Annoying Aliens

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
This video is sponsored by CuriosityStream.  Get access to my streaming video service,   Nebula, when you sign up for CuriosityStream  using the link in the description.   When we contemplate our first  meetings with alien civilizations   we tend to fear they will be hostile,  hope that will be benevolent,   and guess they will be a mixture of both just like  our own civilizations often are. But what if turns   out they aren’t so much benevolent or hostile  as just really insufferable and irritating?   Welcome back to Science & Futurism with  Isaac Arthur for another mid-month Scifi   Sundays episode, where we examine popular  notions from science fiction and ask about   how realistic they are, and this month we’ll be  returning to our Alien Civilization series for   a look at alien civilization or strategies that  are presumably meant to be profound or clever,   but on inspection are stupid or annoying. This  summer is also the 25th anniversary of the Alien   scifi Blockbuster Film Independence  Day, which while an enjoyable film,   is full of this sort of behavior so I thought  we’d give it a bit of extra attention today.   That film came out in the mid-90s and the  preceding decade had been big on alien   conspiracies and ancient aliens, indeed that  film’s director Roland Emmerich’s previous   film had been Stargate, the founding film of the  Stargate Franchise which focuses a lot on ancient   aliens. It was also when crop circles were a  big thing and folks thought this or that big   circle or pattern in a field indicated a UFO  had landed or carved a message. My longtime   reaction and sentiment to that was to wonder what  sort of mindset would do that and the trickster   or social malcontent came to mind. Those folks  whose humor in type or execution is misaligned   so that they think they’re very funny but mostly  make the rest of us grit our teeth and try not   to throttle them. People who are often nice  enough but fundamentally just very annoying.   That’s what always came to mind for me with crop  circles, I just pictured some alien trying to make   a profound or humorous point without realizing  how inconvenient and unnecessary their medium was.   Let me go knock some corn over as opposed  to just burning the signs into the ground   with my overpowered anti-meteor and collision  lasers or just transmitting it as a pattern on   the very active terrestrial radio stations. I  mean if the objective is secrecy or subtlety,   writing your name or message or ship footprint  100 meters wide in some actively tended field is   a pretty darned inept method at doing that. Various science fiction satire works,   most memorably the Hitchhiker’s Guide to Galaxy,  have played around with the idea that the alien   sightings and monuments are genuine but  left as a prank. That the flying saucers,   abductions, crop circles, and so on were the work  of galactic pranksters or bored alien teenagers.   Fundamentally I suppose I mean “Annoying” for  this episode to be annoying to us as an audience,   especially for genre-savvy scifi veterans who  know what a red shirt is, who Han shot first,   why blowing up a giant mothership, be it  hanging over Earth or in Orbit of Endor is   likely to cause mass extinction on the planet  below, not celebrations, and who often wonder   why evil galactic empires with countless planets  under their control only ever seem to be able   to summon armies of a few hundred who seem to be  armed with weapons no deadlier than modern ones.   Now of course this series, Alien Civilizations,  is meant to be rather tongue-in-cheek,   but at the same time we are trying to contemplate  how realistic these scenarios are to fine tune   what the real scenario out in the Universe is,  since we have so little information on what aliens   are actually like or if they even exist. We can  examine a notion like being abducted and probed   on an alien ship, and ask how realistic it is that  an alien should need to do this, but what we are   often doing instead isn’t saying if they would  or could, but if they are, why they might do so.   I’m generally known as an extreme  skeptic on alien visitations to Earth,   though principally because I don’t think there’s  any alien civilizations in our own galaxy. Down   the years I’ve gotten to hear from lots of folks  who have had sightings or abduction experience or   been investigators on such incidents, and I’m not  really skeptical about the witnesses themselves.   Doubtless some are dishonest or confused or  attention seekers but most are honest witnesses.   I just don’t think they’re accurate and not  because I think aliens wouldn’t visit Earth.   Quite to the contrary, I’d find it nearly  unbelievable that they wouldn’t visit Earth.   It's that I tend to find the ways they  allegedly do so don’t make sense.   