10 FACTS EVOLUTIONISTS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW (Response)

hello and welcome to my channel biofloc box in this video I'm going to be talking about ten facts that evolutionists don't want you to know fact number one the Big Bang Theory is one of the most ridiculously impractical theories for the origin of the universe that's misleading I thought you're going to talk about evolution this is cosmology not the same thing at all basically the Big Bang Theory teaches that a large quantity of nothing decided to pack together tightly and explode outward in order to create stars and heavier elements through more solar combustion Lawrence Krauss has authored a book on the subject it's called a universe from nothing I'd be willing to bet that you haven't read it basically the emptiest vacuum you can imagine contains what are known to quantum physicists as virtual particles which are continuously popping in and out of existence so we know that something can indeed come from nothing and more educated people than myself have put together very detailed models explaining different ways that this could result in the universe what makes this theory so impractical is first of all nothing can't explode I mean when was the last time you blew up nothing this should just go without saying next explosions don't produce organization they do the opposite they cause destruction think about it it's like saying you could throw a bomb into a junkyard and get a Mercedes dealership it's impossible it just can't happen I don't think you did any research into what the Big Bang actually is for your video it was not an explosion in the same sense that a stick of dynamite sets off an explosion it was more of a just a rapid expansion here's a great video featuring Lawrence Krauss where he discusses the origin of the universe fact number two the fossil record it does not support the theory of evolution this is because no actual complete skeletal missing links have been found missing links are remains that prove one species have crossed over to another like a half man half monkey evolution teaches that through natural selection and mutations it took men approximately 6 million years to evolve that means during that whole time species of animals were changing from one to another and progressing towards manhood yet there is not one complete set of skeletal remains that prove this there should be literally millions of complete skeletal remains of transitional types of species if evolution did in fact take that long to occur but what do we have instead some skulls and teeth and other small fragments of bone which really prove nothing because if you don't have the complete skeleton from where the remains came from you can't prove they are transitional fossils simply claiming those remains came from a transitional type of species is not enough proof I see what you did there I love that qualifier complete I gather that you know that without it your argument fails miserably we have dozens of transitional fossils all throughout the fossil record and you don't need a complete skeleton to demonstrate that an animal doesn't belong in a certain group if you just have a skull for instance a paleontologist will be able to tell you what species the skull came from sometimes it can be so obvious from just from one single skull that even my six-year-old daughter at a recent trip to the Science Museum was able to point out the differences between the skulls of chimps humans and Australopithecus afarensis not to mention some of those transitional fragments have turned out to be complete hoaxes take Piltdown man for example in 1912 parts of a jaw and skull were found in England and called Piltdown man evolutionists used these remains to claim they had clear evidence that man descended from ape-like creatures however in 1953 it was proven to be a total forgery laboratory tests confirmed that the bones were rather recent not ancient and that they had been stained with bichromate to make them look old also the canine tooth of the skull was found to have been filed and stained this isn't the only hoax like this I'll include a link in the description box to a book entitled evolution cruncher which goes into more detail about this and thousands of other scientific facts that discredit the theory of evolution Piltdown man was debunked by science when it was discovered that it was a fake scientists were the ones who pointed it out the same scientists whose work supports the theory of evolution if there were some massive conspiracy to push evolution against all evidence then it would have been in their best interest to keep the Piltdown man hopes a secret fact number three dinosaurs did not go extinct 65 million years ago in 2005 paleontologist Mary Schweitzer discovered blood vessels in the thigh bone of a Tyrannosaurus Rex which supposedly went extinct 68 million years ago but according to the theory of evolution this is impossible because traditional ideas of how fossils form do not allow for the preservation of soft perishable organic tissues not to mention the thigh bone itself was relatively unfossilized this points to a young age for the remains of the dinosaur bones roughly about 4,300 years corresponding with the time of the Biblical Flood Mary Schweitzer is a devout Christian and she has gone on record several times saying how annoying it is that young earth creationists have hijacked and misrepresented her work here's a link to a paper where Schweitzer is the primary author which looks into how soft tissues may have been preserved for millions of years not only did dinosaurs not go extinct 65 million years ago there still may be some around today over the past century there have been a few instances where what looked like dinosaur carcasses have been discovered the two images that you see here are of two possible play Co stars the one on the left washed ashore at Monterey Bay California in 1925 it had a 20 foot long neck and some witnesses described a number of