Hi, welcome back, I'm a donkey, would you like to buy a graphics card made by Intel? As a technology channel, we must be rushing, so from the moment Intel Arc was launched in Taiwan, we installed it on the abdominal muscles and used the auxiliary machine. The more you use the more fragrant driver, the more you update it, the more profitable it is. If I want to sum up the current performance of Intel Arc in one sentence, it is that with a good hardware scale and enough stockpiling, as long as the driver is online, the CP value is really nothing to say. And
the speed of releasing updates is always faster than our speed of releasing movies. At least so far, you can see that Intel really wants to make Arc better. It is almost a big update , and the frame rate of several games will be counted as a whole. The new product line they are currently paying attention to is the future graphics card series Intel Arc. I believe that everyone has read a lot of reviews of the Intel Arc series, so this episode will not talk about a bunch of technologies or test games. I am more concerned about it. Who "will feel its CP value if you buy Intel Arc" and "Is this good hardware scale good if it is used for creation besides games ?" Get ready and let 's start. Everyone is an audio-visual creator. The big era of the editor has already come. How much budget and menu do you think you need for a desktop machine that can edit smoothly ? In fact, two or three years ago, there was no such thing as 56,780,000 . In fact, it is difficult to assemble a machine that can truly edit 4K smoothly. The desktop computer of the film is not to mention the more intensive professional creation , but hey ~ the audience has a question, didn’t you say: the performance of PC hardware has improved by leaps and bounds in the past two years, and the mining tide has receded, finally ushering in a good age for assembling computers Hasn’t the price threshold of 4K clipping lowered after so many years ? Hey , I’m also very curious, so we’re going to challenge the entry price this time. If the budget is only 30,000 yuan, is there any way to assemble a desktop machine that can create smoothly ? The price band is also the main battlefield of Intel Arc A750. The current retail price of Intel Arc A750 is about 6800. The price is also about 7000. You can probably buy NV’s RTX 3050. But is it a little bit to compare Intel Arc A750 with RTX 3050? It’s boring, so
we directly jumped to the next level and chose the current market price of about 9000-11000. It is also the RTX 3060 that Intel Arc A750 is benchmarked against, and it is a 12G version . Since the budget is determined, there must be parts and materials, so we will contact you. Our good friend Intel , they simply sent the kit machine menu of Jieyuan group. I put it here. The price is just controlled at 30990. Some home 24h and some mo are sold on it . With some credit card rewards, it can be pressed at 3 The price of Wannai is already included with the genuine Windows 11 operating system, and there is no need to purchase additionally. The overall price is reasonable. However, if it is for creative purposes, I would recommend adding a 16GB RAM, at least 32GB , and this one is in Czech dollars. I think it’s okay for the specification. He gave a single 16GB instead of 8+8, so friends who want to expand can directly add another 16. Then Gigabyte also has an m.2 slot under this board for another one. The SSD set also comes with Jieyuan’s keyboard and mouse and a set of photobooks? Then there is also a three-year home delivery. Friends who are looking for a set machine can also refer to today’s actual test , so let’s not talk nonsense and come directly Test the performance of Intel Arc A750 vs. RTX 3060 12G on editing and creation related software . First, we see that the test software CrossMark score that simulates the real environment has a total of productivity, creativity and response to three items. We can see the results of Intel Arc A750 and RTX 3060 12G It is really close. The total score is only 1.3% away. Even the Intel Arc A750 is slightly better than the RTX 3060 12G in terms of productivity. The responsiveness is tied. The creativity is 3.1% less, but the numbers don’t make sense, so let’s just go straight to it. Entering the part of editing and testing, first test the Pugetbench of Premiere Pro, which is to measure the overall performance of Premiere Pro. This test software will be quantified into a score. You can see that Intel Arc A750 scored 619 points in the standard test. RTX 3060 12G It scored 584 points with a 6% improvement. If we increase the strength to test the Extended Intel Arc A750, it even scored 438 points. Compared with 3060 12G’s 356 points, it is 23% stronger than my body feeling. That’s why I am very satisfied. Looking forward to Intel Arc A750’s performance in professional performance. Thinking about their price difference, the CP value of editing and output is really high, because apart from the GPU acceleration in a few scenes, the impact of the driver is relatively low. I think At this stage, one of the usages of high CP value is to use it on the film clipper, and the price difference saved can also be used to upgrade the CPU . After all, clipping still has a high demand for CPU performance , and we will also look at the sub-items. Seeing that the Intel Arc A750 has opened up a gap of more than 10% in other items except Raw, which is 1% worse, I am more concerned about the GPU effect sub-item. The Intel Arc A750 scored 37.7 points for RTX . 3060 12G is 33.6 points. Wow, this result is really a bit surprising. I remember that the score of Intel Arc A750 in this project was not so high. It should be related to the driver update. Just plug in another RAM from the default 16GB to a total of 32GB dual-channel. At this time, the performance of Intel Arc A750 can be increased by 25% compared with 16GB. RTX 3060 12G is also about 40% higher than 16GB. So we can say At least 32GB is more than enough for creation. You should know how much the difference between 16GB and 32GB is. Let’s test another one, Davinci Resolve , which is also a mainstream choice. This software is also the first choice of many filmmakers If you choose Intel Arc A750, there is another small advantage in this software. Intel has a technology called Intel Deep Link. The purpose is very simple . It is to let the computer with both Intel CPU and Intel graphics card play the maximum performance potential , which is the so-called I + I. One of the specific functions of Intel is called super coding. Simply put, it is like Davinci when outputting You can schedule the Intel CPU’s internal display and Intel’s discrete display at the same time, so that they can simultaneously accelerate the output speed and squeeze out all the performance potential. Here you can also see that when I output