitor coverage and not just TVs that you could use as a monitor I mean like as a TV that you'd have in your living room we get this question a lot and I think I say this about maybe some of the questions but genuinely I get asked to do TV reviews a lot and at the moment I don't have any plans on covering TVs it's very similar to the professional monitor question we got earlier I simply don't have the time to cover TVs and again it's sort of like an experience thing as well my experience is more testing monitors I've tested hundreds of monitors now the things that make TVs good are slightly different because they use for slightly different use cases so we need to do a lot of research into it we need to get a lot of comparative data in as well before we start producing reviews which is a big time commitment and again so many gaming monitors are coming out that keeps me perfectly well occupied so yeah TV is not really on the agenda for us I don't think we'll really ever cover TVs I don't see it being something that we cover and there are lots of other reviewers out there that do a great job of covering TVs HDTV Test on YouTube is a great Channel we've also got ratings where again they do more reviews as well but some of their TV reviews are excellent so again there are people out there who are covering TVs in depth and I think there are great reviews already available so yeah with monitors being perhaps more of a niche area I'll stick to covering them just for now what limits the color accuracy of a monitor even after calibration yeah this is a good question there is you know after calibration you can typically get most monitors to a very similar level especially if you're using a software calibration and there are decent Hardware controls but there are always limits to that one of the the primary limits that we see is simply color space coverage so if you had if you say calibrating to DCI P3 because you want to do a bit of wide gamut creative work with video then you know you'd need a hundred percent DCI P3 monitor to get the best accuracy after calibration if you've only got 90 or 95 the very top edges of that gamut will not be accessible so the accuracy for showing those very edges of the gamut um you know is simply not going to be possible now you can argue how relevant the very outer parts of the gamut are a lot of the time you you probably going to be more in the center of the gamut than the outer edges but nevertheless gamut coverage does affect the overall accuracy of a monitor after calibration you still want the highest gamut coverage before calibration is not something that a calibration can fix I've also seen a bit over the years of OLED being a bit more difficult to calibrate than an LCD LCD is a much more stable consistent products than oleds for example as we've seen many times the performance of an OLED can change depending on the average Picture level especially if there's an automatic brightness limiter so if we're talking about small bright Windows versus large bright Windows performance can differ there and if you calibrate an OLED for say a 10 window size so for 10 APL then that performance may not hold for a hundred percent or 75 APL with large full screen white windows so that can be quite a tricky thing to deal with with an OLED and it's not really something we have great scope for you know properly calibrating at the moment you're really just relying on the the power manufacturer to make that all that as stable as possible across as wide of a range of things as as we can get and that's that's the case there are definitely some old monitors where performance doesn't change very much depending on APL where things don't change very much depending on other conditions and you can calibrate it say 10 and then you get nice usable performance across the entirety of the Monitor and all of its different capabilities but there are some products where definitely that is of concern and of consideration so yeah that sort of the two main things that I can think of right now where you know calibration can be affected by other panel Hardware capabilities and again for some products that are really poorly calibrated from the factory that don't have a lot of great Hardware controls or OSD controls to tune things up then there are some limitations to how much your calibration can actually do you can run into issues where contrast is degraded or you get color banding or there are you know there's a bunch of other issues which is why you tend to want to have the monitor as well calibrated in the hardware before you go the software route you don't want the software to have to be compensating for too much um so yeah those are the sort of things that that I'd be sort of thinking about about accuracy after calibration there are some differences but certainly calibration can reduce a lot of the differences that we see out of the box from different monitors still highly recommend doing it for most people and yeah that's pretty much it final question do you prefer monitor stands with a single small rectangular-ish base like most BenQ Esports monitors or a thin two-prong stand like LG or gigabyte tend to use yeah don't really have much of a preference here I can sort of make a case for either one you know the the three prong stand I think has some advantages if those prongs are raised up if we're sort of just looking at a monitor that's relatively flat and then the prongs just extend outwards then that can occupy a lot of desk space and there are certainly you know the gigabyte launches tend to have the flat sort of large x extending prong design whereas there are some launches that you know they only have small contact points on your desk and then they sort of extend upwards to the pillar which then you know it leaves a little bit of space underneath the legs where you can potentially put a few things um so I think that that you know definitely not a huge fan of those sort of big bases that use up a lot of desk space I prefer the sort of more elevated um three-pronged leg design I think the BenQ design is also a really clever way of going about it where they've just got a very small but very sturdy base the risk obviously when you go for a smaller base is that it becomes less sturdy because there's less you know it's maybe not as much weight in the base to keep them onto stable especially for a larger screen that can be a bit of an issue which is why we tend to see more of those prong designs um certainly for smaller mantras the small base makes sense especially if you can tilt the monitor because as they've sort of shown some of their marketing images you can put your keyboard at a different orientations doesn't really occupy a lot of space but again really comes down to the exact design that they're using how effectively the space is being utilized how many things you can put under the sort of legs and around the legs as to how effective it is but I don't like I'm not sitting here saying this is a really important aspect of monitors I don't think it makes that much difference I would certainly prioritize this well down in terms of the sort of hierarchy of what's important to a monitor but yeah desk space should be a concern and consideration for monitor designers make sure you're leaving a reasonable amount of space around the base so that people can still swallow in things like speakers or other Hardware all right and that does it for the monitors unboxed q a session for August thanks to everyone that submitted questions to us via the YouTube Community tab there were hundreds of questions in there lots of really good ones that maybe we'll have to say for a Future q a series and of course to our Discord members as well who are either supporting us via patreon or float plane you get sort of that exclusive q a section in there and I really appreciate a lot of the monetary questions that you guys ask in there if you do want to become a hardware unbox supporter which is also a monitors unbox supporter then links are in the description below for our patreon and flip plan accounts not only will we gain access to the Discord Community but also things like a monthly live streams we've got BTS videos and yeah some of the ICC profile stuff some of the OSD settings and things we provide a database for our members which has got all that information in there so yeah that pretty much does it for this one thanks for watching I'll catch you in the next one [Music] [Music]

Channel: Monitors Unboxed

Views: 95,390

Keywords:

Id: tfICFBvsrW0

Length: 34min 37sec (2077 seconds)

Published: Fri Aug 04 2023