legs on the creature the image on the right is of a creature that was caught off the coast of New Zealand in 1977 by a Japanese fishing-boat it was 32 feet long and weighed two tons the image on the right was most likely a basking shark carcass which was shown by analyzing the amino acids found in the muscle tissue the one on the left is a Baird's beaked whale here's a better picture of a whale carcass I don't see any feet or a long neck for that matter though I do see how its long body could be mistaken for a neck if seen in a picture taken from the correct angle but all that is beside the point if Plesiosaurus had somehow survived into the modern era that would not disprove evolution sharks have been around for mostly unchanged for about 400 million years there is no evolutionary reason for thinking that a single species should not survive through the ages it is just highly unlikely also depending on who you ask you could technically consider birds to be dinosaurs so if you go that route dinosaurs are alive and kicking today and are often quite delicious back number four evolution has occult roots many people don't realize this but Charles Darwin was not the inventor of evolution he just made it popular the fact of the matter is evolution has much older occultic roots thousands of years before Darwin people in shamanic cultures believed that humans and animals were related evolution is also at the core of the Hindu and witchcraft belief system in addition ancient Greek philosophers spoke about evolutionary concepts fails of Miletus asserted that all things originated from water and Anaximander suggested that men originated from animals of another sort the theory of evolution can also be compared to the New Age movement and Freemasonry the New Age movement teaches that Humanity is evolving to a cosmic consciousness which will enable us to attain to the godhood within us Freemasonry teaches that through a progression or evolution of degrees one may become God of course this light comes straight from Satan when he told Eve in Genesis chapter 3 verse 4 you shall be as gods I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt on this one and say that everything you've just said here's abbs 100% true mainly because I don't feel like spending the time it would take to properly research all that so it's all true evolution originated in the occult so what that doesn't make it not true scientists don't believe evolution because Chuck Darwin came up with it they believe it because of a huge body of supporting evidence this is something I've noticed that creationists tend to have a hard time wrapping their heads around religion is based on Authority the Pope speaks ex cathedra and it's accepted as doctrine without question the authors of the Gospels say that jesus said certain things it has to be taken as absolute truth don't question the authority in science there is no authority if you can disprove something it doesn't matter what your credentials are you don't have to have any scientific training whatsoever if you're right it will be duplicated by other scientists to confirm and you will be recognized for having been right the reason that scientific discoveries tend to go to people with scientific credentials is just a matter of education I mean if you spend your entire life dedicated to some very specific study of science then you are far more likely to make new discoveries in that area than someone who has been spending their entire life sitting around on their mother's couch on unemployment fact number five evolution is impossible because of irreducible complexity irreducible complexity means that certain biological systems are too complex to have evolved from simpler or less complete predecessors through natural selection or chance mutations there is an entire series of videos which go into detail about this subject called incredible creatures that defy evolution you can even find clips of those videos on YouTube and they have a web page on bible probe com they talk about animals that could not have evolved because they are too complex one example is the bombardier beetle the following quotes are from their web page the bombardier beetle defends itself by mixing chemicals that explode firing through twin-tail tubes that can swivel like gun turrets the bubbling liquid that shoots out at 212 degrees Fahrenheit is enough to deter most predators the force of the round should be enough to blast a little beetle into orbit if not pieces and it would be if it was discharged at one time slow motion photography has revealed that the crafty beetle actually lets go with the stream of up to 1,000 little explosions together they are enough to put off would-be attackers while leaving the small defender with its feet still on the ground there is simply no way the bombardier beetle could have evolved its sophisticated defense system over time adding swiveling gun barrels or its repeater firing mechanism at different stages it needed them all in one package at the same time a beetle that blew itself up would not be around to develop a more refined firing system a beetle that could not keep the enemy in firing rage would not survive to work on more maneuverable firepower there's simply no way a slow gradual process will produce this beetle this is one example of many given by incredible creatures that defy evolution others include the giraffe woodpecker and even the chicken egg if you would like more information on those or other animals that could not have possibly evolved click on the link to the incredible creatures that defy evolution that I have left in the description box or look up incredible creatures that defy evolution on YouTube here's a link to a great article discussing the irreducible complexity specifically the bombardier beetle it describes how each step of the evolutionary process could have happened and gives examples of current living animals that display the characteristics of almost every step also funny that you should mention the