For any given crime there’s motives, means, and  opportunity, and vandalizing someone’s field or   abducting them is a crime, whether it's done by  a prankster or an alien or an alien prankster,   but motive and means and opportunity apply to  most actions, not just crimes. This is how we   try to look at any given alien sighting or popular  scifi alien trope, not by asking so much if it is   true or likely, as what might make it likely. As an example, folks will sometimes suggest   Aliens abduct us for DNA samples, but if  that’s all they wanted, at this point it   would be a lot more covert and productive to rob  a vending machine or mailbox to pull DNA samples   off all the coins or letters in them. So that  option doesn’t fit. That doesn’t mean there are   no motives to abduct humans, hardly I can  think of dozens, but often on examination   these don’t work out too well either with our  common assumptions of what they might want.   As another example, you might abduct folks to scan  their brains and need them conscious for that,   since you want to study those neurons firing  at various stimuli. You also might very limited   options for erasing or clouding memories  of you performing this experiment on them,   given that the ability to cleanly wipe  a memory without flaw or occasional   failure would imply a very sophisticated  knowledge of our brain which presumably   you would not yet have if you were  abducting folks to study their brains.   You rarely bother expending vast effort  studying something you have already mastered.   They probably would be able to disrupt or obscure  short term memory after even fairly limited study,   there are some techniques that can  seriously screw with short term memory,   many of which are easier if you have certain  high-tech but non-human specific tools   like gamma knives, where you could just be  recording which neurons fired with whatever   you were doing and torch the ones in the memory  areas that you saw activate during your session.   Such being the case it's entirely plausible  you would need to have abducted tons of   people and some of them came away with partial  recollection of the event. The thing is if that   was your specific goal, you probably started  with corpses, they’re in plentiful supply and   we do conveniently preserve and store them  where grave robbing wouldn’t be too hard.   You can get a lot from cutting into those and  electrically stimulating them, and get plenty more   by just downloading our own internet-available  records of MRI and neurology in general.   Pre-internet, pre-MRI, this particular  abduction theory made a bit more sense,   but in a more modern context we would  assume they did as I just suggested,   accessing our available studies of it, doing  some graverobbing, and then and only then started   abducting real live folks to refine that beyond  what our equipment permitted. Which is plausible   enough but folks are often reported as abducted  from their bedroom or vehicle. Both of those   would be pretty ideal places to hide passive  but impressive brain scanners, or even active   but non-invasive ones, you could probably even  steal power from the available supply in the car   or bedroom to run your device and transmitter. Between watching the TV and watching the road,   either is going to provide nearly every common  human stimuli and you can be recording what those   were too. There may be some specific stimuli you  would still need to abduct and expose someone to,   as being too obscure or bizarre  to expect normal life to provide,   but you could wait on those till you mastered  the human brain and erasing short term memories.   Keep in mind at this point this wouldn’t be  some fleeting distorted memory of the event   that was warped by drugs, they’d probably could  have recorded every neuron firing during that   abduction then precisely removed them, and they  probably would have left a chip into monitor   you for signs of memory or reactions later  on, that’s what I’d do anyway if I were in   their shoes or whatever passes for footwear or its  equivalent for aliens with no discernible feet.   An obvious rebuttal might be that they genuinely  just don’t care if they leave memories, but the   implicit reason there is that they are unethical  not ignorant or indifferent to the problem of it,   and such being the case, the easiest way to keep  an abductee from spilling the beans if you want   them not to, is to kill them. Alternatively, I  mentioned pranksters as an option, and that one   fits pretty well in many ways because its easy  to believe a small and unorganized minority of   some bigger civilization occasionally showed up  on planets and played those sorts of hijinks.   They know what will generally be viewed as  annoying or too small of crime for their own   authorities to get involved, wrecking fields and  scaring some folks might not be worth the trouble   to intervene, so they limit themselves to that. If we’re assuming small and unorganized miscreants   as an option, it is probably worth noting  that at least some alien abduction cases   are thought to be confused memories of some  more mundane if traumatic or criminal event   and that if we’re assuming rogue elements  of an alien civilization are in play,   that they can be just as capable of doing  such things. In a potential population   pool of trillions upon trillions in even the most  modest interstellar empire, you are going to have   a lot of xenophiles or twisted criminals unless  they are much better at detection and treatment   of such behavior than we are. Of course, key  thing there, they probably are better at that.   