After Uvalde: Guns, Grief & Texas Politics (full documentary) | FRONTLINE
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: FRONTLINE PBS | Official
Views: 134,054
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: w8TSDbLr7_s
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 53min 18sec (3198 seconds)
Published: Tue May 30 2023
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Subreddit Quick Links
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
PBS.com will have it online by now.
https://twitter.com/AmanpourCoPBS/status/1664350705392525316?s=20
Tonight there will be a segment on the "making of" and promotion with Hinijosa on the Amanpour show - an house show and she has three guests so I guess they wil give this ten to 20 minutes time. Might get a update of sorts from it too, since the edit only goes up to last week or so's events.
Don't forget PBS always includes some web-only bonus content with programs like this. I just finished seeing this last night. FRONTLINE is often some of the best television has to offer. It's always independent producers and they are often some of the best speaking to top experts.
Maria Hinojosa is an experienced and well-respected NPR affiliated journalist and features reporter, you probably heard her on Latino USA on an NPR station.
Having said all that, this is not forward looking investigative journalism it's got a bit of a "let's take a look back and make some conclusions and pronouncements" air to it. And that's good but sometimes they are better at explaining corruption and here it' more of the "give them enough rope" to the pro-gun politicians and not to much if anything at all about how the coverup and partisan political fight regarding how the truth is redacted here.
It's got a good profile of Caitlyn Gonzales that is inspiring, the ten year old activist from room 106, whose best friend Jackie died.
The section on why the LEOs delayed starts around 11 minutes in, and highlights the partnership of the producers and FRONTLINE with the Texas Tribune, so Zach Despart is the main interview there. Despart shows the on-camera host Hinojosa the initial team north and south running away and then fast-forwasrs fror the next hour of the hallway. Then they move into the aspects of the AR-15 and officers fear of that weapons system.
We don't get into issues of command and control really at that point, which is fine, but it does show you the general message that the Texas Tribune is pushing editorially.
At 15 minutes in or so, Zach Despart makes a pronouncement that's more or less the conventional wisdom / consensus opinion that the officers were not present for the main massacre, which is true but he doesn't address the fact that multiple officers were on or at campus before the shooter got into the building, and that irks me to no end. Not only was there a huge missed opportunity there, they worked hard to lie and obfuscate about it after. I want that to be known and spoken about and of course reposted to by authorities but it didnt happen here.
"Most if not all the killing took place before police had the opportunity to intervene," Despart pronounces and I strongly disagree with that assessment. I think he means well and it's broadly true in a way, but he's mis-coloring the event as I see it. They had a good chance to intervene when the shooter was in the parking lot, and the school officer who drove onto the playground made a bold and sincere effort to do so - at first, in his vehicle. (if that's his shadow from the south door we see, it is visible ten seconds after the gunman enters the classroom and he's there awaiting backup for some time.)
But the ones who piled up at the wreck - three cop cars in all, and possibly more on Geraldine we dont see, including Maldonado and Ruiz - all failed to press forward when they had a huge advantage - the shooter on foot in the parking lot, three men with cars and guns, maybe more. Canales is on record as seeing the shooter WITH AN AR-15 in the parking lot. None pressed forward. It's possible Coronado never saw him enter. Hard to say for sure. But technically there was opportunity to intervene, and even efforts to intervene. So, nuance. And no video to show this, so no TV dramatic moment. But video exists, it's just been corruptly hidden.
And it's odd because the other line of thinking Despart and the Trib pushes somewhat is the "officers feared the AR-15," which is not wrong, it's just a bit more nuanced than that, IMO. They seemingly feared it in the parking lot, too. But I sure wish someone had driven into the teacher's lot and blocked the west door or just run the little sociopath down with their cop car. Perhaps hindsight is 20-20.
And they feared the AR-15 behind a closed (they thought locked) door, too. So much so that they called for a federal tactical team rather than use their own, elders of which were already present. Again, complexity that television doesn't deal with well and the producers here seem to take direction from their partner the Texas Tribune but failed to avail themselves of the full "trove" (Zach Despart's own words) of leaked videos and investigation materials. That' the rub, they aren't investigating Uvalde at Front-line, they are wrapping up and presenting the issues as if it is a done deal, historical fact, water under the bridge and maybe it is but it's water colored red with lies and blood that needs to be spoke to, not let pass, IMO.
Despart does speak to the fact that LEOs knew kids were calling 911 but he uses the same sentence to move on to the rifle being able to penetrate body armor. And this to me moves past a huge point quickly, the idea that kids were known to be in immediate danger, and that whole line of failure and injustice and the resulting coverup of this wasn't really dealt with.
Then they speak to the pediatrician and he speaks of the size of the exit wounds, etc. It's powerful, I with the pediatrician was fear more on all media. He's an unassailable advocate and voice, IMO.
But at this point, editorially speaking they have moved away from responsibility for the systemic failures and on to the policy response, which IMO is another systemic failure that naturally follows the first, in a way. How can we get good policy without confronting the truth? But they say something similar when they discuss the Emmet Till open casket theory of having the public see the damage an AR-15 does. But of course they just talk about, they don't show it. The pediatrician says maybe the public needs to see what he saw. Maybe. Just not on PBS, and not today.
Because from there it's on to the legislative response, after a short bit where they show Hinjosa asking for an audience / interview with Greg Abbott and being turned down.
She speaks to Roland Gutierrez and the Raise the Age bills and that leads to the need to give republicans their "equal time" and we are only 23 minutes into the program.
The good part is they spend more time with Caityln Gonzales and go over the 1970's walkout from Robb. That' possibly the best part of the whole program. It concludes with the idea that in both 1970 and today, it's the children rising up that counts, that might make the difference. This get more than ten minutes. It's great and redeems the personal reasons I disked the choices they make. I can see why they went this way. I just wish they didn't.
Then we see Caitlyn's powerful speech wheres in tears, shaking, she tells the crowd on the capitol steps, "I should'nt be here, I'm only ten years old but my friends have no voice."
And the rest of the program follows the failed lege efforts of parents and Gutierrez, and the partisan fights over gun control vs "mental health" dodges that the GOP uses but won't fund. And how that leads to a failed end to the lege session for all the gun control bills.
It's powerful televison and a good program. But DPS McCraw gets a complete pass, and that's just how these editorial decisions have to get made when you only have 60 minutes to tell the story.
It's good on the science, the law, the policy and suffering and speaks directly to some in politics who prolong the suffering, to be sure but won't make a statement as to who is RESPONSIBLE for prolonging the suffering. It's PBS. They have to give airtime to the NRA's viewpoint or else risk defunding, frankly. The GOP will attack Sesame Street, too. Not just FRONTLINE or NPR. We live in perilous times and speaking truth to power is a touchy game when your voice depends on donations and government mandated air-time and broadcast width on the spectrum of "free" speech that always seems to need paying sponsors.
The program ends with the Raise the Age bill passing out of the conference committee but then dying. "It will be another two years before the families can try again." are the last words.
Powerful.