giraffe it's an excellent example of a creature that is surely not intelligently designed the laryngeal nerve in a giraffe in all mammals actually including humans becomes trapped under the aortic arch during the embryonic development the nerve needs to go from the base of the brain to the top of the throat where the larynx is to do this because of the aortic arch trap it has to run down to the chest first in a giraffe this means that it needs to take a four point five meter detour just to travel a few centimeters fact number six evolution is impossible because of the DNA species barrier DNA doesn't allow one species to evolve into another one in other words there is no way no matter how hard you try that you can produce a cat from mating different breeds of dogs over time it's a biological impossibility DNA has a species barrier which prohibits one species of animal or plant from crossing over into another one the best that can be accomplished is the creation of different breeds within a species take the american english coon hound for example it's a 1905 breed of dog developed from virginia hounds which were developed over time from dogs imported to the United States but it's still just a dog even though it's a relatively new breed also if you look at different animals and plants in the world they are relatively easy to distinguish it's not hard to see that a fish dog cat monkey and human being are all different species yet if evolution really went on for 6 million years like evolutionists claim and throughout that entire time fish evolved into land animals and land animals evolved into other land animals and human beings there shouldn't be such a clear distinction between species we should have all kinds of transitional types of life-forms around us right now but they don't exist which means that evolution never happened there really is no genetic species barrier and species are definitely not as clear-cut as you're making them out to be we're surrounded by transitional species if you want to get technical every species is a transitional one but if you're looking for more specific characteristics you can look at things like the lungfish flying fish flying squirrel just to name a few that I've thought of atop my head now back to the species problem how do you define species a common way to define them is to say that they of the same species if they can breed and produce fertile offspring but you end up with these things called ring species where one ancestral type of animal can breed with all of the descendant types of animals but several of the descendants cannot breed with each other this ends up with the species barrier being quite a fuzzy thing nobody really can solidly define exactly what is a species because of this ring species problem and this lack of clear species boundaries is exactly what you would expect from from an evolutionary standpoint fact number seven written records don't support the theory of evolution the last stage of evolution is said to have occurred around 80 thousand years ago that's when the and earth oh man became human yet written records of mankind go back only five thousand years the oldest written record found to date is the Kish tablet from the ancient Sumerian city of Kish do you mean to tell me that man has been in the same stage of development and intellect for 80 thousand years and it took him seventy five thousand years to learn how to write something doesn't add up here however if we were created by the God of heaven around six thousand years ago like the Bible claims that would make more sense early humans had this problem where their food supply would do these strange things like run away they would have to spend a great deal of time and energy chasing it down they didn't have time to sit around developing written language because they had to survive it's possible to teach chimps to recognize written words so they have the mental capacity for written language why haven't they developed their own written language in the wild because they spend all of their time on survival it wasn't until the Agricultural Revolution that people started to have free time which is what allowed new technologies including written language to develop and even if it was just a case of ancestral human beings being too stupid to have thought it up on their own who cares our evidence for the age of the earth and evolution is not tied to when the written word was invented fact number eight evolution is a religious belief evolution is just as much if not more so of a religious belief than Christianity and biblical creation the reason being is because it takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does biblical creation for those that believe in biblical creation at least we have a written record that states God revealed the act of creation to Moses in other words we have the testimony of someone that was actually their God for the theory of evolution there was no one there to observe the origins of the universe so it's all guesswork not to mention the belief in creation is just more logical than evolution for example doesn't it make more sense to believe that all of this life on Earth full of complexity and design was created by an intelligent designer like God evolutionists however will not admit that their belief is a religion why my opinion is because it would violate the First Amendment of the Constitution which prohibits the government from supporting any one religion and evolution is taught in public schools in the United States therefore just like public schools are forbidden from leading students in prayer because prayer is a religious matter they would also be forbidden from teaching evolution firstly evolution is supported by mounds of evidence secondly let's apply core technology as creationists often like to do in any decent court of law actual physical evidence is weighed much more heavily than testimony and the person you have called to testify in this analogy won't even speak to anyone who doesn't