There’s also sustainability. A race of aliens  whose brain doesn’t even use the same chemistry   as ours might need a long while to adapt to our  brains or our biology or culture in general,   but you should expect the patterns and reasons  for sighting or abductions to change over   time. They complete the mission, or learn what  they need, or the pranks get old and stale.   With over half a century of sightings, we can  say realistically they aren’t gathering human   DNA anymore if they ever were. They would have  all they needed by now. On the other hand one   could easily imagine them trying to get a full  catalog of every species on Earth, in the many   millions of them, especially the endangered ones  which would be hardest to find and harvest. That   might easily provide thousands of ships thousands  of flights, only a handful of which ever got   spotted due to some error of stealth systems. Its common to rebut sighting by pointing out that   a civilization capable of building ships able  to cross hundred of trillions of kilometers   of space safely shouldn’t be having them crash  on Earth, but realistically an atmosphere and   gravity well would tend to be where a ship  would have maintenance issues cropping up,   plus we tend to assume Murphy’s Law  still applies to high-tech civilizations.   It certainly hasn’t stopped applying to us, our  stuff breaks all the time and it's not hard to   imagine some “Save the Earth Species” group, might  be poorly funded and working with very secondhand   equipment bought at auction that needs to stop for  repairs more often than it needs to stop for fuel.   If you’re running thousands of missions,  having only a few get spotted and only   kinda-sorta would be very impressive. There’s also a tacit assumption about them   getting spotted that they would go into panic mode  if we did, and in case like this is might just be   a policy to ‘avoid getting spotted, don’t stop and  chat, don’t interfere’ that everybody agrees to   but not something they get fired or prosecuted  or vaporized for breaking on accident.   This is what it comes down to though,  some civilization shows up here and we   observe a behavior and we try to figure out  why they would be doing it, or alternatively,   someone suggests a behavior or motive  and we ask if it makes any sense.   In our regular episode for the week back on  Thursday we looked at Stellar Strip Mining,   and those aliens in the Independence Day film  apparently went in for that too, traveling   from system to system, clearing it out of what  they wanted, then moving on to a new one as the   supply ran out. This seems a weird thing since you  have got to carry all that mass around with you,   which is the hardest part of space travel, and  for all that time, which is the hardest part of   interstellar space travel. That time element tends  to imply you are actually very good at resource   utilization and recycling since you’re spending  decades in between solar systems. Efficient mass   and resource use should be your civilizations  top priorities for research and development.   The ship in that film, the original, is plain  huge, even by the standards of this channel   where we tend not to even deem something on the  small side of being a megastructure if it's not   bigger than a mountain. Nonetheless it was tiny in  size compared to a planet and even tinier in terms   of mass. The film implies and the Independence  Day wiki confirms that the evil alien race here,   the Harvesters, harvest whole  planets to refuel their ships.   That same wiki entry starts off by describing  them as “a race of highly intelligent and   incredibly technologically advanced hive-mind  extraterrestrial beings. They are a threat of   universal proportions that seeks to harvest and  destroy planets to refuel their ships, to grow,   and to perfect their technology at the expense  of driving indigenous races to extinction.”   I’d really take issue with that “Highly  Intelligent and Incredibly Technologically   Advanced” part, especially given how easily their  system gets hacked by humans in the original film   and their unshielded ships are so easily shot  down by our jet fighters. The implication there   is that the aliens are so stupid they  can’t even properly engineer a spaceship   or space habitat or invest any real effort in  learning how to properly harvest or utilize   resources. There’s evil, ruthless, and greedy,  and then there’s just dumb, see our episode   Stellar Strip Mining for how to do it right. Anyway I enjoyed the original film but lots of   bad science and plot holes there, the  aliens are shown to be amazingly strong   yet weirdly and stupidly fragile, so that  they seem more annoying than terrifying.   