Recently, suspicions have been raised that a drawing created with ai was used in a popular webtoon. It's a controversial painting. The paid webtoon series originally had this composition. However, the artist's usual style of painting is like this. I think the expressions of eyes, shadows, and hair are strangely different. Subscribers who have enjoyed watching also immediately felt the difference, and suspicions are raised that the cut is similar to the picture of an image-generating ai called Nobel ai, so it is a work made of ai. When suspicions arose, the artist replaced the cut with another painting. The changed painting was similar to the original painting, so the suspicion of using the ai painting increased. Regardless of the authenticity of the case, I was able to confirm various opinions on the situation in which ai is used for webtoons. Among them, the most prominent keywords were learning data. The reason why people were angered more was because of the Nobel Ai. Nobel ai has been criticized once for collecting learning data without permission. Nobel ai said that it had collected data from an unincorporated site, and from then on, the image itself created by Nobel ai began to be criticized for infringing on the copyright of numerous artists. In a similar context, there were many public opinions that "it is morally wrong to use Nobel ai, which can infringe copyright on its own, for commercial webtoons." In fact, most generative ai is not free from this criticism. To improve technology accuracy, you need large amounts of data, and large amounts of data are collected by automation technology. It's practically impossible to determine the owner of all the data in the collection process. Someone's work will likely be used as learning data without permission. I think there will be talk of copyright infringement, but is there any problem in using learning data without permission? In principle, you have to get the consent of the copyright holder. However, as competition for artificial intelligence development is intensifying, there are copyright exemptions for using existing works in the process of developing artificial intelligence. In fact, the real problem lies in the production ai developed in that way. It is feared that secondary infringement will occur due to people who indiscriminately use generative ai. This is a report from an illustrator's follower to the writer. "Someone is stealing the painting by learning the artist's painting from ai." Community posts in question. The content is that 1,000 paintings of the artist are collected and studied on the non-firm website Danboru. When I went into the community, I saw a lot of postings that asked or informed me how to teach a particular artist's paintings and shared the situation where I was learning them myself. How is this possible in the situation where you and I are becoming popular writers? To give you an example of Nobel ai, you can basically create images based on images. You can also copy the seed number of the generated image and create another image based on that image. In other words, if you repeat image generation by using an image close to the desired direction as a seed, you can eventually generate the most desired image. Most of them used ai as if they were drawing pen art from their fan hearts, but it may be unpleasant for the artist to see the elaborate work being reborn in an instant. As a result, some writers even posted the phrase on social media, "Don't let ai learn your painting." In this situation, I wonder if there are any legally protected devices for writers. In fact, in the case of image ai, it is difficult to say that it has infringed copyright because it is common to see it as an idea area rather than an area of expression because it has similar aspects of style and feeling. If the final product is similar to an existing work, it will be a copyright infringement, but if the expressions are not the same or similar, there is a limit to claiming, if every individual artist's work is recognized as an expression, and the exclusive right may limit the freedom of expression by recognition. Protecting the rights by considering all of these things can lead to people being infringed on copyright. Fast people have already started to make money using ai. People who make illustrations with ai appeared on the talent donation platform for money. Quite a few people have already purchased the service. In fact, even if the sellers of ai paintings learn the image of a particular artist without permission and use the image to create and provide similar but different images, there is no proper way to recognize it. In this situation, some people developed their own devices before the system was established. "Illuminarty" is a program that determines whether an image is an ai-generated picture. It tells you what percentage of the probability it's made of ai. I learned that certain artists' drawings were taught with ai and uploaded without permission to a site where they could upload and sell such pictures as fanboxes or Paytrion. It was not long after the technology was established, so I started developing it because I wanted to have a positive effect on forming a market order while I was settling in. It is not yet possible to specify which artist's painting is, but it is hoped that a culture of using technology correctly will be formed starting with these indicators. At least, if such a program is used, I think it will reduce the number of cases in which the value of art is damaged by misuse of technology, such as hiding and selling ai-generated paintings or learning and selling paintings by certain artists. There's a lot of discussion going on about generative ai, and one thing is clear is that it's starting to be applied to industries around us at a very rapid pace. I hope that the relevant laws will be discussed more quickly and that there will be a device to reduce reckless copyright infringement, thereby reducing the number of weeping authors during the transition period. Please watch the video that the producer who made this video recommends. If you want to enjoy other videos of Subnews, please press the subscribe button.