videos, both the internal display and Intel Arc A750 are fully loaded at the same time. Resolve mainly relies on CUDA acceleration , so it is considered NV’s home field in this project. Whether it is in Standard or Extended, NV’s score is higher, and there is a gap of about 10% . But overall, the editing requirements of Premiere Looking at the 6800 Intel Arc A750, I don’t think it’s a pity at all. It can even be described as fragrant, because most players will still put their budget first on the CPU when it comes to editing, but when the ratio of the CPU budget is increased, it often leaves the quota for the graphics card. Not much, but now the graphics card is not high enough, because the output is very GPU-accelerated, so the price of the Intel Arc A750 is very affordable, and the output of the Pr is faster than the performance of the RTX 3060. The point is that the price difference of about 3000 is saved and used to upgrade the CPU , add a RAM or add a 1TB or 2TB SSD, both are suitable ! The editing needs are first tested here. We also simply tested a few professional software here . However, these more advanced needs have actually been solidified in the market selection, so I will share it with you. The first is the 3ds Max built by AUTODESK. After all, this software is an area that NV has been cultivating for many years. It was first won by RTX 3060. But if we saw CATIA, we have said before that this software is related to absolute performance , but here it is won by Intel Arc A750 . It’s Creo and it’s back to NV’s home field. But in Energy, the result surprised me. Although the difference is about 10% , Intel Arc A750 won this project. Maya’s performance is not much different. It is only 8.4% away, and it is about to catch up with RTX3060. In Medical, RTX 3060 is still locked. The Intel Arc A750 directly opened up a performance difference of 44% . RTX 3060 wins the same sentence. Consumer-grade graphics cards are consumer-grade graphics cards after all. Most of these professional software have deeper optimizations with graphics cards. You can refer to our previous episode of Graphics Cards vs Consumer-Grade Graphics Cards to choose according to performance requirements. A suitable card is the best strategy. In the end , although we said that this episode of the program focuses on creating software, we also briefly tested the game performance. First, we simply tested 3DMark Time Spy 20 rounds of testing. The stability reached 99.3% , and the GPU temperature fell to 78 degrees throughout the process . The CPU is controlled at around 76 degrees. We actually measured the temperature of the fuselage. The highest temperature fell to 63.7 degrees. We directly carried out the actual game measurement. In order to avoid memory bottlenecks, we will help you measure the preset 16GB and add a total of one. The two sets of results under 32GB are for you to compare and refer to, but after all, it is a packaged machine , so all the results will be based on 16GB. First, the FPS game CS: GO scored an average of 372 frames under FHD . 2K 261 4K also has an average of 140 frames, followed by Forza 5. Recently, Forza has a lot of strange frame rate bugs , especially after XeSS / DLSS is turned on. The frame rate of some image quality will drop instead. In short, let’s wait for Forza to update it quickly. Let’s test it first. The extreme image quality of FHD’s highest gear and ray tracing settings can reach an average of 58 frames along the edge , but under 32GB, it can reach an average of 68 frames, so dual channels and more capacity are somewhat helpful for ray chasing . If you want 2K image quality , it is recommended to choose ultra-high image quality plus highlight tracking. This item can reach an average of 73 frames. Under 32GB, it can reach an average of 80 frames. Therefore, 2K image quality plus highlight tracking will be better than FHD extreme image quality. Balanced choice, then run God of War, we will directly measure the result of 32GB, and there will be no bottleneck. Under FHD, the extremely high image quality at the top reaches an average of 53.6 frames. If it does not break 60 frames , then we will drop the picture a little. If you choose FHD for high quality, you can reach an average of 69 frames at this time. If you want to go to 2K with extremely high quality, it will be a bit difficult . It will be more balanced if you choose FHD for God of War and God of War . Only FSR is assisted , but the difference in frame rate is limited. Next, let’s look at GhostWire:Tokyo, which is relatively heavy on ray chasing. It directly drives to full movie quality and film ray chasing. At this time, the average is 57.5 frames. If you don’t turn on ray chasing, we will You can directly upload to 2K movies, and the average picture quality reaches 86.9 frames. Finally, the performance test software Cyberpunk 2077 first looks at FHD. The highest setting is under FHD, and the average is 75 frames. After XeSS is turned on, it reaches 92.98 frames. Let’s continue. If you choose 2K , you must need the support of XeSS. Under the extremely high quality of 2K, the average is 47 frames. After XeSS is turned on, it can reach 59.6 frames . Game optimization and support like XeSS is not popular for every game, it depends on the update schedule of the game manufacturer , but for a graphics card within 7000 or a set machine within 30,000, I think there are It has achieved the expected performance. It’s just that the game is not as unexpected as the creation software. However, according to Intel’s information, there are already more than 50 DirectX 12 games on the market that support XeSS. During this time , DX9 and DX10 are not compatible. The performance of games under the new driver has also improved one after another. On the whole, with the continuous improvement of Intel's driver update, the fragrance of Intel Arc is indeed getting higher and higher. But compared with the performance in games, I think the current Intel Arc One of the most delicious situations of A750 is to use it for editing. Because of the impressive graphics card size of Intel Arc A750 and the very good price in the market, the kit machine in our hand is only about 30,000 yuan. If your budget is only about 20,000 to 30,000 but you want to use it for editing , you will definitely need a graphics card. At this time, Intel Arc A750 is the high-end graphics card with faster output and better experience , and can also meet the needs of daily games. CP value selection Alright, the program of this episode is here first. If you have any questions, please leave a message below. Finally , the production of the program is not easy . Welcome to directly sponsor us to complete more valuable content by joining the channel membership or the super thank you button Thank you for the actual test program, I am a donkey, see you in the next video