That’s true of a lot of big-bads in science  fiction, and particularly ones like the Daleks   from Doctor Who or the Borg from Star Trek who  undergo what’s known as “Villain Decay”, which   is when an enemy that’s initially frightening in a  story slowly seems weaker and often comedic after   multiple encounters. Part of this is from the  heroes having to beat them over and over again,   you can’t really describe your villain  as nigh-invincible and have that stick   after they got ‘vinced’ a bunch of times, no  matter how lucky or contrived the victory was.   The other part though is that the more sequels  something has, the more depth and explanation   we get of the bad guy, and the more they start  seeming not to make sense. This is also often   true of nominal space fairies or ancient  precursors who we often see in a franchise   as super-powerful and old and benevolent but who  “Don’t get involved” except for when they do.   The more we learn of them, the less they often  seem like wise elders, and often their motives   seem frankly stupid, perverse, annoying,  or downright evil. The Stargate franchise,   especially in later series, tended to call  that out more often, having introduced Earth   and its heroes to lots of kind and wise alien  races who sympathized with Earth’s plight of   being attacked by aliens but were light on  real assistance and heavy on platitudes.   Stargate’s heavy on the big-bad aliens with no  particularly logical reason for their behavior   and fairly irritating villainous plans too. I  love that franchise and rank it as even better   than the greats like Star Trek and Star Wars, but  the original big bad is an alien species that uses   humans as hosts, they’re a type of parasite,  and as slaves and soldiers and worshippers too.   The worship only feeds their ego, which appears  to be insatiable, and they are demonstrably in   possession of advanced automation and  science, like cloning and robotics,   so why they have this relation with humans is  unclear. Later villains shown are the Ori, who are   essentially all powerful but like being worshipped  and apparently feed off it, and the Wraith,   who feed on human lifeforce energy. They also have  advanced technology which should include cloning.   Space vampires are a trope that is nearly  as overused as regular old vampires.   We don’t have life force energy you can suck  out, unless you mean stuff like Protein or   Fat or Adenosine Triphosphate, all of which are  more easily available through non-human sources.   If we’re talking about feeding on the human soul  – which is definitely not what the Wraith do but   is implied to be what the Ori are doing – then  this is fine from a story angle, it's simply   taken for granted a soul exists which science  doesn’t have any commentary on for or against.   So it works for scifi or sci-fantasy but isn’t a  good one for extrapolation to contemplating actual   real alien civilizations and their behavior or  motives. Whether or not souls exists, it would   seem a bit of jump to assume some alien race fed  on them and was capable of feeding on human ones.   Developing a taste for aliens from  another planet would seem a peculiar   path for evolution on a planet to take. However farming humans is a popular trope in   scifi, and a great story but pretty much always a  bad execution in terms of plot holes, like in the   Matrix where they use human as an actual source  of electrical power. If you are going to farm   humans for their souls, then presumably you want  to maximize humans, so you’d probably be building   them a dyson sphere or colonizing hundreds  of planets to plant them on, not blowing up   the one they live on, its bad animal husbandry. You would also presumably be wanting to maximize   whatever the nutritional value or taste was that  humans had, which if we’re assuming human better   than animal would tend to imply options like  smarter tasted better or more life experience did.   Harvesting humans for their memories seems  plausible – indeed it's not a bad reason to create   and run a simulated Universe with them in it,  but this probably would not be destructive.   You just sneak a chip into their heads that  records and transmits their lives, it need   not even necessarily be all that sinister. Which might make for a very irritating afterlife.   You show up at the nominal pearly gates and some  alien St. Peter walks up with a clipboard saying   “This afterlife sponsored by the Aldeberan  Realistic Games & Holograms Corporation,   please sign this waiver for recording your  life and uploading your mind to enter.”   Certainly annoying but better than finding  out they feed on pain and nightmares   and find folks who lived happy and satisfying  lives prior to that made for the best meals.   Again we can derive possible motives for  aliens from an apparent observed behavior   or hypothesize motives for aliens for a story  but often on reflection we can figure out a much   better way to achieve that goal than what was  suggested in a story or apparently observed.   One that comes to mind is the Borg from Star  Trek, famous for their introductory message   on their phone calls, “We are the Borg… You  will be assimilated… Resistance is Futile.”   Then they attack and blow stuff up and abduct  folks and stick clunky hardware on them.   