believe in him and his testimony was recorded by several third parties thousands of years ago this is known as hearsay at any respectable Court would just throw it out and the definition of religion is usually centered around a supernatural or superhuman controlling power nowhere in any textbook and evolution does it say that there is some force controlling it outside of nature fact number nine evolution teaches immoral behavior you're going to bring up Hitler aren't you since evolution teaches survival of the fittest and that we were not created by God that means that we are not subject to God's laws or any other laws for that matter instead it's only the strong that survive by any means necessary Darwin also taught racism he claimed that some races were more evolved than others and therefore more intelligent and this line of reasoning has led to some devastating consequences throughout history Darwinian evolution was the driving force which led Hitler to first sterilize it and there he is then exterminate mentally and physically handicapped individuals in Germany and his eugenics program in 1939 it was actually called the act Eon t4 program it authorized specific doctors and officials to carry up mercy deaths euthanasia of those the state deemed unworthy of life Hitler considered them to be useless eaters over 70,000 people were murdered including children and the technology used to kill them was transferred over to the killing of the Jews in concentration camps during the Holocaust Hitler was motivated by Darwin's views on racism and survival of the fittest to exterminate the Jews he believed that by doing so he would advance the human race in the cause of evolution six million Jews lost their lives half of which died in horrifying concentration camps another famous individual Jeffrey Dahmer the American serial killer which murdered at least 17 people between 1978 and 1991 blamed Darwinian evolution for his actions he stated in an interview on MSNBC that evolution cheapens life and leaves you accountable to no one he also went on to say that he had accepted Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior after his father sent him some literature about creationism which exposed the lies of evolution on November the 28th 1994 Jeffrey Dahmer was beaten to death in prison okay there's a lot to deal with here firstly I don't recall reading anywhere that Darwin thought that some races were more evolved than others and I couldn't find anything like that in your sources secondly even if Darwin did think that as we established before he's not the God of evolution he can be wrong and was on many occasions then there's the whole Hitler thing this whole point is a logical fallacy known as the argument from consequences example if you let a new driver drive a car they could crash it and die therefore they should never be allowed to drive just because Hitler used evolution as an excuse for killing does not mean evolution is therefore incorrect otherwise I might be tempted to point out that his Hitler constantly invoked the Christian God when explaining his actions the German SS officers were belt buckles that said God with us so if evolution is wrong because Hitler was evil then Christianity is wrong on the same grounds as to the killing of children why is that a problem for you didn't your God personally kill hundreds if not thousands of children ever look into the history of the Passover how about Noah's Flood not to mention the ordering of the death of children in the conquest of the holy lands and happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks as to Jeffrey Dahmer if he accepted Jesus then by your own logic this mass murdering psychopath is now enjoying eternal bliss with minimal punishment for his crimes that's justice for you fact number 10 the theory of evolution is not a fact sometimes when I read comments on websites about the theory of evolution I find adamant evolutionist stating evolution is a fact if it's a fact then it wouldn't be called a theory the theory of evolution which is basically a set of ideas used to explain how life could have come into existence through time natural processes and genetic mutations this is not a fact because no one was there to observe it and no one can prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt if it was a fact it would be called the fact of evolution not the theory of evolution I have seen other of your videos where you actually show that you kind of understand the difference between a theory and a fact but either you are lying or you didn't understand what you yourself said Christians seem to be under the impression that if a theory gains enough evidence it then becomes and graduates up to the level of a fact this is not so a theory as an i policies that has gained so much evidence that it would be laughable to deny it for instance germ theory heliocentric theory gravitational theory a fact is simply an objective and verifiable observation theories are used to explain facts for instance fact if I drop a ball it falls the mechanisms for this are explained by the theory of gravitation fact animals change over time mechanisms for this are explained by the theory of evolution not to mention what's analyzed by any thinking Christian it becomes apparent that the theory of evolution is simply an attempt to explain away the existence of God so that people who don't want to submit to the authority of God in their lives could have some justification for not doing so so this is where he goes off on trying to convert you it's kind of boring so I didn't include it in my video thanks for watching have a great day

Channel: Viced Rhino

Views: 196,582

Rating: 4.6913376 out of 5

Keywords: evolution, creation, evolution vs creation, debate, rebuttal, debunk, bible flock box, evolutionism, creationism, science, creation science, cosmology, lawrence krauss, response vid, response, response video, debunked

Id: 9yJfbxHNow4

Length: 24min 49sec (1489 seconds)

Published: Thu Mar 17 2016