They’re terrifying in that they  are mysterious, cold, implacable,   and unstoppable. They have no pity for your  pleas, because not only do they not care,   but they think you should regard them as  doing you a favor for assimilating you.   Great villains, especially when written  right, which sadly was often not the case..   Pragmatically you would expect such a  civilization might tend to follow a path   of least resistance though, and convert people  with better public relations. Same thing for   the evil parasites in Stargate, you show up with  high technology and offering folks a better life,   having some converts talking about how awesome  it is – even if they’re brainwashed by the alien   puppeteer –and how its strictly voluntary. This is  going to get you plenty of converts, and you just   exercise patience until once you’ve got your  numbers up. Aliens and Artificial intelligences   should been shown as inhuman, makes for good  stories and better realism, but should not   be assumed to be stupid. They may be inhuman in  thought, but they should be smart enough to know   the value of understanding how humans think and  having the ability to ape it or manipulate it.   This then, is a key take away for more serious  contemplation of encountering aliens or some   AI we might make, or some alien AI.  They may not be human, and we can’t   assume they will have human motivations  and behaviors, but we should anticipate   they would be smart enough to see the value in  understanding human motivations and behaviors.   In that regard, while an Alien civilization  might opt to simply brute force overwhelm us,   and probably could, we should probably not  assume that they would. That instead they   would opt for the slow and patient strategies,  given that they probably have time to spare,   and that the alien is more likely to invade  holding gifts than guns, offering friendship and   smiles rather than threats of annihilation. So this will wrap us up for another scifi Sunday   but we’re going to be having an extended edition  of the episode over on Nebula, where we’re going   to a lighting round on 10 of the best known alien  invaders of fiction and what was wrong, stupid,   or annoying about their motives and methods, and  we’ll try to briefly explore those alien minds.   And if you want to explore some alien  worlds, our sponsor, Curiositystream,   has a great episode of Space Phenomena on Alien  Planets that explores what some leading minds are   contemplating for strange environments and the  stranger life forms that might arise on them.   If you’d like to see that extended edition of  today’s episode, or any of our other extended   episodes, those are available on Nebula, our  streaming service where all our episodes air early   and ad and sponsor free, alongside some exclusive  episodes like our Coexistence with Aliens series.   There’s also many other excellent creators there  who put out exclusive or bonus material.   Now you can subscribe to Nebula all by itself  but we have partnered up with CuriosityStream,   the home of thousands of great educational  videos, to offer Nebula for free as a bonus   if you sign up for CuriosityStream using  the link in our episode description.   That lets you see content like “Alien Planets”,  and watch all the other amazing content   on Curiositystream, and also all the great  content over on Nebula from myself and many   others. And you can get all that for less than $15  by using the link in the episode’s description.   So we’re done for today but not for the week,  and this Thursday we will be discussing whether   we should go to Mars now or return to the Moon  and establish a base there first. The Thursday   after that we will jump into the distant future -  or maybe not too distant future - to look at the   End of Earth. Two weeks from now we will have our  Monthly Livestream Q&A, don’t forget to join us   then to get your questions answered. Also if you  missed our most recent episode, last Thursday’s   Strip Mining the Galaxy, you can still check that  out, and it’s sequel, the Galactic Laboratory,   will finish us out for July, on the 29th. If you want alerts when those and other episodes   come out, make sure to subscribe to the channel,  and if you’d like to help support future episodes,   you can donate to us on Patreon, or our website,  IsaacArthur.net, which are linked in the episode   description below, along with all of our various  social media forums where you can get updates   and chat with others about the concepts in the  episodes and many other futuristic ideas. You can   also follow us iTunes, Soundcloud, or Spotify  to get our audio-only versions of the show.   Until next time, thanks for  watching, and have a great week!
Info
Channel: Isaac Arthur
Views: 146,825
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: crop circles, seti, ufo, slying saucer, alien, aliens, extraterrestrial, sightings, exoplanet, sace, astronmy, science, fiction, uap, future
Id: 4zlHXTSPR9I
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 23min 13sec (1393 seconds)
Published: Sun Jul 11 2021
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.